Fischer Transalp 105 CTI Ski
We expect a lot out of the modern powder ski. Sublime performance when the cold smoke stacks up, but capable of handling the ice luge back to the parking lot at the end of a long day. Luckily, Fischer has your back in the Transalp 105 CTI. Constructed from a paulownia wood core with carbon stringers, and featuring a generously rockered shovel, the Transalp CTI 105 is pure bliss in champagne powder. It is energetic and powerful, responding when you open up for GS turns should you please.
When the snow firms up, the titinal reinforced underfoot and flatter tail will get you back to the parking lot with confidence, and provide stability underfoot when conditions are less than ideal. Also, the sintered bases will stave off core shots on thin spring exits. Whether you are looking to round out your quiver with a charge-y powder plank, or prefer a wider daily driver, the Fischer Transalp 105 CTI should be on your shortlist.
- Paulownia Woodcore with Carbon Stingers gives the Transalp 105 CTI a lively feel.
- Shaped TI 0.5 provides stiffness and stability underfoot - this is a powerful ski.
- Tour Rocker to help keep your tips up for when conditions get deep.
- Air Tec construction helps keep the weight down for more laps.
- Sandwich Sidewall Construction for confidence in firm snow.
- Sintered bases soak up wax and will stand the test of time.
Specifications | |
Lengths (cm) | 164, 171, 178, 185 |
Weight |
1470g [171] 1580g [178] 1680g [185] |
Weight (pair) | 2940g [171] 3160g [178] 3360g [185] |
|
138-104-124 [164] 138-104-124 [171] 139-105-124 [178] 140-106-125 [185] |
Turn |
19m [164] 20m [171] 22m [178] 23m [185] |
Skin |
Z-hook tip, standard tail |
Specs Verified | Yes |
Design | |
|
Tip Rocker, titanal reinforced underfoot, flatter tail |
|
Rockered tip, generous sidecut, flat tail |
|
Carbon-Stringers, Air Tec, Sandwich Sidewall Construction, Sintered Bases, Shaped TI |
|
Paulownia Woodcore |
Skimo Co Says | |
Usage | Lap after lap of Mid-Winter cold smoke |
Notes | Titanal plate adds stiffness |
Bottom Line | Alpine performance for hard-chargers |
Compare to other High-fat Skis |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
You are a bit between sizes! Ultimately, it depends on whether you would rather prioritize a ski that is more maneuverable in tight places, and efficient on the uphill, or whether you would rather trade that maneuverability/ease of use for more float and stability/support at higher speeds on the downhill. If the priority is skiing powder more aggressively, I would opt for the 178cm (or 180 in the case of the Zero G). If this is more of a do-it-all ski, I would consider how much tree skiing and steep skiing you will be doing and whether the shorter ski might be a better option. In general, going a little shorter than your usual resort size in the backcountry is not a bad idea.
Both of the skis you're considering are stiff, and both have some rocker (the Fischer has a bit more in the tip). I don't think either of them ski "short" - they ski pretty true to their length.
I'm considering either Transalp 105/Backland 107 with Ski Trab Tr1 bindings against Salomon QST Echo with ATK Freeraider 15 Evo. From the weight perspective, it would be similar setup. Would the added elasticity of Ski Trab binding outweight Salomons Echos with absolutely rigid ATK binding? As I know, Salomons Echos are considered as etalon for (heavy)touringskis in dampness and overall comfort of ride. Thanks.
Thanks for writing in! I think this ski could be a great option if you wanted something a little more along the lines of your Rangers - stiff and pretty damp, but touring weight and versatile for many types of skiing. The Fischer Transalp 105 is a stiff ski with moderate rocker and some camber - a great directional ski for powder or mixed conditions.
If you wanted something more playful and a little softer, I would look at the Voile Charger Ace as a do-it-all resort and touring ski! It's heavier than the Hyper construction and will be more durable and damp for resort skiing, but not so heavy that you can't tour with it. It would be an excellent travel ski, with a lot of the great attributes that Voile is known for!
In terms of sizing, I think the shorter 171cm length would work great for you. The 178cm length is on the longer side for your height and weight, more stable and harder charging, but shorter skis can be a lot of fun too! They are more manuverable and easier to flick around, and both of the skis you're considering are pretty stable. I don't think you'd give up much in the shorter lengths, and they'll be better on the uphill as well!
I tend to consider the uphill to be more important because I don't want to feel like I'm out of gas when the downhill is where I need to be the most focused.
I am 5'11"/179 cm and 145 lb, and I am considering the QST at 173 or 181, this at 178, and the backland at 175.
I currently ski and enjoy the feeling of the MTN 96 @ 166 and the QST 92 @ 176, though I prefer the latter for trees and the former for fast(ish) on-piste descents.
How would you compare the three?
I think you might find a good match with the Backland 107! Both it and the QST Echo will be easy to turn in the trees, nimble and floaty in powder. The Echo is substantially heavier, however, so if you prioritize uphill efficiency, the Backland will give you that, and still be a good downhill performer.
The Fischer ski is stiffer and more traditional feeling, will require a firmer hand on the reigns. It is a great ski, but will be a bit different personality. It is a great damp touring ski at a reasonable weight, but more demanding than the Backland or Echo, and will require more input to turn at lower speeds.
The Transalp CTI has more metal in it and thus is damper and heavier than the Hannibal. More like an alpine ski, while the Hannibal is a more classic touring ski.
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.