Is there still a Small and Large NTN claw sizing / breaking point for this boot?
Is 26.5 still the smallest boot for the Large binding claw ?
SCARPA TX Pro 2.0 Boot
At long last, after years of whispers and rumors, SCARPA has unveiled the all-new TX Pro 2.0 Telemark Boot - and the wait was not in vain. Unlike its bulky forbear, the weight of the TX Pro 2.0 has been reduced such that it is comparable to modern freeride AT boots on the scale, helping your tired legs on an epic powder date. More impressively (and importantly), the TX Pro 2.0 boasts a 62° range of cuff rotation that even exceeds some AT boots and is a 300% improvement over its predecessor (TX PROdecessor?).
Designed to meet the needs of a diverse community of teleskiers, the TX Pro 2.0 is suited for more than just the backcountry. With tech toe inserts and an NTN sole, it is compatible with all NTN and TTS/tele-tech bindings and is powerful enough to handle hard-charging resort skiing, whether ripping moguls, surfing groomers, or skiing park. This hard-charging performance is due to the full Pebax construction (consisting mostly of sustainably-sourced Pebax Rnew) which preserves the classic SCARPA telemark flex that is so important to the turn. A Torsion Bridge Frame runs the length of the boot and crosses over the forefoot to increase lateral stiffness and maintain the power of the boot while keeping the weight low. The Vibram outsole will keep your heels on (and butt off) the ground whether on parking lots or ridge lines. Ushering in a new era of performance for those who refuse to lock their heels, the revamped TX Pro 2.0 is a must-have for those who buck the status quo.
- Plenty of boot for daily in-bounds usage, meaning the mythical one boot quiver has arrived!
- Comparable weight to modern AT boots with exceptional downhill mannerisms.
- 62° of cuff articulation will allow you to efficiently ascend the skin track.
- NTN and TTS binding compatibility gives you multiple binding choices, ensuring you aren't committed to just one standard.
- Lateral stability from the Torsion Bridge Frame improves edging performance.
- SCARPA’s Triple Injection technology allows the boot flex to be tuned so you can make glorious turns down the fall line.
- Single cuff buckle + Booster Active Power Strap makes for fast transitions and a secure fit against the shin.
- Vibram EVO LT outsole for reliable traction for icy ridgeline traverses.
- Made from Pebax and Pebax Rnew for that classic telemark flex and feel.
- After what felt like eons of waiting, the next generation of telemark equipment is upon us.
| Specifications | |
|
Weight |
1500g [27] 1597g [27.5] |
| Weight (pair) | 3000g [27] 3194g [27.5] |
|
|
3 + Power Strap |
|
Boot Sole |
282mm [24.5/25.0] 290mm [25.5/26.0] 299mm [26.5/27.0] 308mm [27.5/28.0] 317mm [28.5/29.0] 325mm [29.5/30.0] 334mm [30.5/31.0] |
|
Binding |
NTN, Tele-Tech |
|
Cuff |
62° |
|
Forward |
12°, 14°, 16° |
| Specs Verified | Yes |
| Design | |
|
|
Pebax, Pebax Rnew |
|
|
Intuition Pro Flex TK |
|
|
Vibram EVO LT |
| Skimo Co Says | |
| Usage | Telemark skiing |
| Notes | Lighter and 3x the range of motion of the old version |
| Bottom Line | The definitive boot for Telemark skiers in the backcountry |
| Compare to other Freeride Boots | |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
10/3/2024
10/8/2024
Hi John,
The 2nd Heel placement is the same as the previous version, so yes, 26.5 is the smallest shell size that will work in the Large binding.
The 2nd Heel placement is the same as the previous version, so yes, 26.5 is the smallest shell size that will work in the Large binding.
Answer this question:
10/1/2024
I’ve heard that some folks are recommending sizing up a size from the old tx pro. I think they cited the fact that the bsl has decreased as part of the weight saving strategy. Can you comment of the fit relative to the previous iteration?
10/1/2024
Hi Bob,
We would not recommend that approach. BSL is only a measurement of the external sole, which did get more compact on the new model (for better walkability) - BSL is not the same as internal shell length. One of my coworkers has tried on the new TX Pro and can confirm that it fits the same length-wise as other Scarpa boots.
We would not recommend that approach. BSL is only a measurement of the external sole, which did get more compact on the new model (for better walkability) - BSL is not the same as internal shell length. One of my coworkers has tried on the new TX Pro and can confirm that it fits the same length-wise as other Scarpa boots.
Answer this question:
9/5/2024
The future is finally here!
EE wide aka "born to ski"?
EE wide aka "born to ski"?
