Dynastar M-Tour 90 Ski
The Dynastar touring family is growing: the Storks have dropped off the M-Tour 90, making the family much more complete. As with siblings, the M-Tour 90 and 99 share a similar genetic makeup but have very different personalities. For instance, the rocker profile on the M-Tour 99 wants to seek out soft turns whereas the shorter rocker profile and longer effective edge on the M-Tour 90 is more at home on firm, steep terrain. The M-Tour 90 is also quicker edge-to-edge, which will be welcome in consequential terrain. Like its bigger brother, the M-tour 90 sports Dynastar’s Hybrid Core construction, which combines paulownia and PU, creating an exceptionally smooth and supportive ride at minimal weight. This ski likes to go fast but can stop on a dime. If your ski family feels incomplete and needs something that can handle firm conditions, then bring home the M-Tour 90—you’ll be happy you did.
- Hybrid core utilizes PU and Paulwonia to provide an impressive dampness-to-weight ratio.
- 90mm waist width is the new "in" width for a do-it-all ski, according to Europe.
- Long effective edge helps with grip in icy firm conditions.
Update 2024/25: Dynastar has graced us with a new topsheet design.
Specifications | |
Lengths (cm) | 157, 167, 177, 184 |
Weight |
1165g [157] 1245g [167] 1350g [177] 1460g [184] |
Weight (pair) | 2330g [157] 2490g [167] 2700g [177] 2920g [184] |
|
118-88-108 [157] 119-89-109 [167] 120-90-110 [177] 120-90-110 [184] |
Turn |
12m [157] 15m [167] 18m [177] 20m [184] |
Skin |
Round tip, Flat tail |
Specs Verified | Yes |
Design | |
|
Directional rocker tip and tail, camber underfoot |
|
Tapered tip, medium radius, pintail |
|
Hybrid core lightweight construction |
|
Paulownia, PU Hybrid Core |
Skimo Co Says | |
Usage | Touring, all condition skiing |
Notes | Full sidewall, Basalt Fiber reinforcements |
Bottom Line | A stable and versatile "90" |
Compare to other Mid-fat Skis |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
For you, I'd look for a ski designed for inbounds use, but one that is on the less burly side. Perhaps with non-metal construction. There are options in the ~1700g range that should tick your boxes. If your goal is to improve performance on harder snow and reduce chatter, I'd look for a ski with a longer camber profile than the Dynastar M-Pro / M-Tour series. We do not sell anything like that here, though, just lighter touring skis.
I asked before about the backand 95 and alp tracks. Looking for something less stiff and more damp than my blacklight pro 172. I'm 184cm 75kg. This seems nice dimensions as 90 and 177 long. And a good price too. Would they be a bit more forgiving and damp for an intermediate skier who likes to ski whatever the day serves up.
Thanks!
This is the narrower and less known brother to the M Tour 99, which is well reviewed. They are pretty much the same design, just narrower. They ski firm conditions surprisingly well for such a light ski. You could say pretty damp. With a good bit of rocker up front, they ski powder much better then you would expect for a 90mm width ski.
Overall they will be a better all around ski and more fun, then the Blacklight Pro.
As a beginner skier at 5'9, I would go with the 167. It will be easier to learn how to kick-turn and easier to turn in general, especially in tight places. The 177cm would be a lot to manage at your size for someone not yet comfortable with speed.
I looked up the old Cham 87. Not sure I would call it a Pintail either, but it looks like a lot of tail taper for an 87mm ski. These have less.
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.