Dynafit Seven Summits+ Ski Set
It can be confusing knowing what binding to fit to what ski, and for what size boot. If you are amongst those scratching your head over this conundrum you are not alone. To remedy the situation Dynafit has introduced their Seven Summits+ Ski Set. A pre-mounted package with an adjustable Radical ST Binding and precut Dynafit skins. All this set needs is unwrapping and adjusting (to your boot and ability) and it's ready to go touring. These mid-fat skis are light, full wood core, with a full ABS sidewall and lightly rockered tip and tail for ease of turning. Skins are trimmed and attach easily to the tip and tail using Dynafit’s Speedskin system. The Seven Summits+ Ski Set is a friendly pre-assembled ski set-up for those looking for an easy first step into the world of ski touring and backcountry skiing.
Seven Summits+ Ski
- Poplar wood core for an even, smooth flex.
- Full ABS sidewall for durability and edge hold.
- Rockered tip and lightly rockered tail increase maneuverability from turn to turn.
- Pre-mounted with Dynafit ST Radical bindings for an easy out of the box setup.
Seven Summits+ Skin
- Speedskin system uses a rubber tip and metal tail hook for reliability.
- Mix skin (70% mohair 30% nylon) for good glide and durability.
- Pre-cut skins match the shape of your ski; no trimming required.
ST Radical Long Travel Binding
- 2 easy to use risers heights plus flat mode make the climb that much more enjoyable.
- 50mm of adjustment allows for different boots to work with the bindings.
- Step-in towers guide your boot into the toe.
Please Note: The bindings must be adjusted for your size, ability, and boot sole length before skiing. Please visit a ski shop if you are unsure how to do this.
Update 2022/23: Along with designing a new topsheet, Dynafit tweaked the sole length ranges.
|Lengths (cm)||158, 166, 174, 182|
|Weight (pair)||3690g 
||Rockered tip and tail, camber underfoot|
||Tapered tip and tail, medium sidecut|
||Full ABS sidewalls and carbon stringers|
||Poplar wood core|
|Skimo Co Says|
|Usage||General touring, or uphill laps at your local resort|
|Notes||Weight includes bindings|
|Bottom Line||Performance package out of the box: unwrap and ski!|
|Compare to other Low-fat Skis|
Questions & Reviews
So for a 5’7”, 125 lb beginner skiing volcanos and peaks in the PNW, would you recommend these skis, and if so in what length?
I currently splitboard in a pair of unmodified original Scarpa Aliens (not carbon), and would like to use them with this setup if that boot isn’t too underpowered for these skis. Thanks in advance!
tall and 185 lbs. Intermediate skier, not aggressive. Which length do you recommend? I'm looking at the 166cm but 174 may be a better choice.
(I have a larger foot size, Mondo 30.5). I'm not sure I want to go to length of the 182 ski just to get the longer sole length. Also, I realize if I invest in new 30.5 boots, some would fit under the 329mm.
But Skimo is out of the 174cm length. If you are tall and big as your size 30.5 feet, maybe the 182cm is the ski for you? You can email us at firstname.lastname@example.org to discuss.
I'm looking for my first AT set-up for use in the front range of CO. I'm primarily a xc skier looking to get out on steeper backcountry terrain for longer tours. I'm 5'7" 130lbs. and not an aggressive skier. I'd like a good amount of control and light weight for climbs. I've considered the Black Diamond Helio 95 and other similar widths models, but the convenience of the seven summits setup is so appealing. I keep coming back to them. I'd probably go with the 158cm length and be pairing it with a hoji pro or radical boot. Do you think the narrower underfoot width would provide enough float for a beginner like myself to feel stable and in control? Thanks for any help you can provide!
85ish underfoot will be a total blast in most conditions! On the deepest days, you may be wishing for some additional waist width. However, The Seven Summits Ski Set will be great come spring. The convenience of this set is pretty awesome. Based on your height, I would go with the 166cm length.
If you have further questions on bindings, skis, or boots, feel free to reach out to email@example.com, or fill our a boot fitter / binding finder!
I've been debating between these and getting a package with something like the Voile Objectives (maybe the BC since those seem "more versatile"?). The Objectives are lighter, apparently ski well, and seem to have the ideal length: 164. These are heavier, 2cm longer (does that matter?) and comes with everything I need (minus the boots).
Thoughts on the matter?
Length - 2cm is less than 1 inch, not a significant difference.
The Objective is a popular ski in the NE and if you ski low angle, rolling terrain, the BC version is handier than skins. If you pair with a light, brakeless binding then you will have a much lighter package. If you wish to discuss this in detail, email us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Your chart indicates the (184cm) pair weigh 3064g. Is this total weight with bindings or without? (Your notes indicate to add an extra 550g for the pre-mounted bindings, but this seems way too heavy)
Great question! So the skis alone weigh in at 3064g but the bindings are an additional 1062g per pair. Thanks for reaching out!
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.