Hi
My boots are Technica Zero G Peak. Will they work with these skis or should I think about heavier boots? If yes, which one you’d recommend? I am 150 lb, 169 cm. Currently skiing Rossignol Alpineer 96, 161 cm length.
Would probably go with 164 cm Backland
Thank you
Atomic Backland 101 Ski - Women
While the Backland 98 will forever live on in our collective memories as a wonderful and versatile ski, the time has come for an even more wonderful and versatile ski to take its place, the Backland FR 101. With a few more millimeters of girth and the beveled HRZN Tech 3D Tip, the Backland FR 101 handles powder even better than the original. In addition to increased flotation, the HRZN Tech 3D reduces mass at the tip of the ski, helping make turn initiation easier and more intuitive. The Powder Rocker has been increased to 35% of the ski's total length, which provides maneuverability and will help you confidently navigate tight and technical terrain. Finally, the Dura Cap Side Wall helps shrug off accidental impacts while allowing more weight to be directly placed over the edge, helping with edge hold in firm conditions. Finding a compelling balance of stability, weight, and maneuverability, the Backland FR 101 from Atomic is the perfect companion for any and all conditions.
- Ultra Light Wood Core blends Caruba and Poplar for a damp and stable ride.
- Dura Cap Side Wall directly transfers weight over your edges while increasing the edge's integrity.
- Powder Rocker has been lengthened to provide more maneuverability and flotation in dreamy powder.
- HRZN Tech 3D Tip is a perforated and beveled tip that helps with turn initiation and flotation in deep snow.
- FreeTour profile uses more wood and less resin, metal, and fiberglass to reduce the ski's carbon footprint without inhibiting performance.
- A great all-around ski and quiver of one!
| Specifications | |
| Lengths (cm) | 156, 164, 172 |
|
Weight |
1135g [156] 1230g [164] 1330g [172] |
| Weight (pair) | 2270g [156] 2460g [164] 2660g [172] |
|
|
125-100.5-115.5 [156] 127-101-117.5 [164] 129-101.5-119.5 [172] |
|
Turn |
16m [156] 17m [164] 18m [172] |
|
Skin |
Square tip & flat tails |
| Specs Verified | Yes |
| Design | |
|
|
Powder Rocker 20/65/15 |
|
|
Large shovel, medium radius, tapered tail |
|
|
Dura Cap Sidewall with FreeTour profile |
|
|
Poplar and Caruba with fiberglass laminate |
| Skimo Co Says | |
| Usage | Everyday touring, all winter long |
| Notes | Easy going ski that can handle anything |
| Bottom Line | Another great ski from Atomic |
| Compare to other High-fat Skis | |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
11/12/2024
11/13/2024
Hi Alexandra,
I think your Zero G Peak boots could handle these skis pretty well in good conditions! In more variable snow, or if you are trying to ski them more aggressively, you can get a bit more out of the ski with a heavier boot. If you are interested in going with a more downhill-oriented boot, we want to recommend one that will fit you well! I would suggest filling out our online boot fitter so that we can make some more informed recommendations.
I think your Zero G Peak boots could handle these skis pretty well in good conditions! In more variable snow, or if you are trying to ski them more aggressively, you can get a bit more out of the ski with a heavier boot. If you are interested in going with a more downhill-oriented boot, we want to recommend one that will fit you well! I would suggest filling out our online boot fitter so that we can make some more informed recommendations.
Answer this question:
10/21/2024
Hi! I’m 5’3 , 110 pounds, female skier who favors longer radius turns, and loves steep, committed skiing. Most of the backcountry skiing I do is in Chamonix, Wyoming, and New Hampshire.
I have the Black Crows Camox Freebird with ATK haute route bindings, 160 cm length and have loved the precision and reliability of this ski in firm conditions. For example, they served me well for skiing the Grand last spring, and is great for icy NH. But in deeper, heavier snow, I find it sinks and can be hard for me to turn (which could just be my technique!)
My wider set up is the Black Crows Atris Birdie, 160cm, with the ATK Raider 10. I really love the playfulness and performance of this ski and usually just accept the weight for the uphill if I know it’s going to be deeper or more variable snow.
But my uphill days are getting longer and longer and am looking for something lighter. Spring goal is to ski Denali.
I’m curious about the Atomic Backland (101 or the wider one) or any other model that you might recommend?
I have the Black Crows Camox Freebird with ATK haute route bindings, 160 cm length and have loved the precision and reliability of this ski in firm conditions. For example, they served me well for skiing the Grand last spring, and is great for icy NH. But in deeper, heavier snow, I find it sinks and can be hard for me to turn (which could just be my technique!)
My wider set up is the Black Crows Atris Birdie, 160cm, with the ATK Raider 10. I really love the playfulness and performance of this ski and usually just accept the weight for the uphill if I know it’s going to be deeper or more variable snow.
But my uphill days are getting longer and longer and am looking for something lighter. Spring goal is to ski Denali.
I’m curious about the Atomic Backland (101 or the wider one) or any other model that you might recommend?
10/22/2024
Hi Melissa,
Thanks for all the detail! I think the Backland 101 would be a great choice. It will give you more floatation and easier turning in soft snow than the Camox, while actually weighing less. Paired with a light binding, you'll have a super efficient setup that can handle soft snow easily, but should also be suitable for steep terrain.
The other ski that you might look at is the Armada Locator 104. This ski comes in closer to the weight of the Camox Freebird, so a little heavier than the Atomic. It will be a little damper in firm snow, and I think potentially a better ski for the steeps. It has a longer turn radius, which makes it enjoy long, smooth arcs at higher speeds, although it does have a fair amount of pop to it and can be pushed into smaller turns as well.
Thanks for all the detail! I think the Backland 101 would be a great choice. It will give you more floatation and easier turning in soft snow than the Camox, while actually weighing less. Paired with a light binding, you'll have a super efficient setup that can handle soft snow easily, but should also be suitable for steep terrain.
The other ski that you might look at is the Armada Locator 104. This ski comes in closer to the weight of the Camox Freebird, so a little heavier than the Atomic. It will be a little damper in firm snow, and I think potentially a better ski for the steeps. It has a longer turn radius, which makes it enjoy long, smooth arcs at higher speeds, although it does have a fair amount of pop to it and can be pushed into smaller turns as well.
Answer this question:
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
