Dynafit has taken a classic 90's expression and slapped it onto the Radical ST binding to let you know how amazing it truly is. Note that Radical should be capitalized, which is pretty much an invite for you to get Rad, something you can very much do with this stout yet lower weight binding. A flick of the wrist (or pole) has you changing riser heights on the fly for those steep skin tracks, mellow approaches and everything in between. The hope is that every day is a powder day so the toe pins are built to break through compacted snow and ice that can build up on those deep days. Send to your hearts content, the lateral release is aided by a sliding plate under the heel for consistent release and the brakes will keep your skis close by to avoid awkward penguin slides to retrieve equipment. Tried and true, a real classic, legendary performance; however you want to say it the Dynafit Radical ST binding has a track record of performance that speaks for itself.
6mm plates under the toe and heel transfer power across a wide surface area for extra stability and control at speed.
Speed Step heel climbing bar offering 2 riser heights in addition to flat, which can be flicked into place with a pole after a little practice.
Power Towers on the toe pieces help guide your boots into the pincers, with bonus protection from side impacts.
A full 25mm of fore/aft heel adjustment adapts to various boot sole lengths, which can increase the resale value as more people can step in.
Brakes are included with 92mm, 100mm, and 110mm options* to match the width of your ski.
The brakes have a glide plate intended to reduce friction from rubber boot soles when releasing sideways.
Anti-rotational device on the brakes ensures the heel piece doesn't rotate accidentally and put you in ski mode while skinning.
Crampon slots are designed to hold Dynafit ski crampons for those steep and greasy skin tracks.
**Please ensure the ski brakes you select fall between 15mm less to 2mm more in width compared to the ski underfoot.
Update 2018/19 - The Radical ST is back and lighter than ever! Dynafit changed from steel to aluminum in the toe piece, ensuring time-tested performance both up and down but at a weight savings of 30g per side. The binding also gets new anodizing for a sleeker look.
Update 2021/22 - Dynafit dropped "ST" from the name, making this binding purely Radical. They also reshaped the toe lever (known as an excenter in Dynafit parlance) and reinforced the roof on the heel housing, somehow dropping another 15 grams.
Hello, I want to get my wife set up with some AT bindings, but also want to have the option of using them myself. Is there a binding that will allow for adjustment between our different boot sizes? (Looks like my Dynafit bindings only adjust by 25mm which isn't enough) She uses a 23.5 (US womens size 6) and I am in a 27.5 (US mens 10).
Hi Matt, there are a few bindings with 50mm of adjustment, but adjusting just the heel across those distances can leave your boot pretty far off the midsole mark. Best bet is an easy-to-adjust rental binding, please reach out to help@skimo.co for a couple options.
Answer this question:
2/10/2023
Question from
Rudy Dietz
Will these bindings work with Salomon Mtn Summit Pro boots? I’ve read in dynafit’s literature that they only “guarantee” correct for with certain brands of boots, and I didn’t see Salomon on the list..
Hi Rudy, Dynafit makes that "guarantee" for boots that use Dynafit inserts. Salomon didn't always use Dynafit-made boot inserts, but they do now, including the Summit series. Those boots work fine in the Radical ST.
2/10/2023
Answer from
Rudy D
Awesome awesome thank you much!
Answer this question:
1/3/2022
Question from
KRIS
I am interested in these bindings but have a 102 mm waist ski. I have some old dynafit bindings with ski brakes--would I be able to swap brakes over to these bindings?
Kris- All of the Dynafit brakes/base plates are different between years, so it will depend on which exact binding you have now. We are slated to get more of these bindings with wider brakes very shortly. If you would like to know specifically send us some photos to Help@skimo.co and we can atke a look.
Thanks for your question, Tom. The 100mm brake could be stretched to fit a 104mm underfoot ski. We're hopeful that we'll be getting the 100mm back into stock in the next few weeks.
Answer this question:
12/18/2020
Question from
Tom
Hi, I'm trying to decide between the ST Radical and ST rotation bindings to mount on my new Backland 100s and ski w Dynafit Hoji boots in the Tahoe area. This will be exclusively a backcountry set up and will be skiing conservatively. I'd lean toward the lighter Radical binding; but, if you think the Rotation binding adds significant safety for my aging knees, etc., I'd go with the extra weight. Thanks!
The Dynafit ST Rotation is TUV certified, which is rarified air in the world of tech bindings. The elasticity in the heel and rotation in the toe piece provide an extra safety margin over the Dynafit ST Radical.
If safety is a paramount concern, I would recommend the Rotation over the Radical.
Answer this question:
11/30/2020
Question from
Randy Lehr
I have a 95 mm wide ski under foot. Would you recommend the 92 or 100 mm?
Clement, They would be able to work. Without bending they will be close, may just need a tiny bend.
Answer this question:
10/22/2020
Question from
Alex
I just picked up a pair of Black Crows Solis skis. Do you think this binding would work well with them? In an interview the Ski’s designer said “ if you fix bindings which are too supple at the back, the boot will tend to want to release and finally, won’t ski well because the binding is always on the move. This ski transmits a lot of energy so it is useless to associate it with floating bindings. ” Thoughts? Thanks!