9/6/2024
Hi James,
If the question is, are these boots EE wide, the answer is no - we are expecting them to be slightly above average in width, but not exceptionally so. Of course, we have not actually received them yet, so difficult to confirm.
If the question is, are these boots EE wide, the answer is no - we are expecting them to be slightly above average in width, but not exceptionally so. Of course, we have not actually received them yet, so difficult to confirm.
Answer this question:
8/23/2024
Do you expect we'll be able to punch out the plastic in these boots for an EE wide foot?
And can you advise on shell size to order, or have an online fitting method?
In my case I wear 11.5-12 in American street shoes, and Euro size 46 trail running, biking, and hiking boots. That would translate to a Mondo 29.5-30 acc to the size chart.
But when you fitted me in the SLC store a couple of years ago for AT boots (the Dynafit TLT X), we went down a whole shell size to Mondo 28.5 for a snug fit end-to-end, and blew out the sides for my wide hobbit feet.
Should I figure we do the same here or is a touring tele boot that different from AT?
If it matters any, my intention is remount my Voile Hyper V6 BC skis to use these with Voile TTS Transit bindings. The idea is a beefier tele option for steeper slopes that's still lightweight with scales for long rolling approaches. Right now I'm a little wobbly in my Scott Excursion boots on Asnes Tindan skis mounted with the Switchback X2. But comfort is still important.
And can you advise on shell size to order, or have an online fitting method?
In my case I wear 11.5-12 in American street shoes, and Euro size 46 trail running, biking, and hiking boots. That would translate to a Mondo 29.5-30 acc to the size chart.
But when you fitted me in the SLC store a couple of years ago for AT boots (the Dynafit TLT X), we went down a whole shell size to Mondo 28.5 for a snug fit end-to-end, and blew out the sides for my wide hobbit feet.
Should I figure we do the same here or is a touring tele boot that different from AT?
If it matters any, my intention is remount my Voile Hyper V6 BC skis to use these with Voile TTS Transit bindings. The idea is a beefier tele option for steeper slopes that's still lightweight with scales for long rolling approaches. Right now I'm a little wobbly in my Scott Excursion boots on Asnes Tindan skis mounted with the Switchback X2. But comfort is still important.
8/24/2024
Hello Peter,
The Pebax in these boots can be punched. But like any Tele boot, you cannot punch the area around the bellows. Which is pretty much the spot for wide feet.
Your Scott boots would be the widest Tele boot. Scarpa boots have an average plus width, but not as wide.
Based on TLT X boot and the work done, this boot may not be wide enough.
Scarpa boots size differently so the 28.5/29 shell size would be the correct one for you. Sizing up in Tele boots may not work with your toes and the bellows.
You can always chat more with us at help@skimo.co
The Pebax in these boots can be punched. But like any Tele boot, you cannot punch the area around the bellows. Which is pretty much the spot for wide feet.
Your Scott boots would be the widest Tele boot. Scarpa boots have an average plus width, but not as wide.
Based on TLT X boot and the work done, this boot may not be wide enough.
Scarpa boots size differently so the 28.5/29 shell size would be the correct one for you. Sizing up in Tele boots may not work with your toes and the bellows.
You can always chat more with us at help@skimo.co
8/25/2024
Very helpful, thanks! Might stick with AT on the steeps then, and just tele where my wide Scotts will work. Scarpa how about a wide option?!
10/2/2024
For clarity's sake, Scott (Garmont) NTN boots are on a different, narrower last than their 75 mm boots. Just as Scarpa has gone wider on their NTN boots, Scott's NTN boots are narrower than their 75 mm predecessors.
Answer this question:
8/9/2024
Torn between learning Icelantic or Telemark skiing, I figured Telemark would be a more realistic goal.
My feet are a little wide, maybe a lot, pronated and with what I have been told, a relatively high instep. Scarpa boots, in the past, have not been the best choice for me. Do you think this boot might this boot work or should I be looking at other boots.
My Fischer Travers CS and Tecnica Zero G Peak Carbon's fit very well.
My feet are a little wide, maybe a lot, pronated and with what I have been told, a relatively high instep. Scarpa boots, in the past, have not been the best choice for me. Do you think this boot might this boot work or should I be looking at other boots.
My Fischer Travers CS and Tecnica Zero G Peak Carbon's fit very well.
8/10/2024
Hi JPM, given that the Travers CS works for you, I should think you won't be too wide for the new TX Pro. Scarpa's telemark boots are also wider than their AT boots, so I wouldn't be too concerned if you've had problems fitting in their AT line, especially so for their lighter AT boots.
Answer this question:
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
