How does the Head Crux Pro 93 compare to the Blizzard Zero G 95 in terms of performance? They are similar in weight, so I assume their uphill abilities are comparable, but which one would you prefer for downhill in different terrain?
I'm 5'6" (168 cm) tall—what ski length would you recommend? Around 170 cm or 163 cm for the Crux, and 171 cm or 164 cm for the Zero G? For reference, I currently use the Black Crows Camox Freebird and Head kore tour 93 in 170 cm, which I like them, but in some occasions I wish I had the 164 cm.
HEAD Crux 93 Pro Ski
HEAD has historically been an alpine ski company, so it's no surprise that their touring ski lineup has strong downhill chops. What is a surprise is that they've managed to achieve this at weights that make us here at Skimo Co go, "Oh, tell me more!" The HEAD Crux 93 Pro is a versatile ski, made for everything from firm steeps up high, charging through the wide-open apron, to enjoying every last turn through the trees on your way out. Its construction makes for an impressively stout ski at a weight that you won't mind hauling in for your next long objective. Lightweight Karuba and Graphene in the core make for a powerful flex and damp suspension, while the Triaxial Carbon Jacket provides torsional stiffness throughout the ski for a very reliable edge hold. In lieu of a traditional topsheet, HEAD instead shows off the skis' internal construction through an anti-snow coating, an innovation they call Topless Tech. So on those sweltering spring days out in the heat of the sun, only you, and not your skis, need to pop their tarp. The Crux 93 Pro from HEAD is ready to rock n' roll wherever you set your sights.
- Karuba and Graphene core is lightweight, stout, and damp.
- Woven Triaxial Carbon Jacket provides torsional rigidity and allows for reliable edge hold.
- Topless Tech omits topsheet material to save weight.
- Snow-free coating helps keep your skis....well.... snow-free.
- Structured UHM C Base is the same stuff Head uses in their World Cup race skis.
- Tail notch keeps your skins in place.
| Specifications | |
| Lengths (cm) | 163, 170, 177, 184 |
|
Weight |
1135g [163] 1175g [170] 1220g [177] 1290g [183] |
| Weight (pair) | 2270g [163] 2350g [170] 2440g [177] 2580g [183] |
|
|
130-93-113 |
|
Turn |
15.0m [163] 16.7m [170] 18.6m [177] 20.4m [184] |
|
Skin |
Tail Notch |
| Specs Verified | Yes |
| Design | |
|
|
Tip rocker, camber underfoot, slight tail rocker |
|
|
Medium radius |
|
|
Full Triaxial Carbon Jacket, Sandwich Cap |
|
|
Karuba and Graphene |
| Skimo Co Says | |
| Usage | Dependable ski for longer missions and everyday touring alike |
| Notes | Anti-snow topsheet coating allows for a lower practical weight |
| Bottom Line | Powerful and lightweight touring ski |
| Compare to other Mid-fat Skis | |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
2/16/2025
2/17/2025
Hi Maria, they are fairly similar skis. Both are stiff and precise - great firm snow performance. Neither are particularly damp. The Crux has a bit more rocker, so it's a bit more forgiving, and easier to break out of turns. I would prefer the Zero G for steep skiing, and probably lean towards the Crux as an all-around ski.
Regarding length, you could go either way. Especially with the Zero G, I would err a bit shorter given how long the effective edge is. With the Crux you could go either way. It might come down to how stiff of a boots you have - a stiffer boot will drive a longer ski better, whereas a softer/lighter boot might be better suited to a shorter ski.
Regarding length, you could go either way. Especially with the Zero G, I would err a bit shorter given how long the effective edge is. With the Crux you could go either way. It might come down to how stiff of a boots you have - a stiffer boot will drive a longer ski better, whereas a softer/lighter boot might be better suited to a shorter ski.
2/17/2025
Hi Emmett, thanks for the detailed explanation! I'm curious why you prefer the Zero G for steep terrain specifically. What features make it more suited for that type of skiing? Also, how does the Crux behave in the same type of terrain in comparison?
I have the W Técnica ZeroG tour scout boots. I enjoy skiing steep terrain, faces and couloirs but I'm also looking for a ski that can handle all mountain conditions... from powder to firm, crusty, icy snow... Can I have all of them at onces? :)
I have the W Técnica ZeroG tour scout boots. I enjoy skiing steep terrain, faces and couloirs but I'm also looking for a ski that can handle all mountain conditions... from powder to firm, crusty, icy snow... Can I have all of them at onces? :)
2/18/2025
The Zero G has a longer effective edge, so they'll hold an edge better in firm, steep snow. The Crux would be great for steep skiing as well, but they have a bit more rocker, so less of the edge is gripping the snow in firm conditions. Shoot us an email at help@skimo.co and we can go into more detail!
Answer this question:
2/12/2025
Oh, ps: Who wins the versatility contest between VOLKL 88, BlackLight 88 & Head 93? What, no reviews on the HEAD 93?! Just flexed some in my local shop; they appear to be lively. I agree with SKIMO’s take on the Blizzard skis: NOT easy to ski & long effective turn radius!
2/13/2025
Hi Russell, I'd give the edge to the Head Crux 93 for versatility among the skis you listed. It's got a nice snappy carve while on edge and skis fairly damp, but a touch of tip and tail rocker keeps it maneuverable when needed. And it's a tad wider than the 88's to handle a bit more fresh snow. On firmer snow or spring corn, it'll be a similar experience to the Volkl Rise Above 88 and Blacklight 88, but it'll give you some more to work with outside of those conditions.
Answer this question:
2/12/2025
What “brand” are the precut HEAD skins?
2/13/2025
Ok, I see now they are KOHLA Hybrid Mixmohair.
2/13/2025
Hi Russell, indeed they are made by Kohla.
Answer this question:
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