Hi Alex, it sounds like they don't recommend using tech bindings. The Solis is basically an alpine ski so I guess that makes sense (in Cham you can just step off the midi to go "ski mountaineering"). You could look at the Shift which is an alpine binding that has toe pins for the uphill.
I have been barraging you guys with questions.... sorry.
I want to replace my Vertical STs with something that has the nice flip-type heel lifters. I had thought about Pika, but you suggested the brake behavior is sketchy.
Occurs to me to just get Radical STs, and replace just the heel unit, so I'd have Vertical ST toes, Radical ST heels.
Any reason this won't work (with all the caveats about manufacturer warranty etc..)?
Hi Eric, if you replace the whole baseplate + brake assembly as well as the heel towers, then that can work. As usual when mixing and matching, you may not be able to trust the release value indicators.
92mm is the narrowest brake available for this binding, so that should work just fine for you unless you want to consider another binding or going brakeless!
Answer this question:
2/22/2020
Question from
Ian
Which size should I use on a pair of 106 K2 Waybacks, 100mm or 110mm?
We do not have individual bindings for sale, but you can purchase a toe piece, heel piece, and brake separately to build your own single binding. Feel free to e-mail us at help@skimo.co if you have any follow up questions.
Hi, for the Blizzard ZeroG 95 will a 100mm brake the right size??
Also, are you offering the latest model of the binding on your site, or is it a 2019 model?? Just curious, as I read that there were some improvements in a 2020 one.
Thanks
Diana
Hey Diana! Yes, that is the correct brake size for your Zero G 95's. We are indeed offering the most up-to-date model. There have been some minor tweaks to the construction of the toe piece for the 2019-2020 version; but the main news is Dynafit's announcement of a lifetime (aka, ten-year) warranty!
Answer this question:
11/19/2019
Question from
michael ward
Hi, Two questions:
1. What size of Radical ST binding do I need for the Voile Hyper V8s, 176?
2. I already have the Radical ST binding on a couple of skis. I love them because they are durable, light weight, and easy to use. However, with so many more options on the market right now, should I consider changing bindings? I view brakes as not essential (or a menace), all my bindings are set not to release, and I have the reputation of destroying things.
Michael, you would use the 110mm brake for your 112mm wide ski. Will most likely fit without bending the brake arms. Part 2. Note, Skimo never recommends skiing bindings not set to release. The Dynafit bindings are pretty bomber, but you can also look at Plum. You can order the Plum Guide or Yak without brakes.
Answer this question:
12/3/2018
Question from
Cody
Just bought some Dynafit Speedfit 84's. on the Radical ST, will the 92's work? Will they be sticking out wider than the ski?
Hey Cody! Yeah, they should work just fine! They'll be sticking out a little bit, but definitely not too much for concern.
Answer this question:
8/26/2018
Question from
Katie
Hello! I have the Hoji W 171cm skis, and am looking for a binding that will be used in the resort and for some straightforward backcountry, are these a good choice or would you recommend something else? The waist width on my skis are 112mm, what would you recommend for binding size? Thanks!
Hey Katie! Yeah these have a lot of potential to work. I think as long as your ideal release values line up within the range of these bindings then they'll do really well! Find your release value using our calculator here if you're interested. As for brake width though I think the 110mm will do fine. Dynafit sized these brakes pretty conservatively and there's a bit of buffer zone built in so I think they'll do just fine. Worst case you can bend the brakes out just a little bit to clear properly but I don't think you'll even need to go that far.
8/30/2018
Answer from
Katie M
Hi! And one more question-- Is the Dynafit - ST Rotation 10 the newer and more recent version of this binding? And as far as brake width on the newer binding would the 105mm work you think? Thanks!
Hey Katie! The Rotation 10 is an upgraded binding by about two generations worth of technology. They're designed to occupy the same place in Dynafit's lineup but the ST Rotation 10 packs a whole lot more technology (and weight) than the Radical ST does. I think for straightforward backcountry with very limited or no resort use the Radical ST is way more than adequate and the ST Rotation 10 is a good choice as well but only worth it if you need the added features that come with it.
8/30/2018
Answer from
Katie M
Okay, so I guess my question is, of their most recent binding line up, what binding is the best option for primary resort use, with some basic and straightforward backcountry use thrown in?
Hey Katie! Ha, dang, sorry if I didn't answer your question appropriately the first time! For primarily resort use I'd definitely recommend the ST Rotation 10 because of the extra release technology and DIN Certification thrown in. It acts much more like an alpine binding on the way down while still having all the touring benefits of a tech binding.
8/30/2018
Answer from
Katie M
Okay and would you compare the Rotations compared to BD Fritschis tecton 12?
Hey Katie! Kinda, but in an apples to oranges kind of a way. The Tecton is much burlier and functions even closer to an alpine binding than the Rotation 10 does. The Tecton definitely has a resort bias to it. Send me an email at help@skimo.co if you have any further questions and we can get to the bottom of this!
8/30/2018
Answer from
Katie M
Thanks- I sent one in regards to an earlier conversation with Nate- Maybe you can add to it- Thanks so much for your patience, and help!
Hey Chris! 25mm total fore/aft (meaning when the heel piece is centered in the track you can move it +/-12.5mm) which is generally enough for about 2.5 boot sizes but it depends on the exact boots you're trying to accommodate.