Aaron O

I saw that, I was wondering why?

Why are these lighter than the DNA Pro?

I used these in the Grand Traverse, starting in the dark and using them through the whole race into full daylight. Weather was warm then cold with driving snow, with high speed downhills. The lenses adjusted really well through all light conditions (my buddy's Julbos didn't seem to get as "clear" as these) and I had no fogging issues. I would have no problem subbing these for goggles in almost all conditions except maybe nuking wet snow - definitely worth it!

Used this jacket training for the Grand Traverse and during the race. It's kind of a no brainer in terms of being super light and with enough space to layer under. It is fairly water resistant so outside of full rain you can feel pretty confident that you will stay reasonably dry. It's part of the DNA line so of course it vents well. The back zipper is clever and doesn't really rub when zipped under a pack but note, especially for those doing GT or other events that require a larger pack - the hole real...

For a relatively high volume foot (103mm forefoot) is this boot or the PG Pro a better option - I have tried the PG in a 26.5 and it seems like it would work, but I have heard these Scarpas (in the 4.0 version) are pretty wide foot friendly as well?