Please make an appointment for bootfitting.

Skimo Co
SkyRun

Atomic Backland 109 Ski

$799.95

In Stock & Ships Today

Free shipping

Following in the footsteps of the Backland 107, the Backland FR 109 from Atomic is designed for powder, yet, it has notable differences from its predecessor. While the Backland 107 had a distinctly "locked in" personality, the deep rocker lines and shape of the FR 109 give it a more playful and maneuverable personality. Ever conscious of the climate problems we are facing, Atomic utilized more wood and less fiberglass, resin, and metal, helping reduce the ski's carbon footprint while providing a damp and stable ride. To assist with flotation on the deepest and dreamiest days, Atomic paired the FR 109 with a beveled HRZN 3D tip and generous powder rocker, ensuring you can slash and play in fields of powder till your heart is content. Finally, the Ultra Light Woodcore keeps the weight manageable while the hardwood mounting plate ensures your bindings stay securely fastened to your ski. Equally at home playing in fields of powder, searching for side hits on an out track, or straight-lining down a far our apron, the Backland FR 109 is a versatile and fun companion to bring along for soft snow adventures.

  • Full-length Dura Cap Sidewalls transfer power to the edges and resist use and abuse.
  • HRZN 3D Backland tip lowers the swing weight for easier turn initiation while providing excellent float in powder.
  • The Ultra Light Woodcore finds a compelling blend of performance, weight, and durability.
  • More eco-friendly construction and production than previous Backland skis.
  • Powder Rocker helps keep the ski maneuverable while providing floatation in powder.
  • FreeTour profile finds an ideal balance between stability and weight.
Specifications
Lengths (cm) 176, 184, 189
Weight
convert to ounces
1440g [176]
1505g [184]
1555g [189]
Weight (pair) 2880g [176]
3010g [184]
3110g [189]
Sidecut   133.5-109-122.5 [176]
135-109.5-124 [184]
136-110-125 [189]
Turn Radius   17.5m [176]
19m [184]
20m [189]
Skin Fix   Square tip and rounded tail
Specs Verified Yes
Design
Profile   Atomic Powder Rocker (25/55/20)
Shape   Directional
Construction   Poplar and Caruba core with fiberglass laminates
Core   Ultra Light Woodcore
Skimo Co Says
Usage Powder skiing and "not-so-powder" skiing
Notes Beveled tip increases flotation while reducing swing weight
Bottom Line Maneuverable ski that excels everywhere
Compare to other Excess-fat Skis

Related Products

$849.95 From $649.95
$799.95 From $699.95

Questions & Reviews

12/2/2024
Question from Jed Sims
 
Compared to the backland 107, what is the stiffness like?
12/3/2024
Answer from Carlos M
 
Hi Jed,

The overall stiffness is very similar, but I would say just a touch softer in the tips and tails of the 109. The ski also feels like it has a little more energy to it. I think overall, the 109 has been revamped to be a little more playful and slarvy, compared to the 107, which is more directional.
Answer this question:

11/10/2024
Question from Evgenii
 
Hi! Would you be able to hint on the size of the ski for a 5.11' and 160lbs skier? I ski in the Canadian Rockies, would like to make sure the ski doesn't dip driving the ski in deep snow but also have to deal with tight turns in the couloirs and trees. Thanks!
11/11/2024
Answer from Emmett I
 
Hi,

You could go either way, depends on your skiing style. I would tend to think 176cm for most folks your height/weight but if you want to prioritize float and stability at speed you could definitely go 184cm. They'd be a bit less manageable in trees and such.
Answer this question:

11/1/2024
Question from Hadrien Huettenmoser
 
How do you compare them to the Backland 117 from last year ?

Any recs for powder freetouring skis for japan between 110-120mm waist ?
11/4/2024
Answer from Emmett I
 
Hi Hadrien,

The 117 is more of a stiff big-mountain freeride ski, the 109 is playful, poppy, and surfy. And of course narrower :) Both would be great options depending on your skiing style. I'd also take a look at the Armada Locator 112. Poppy, slashy, and very energetic. Feel free to shoot us an email at help@skimo.co and we can get you some more personalized recommendations.
11/21/2024
Answer from Hadrien H
 
Thanks Emmett

And how would you compare the Mfree112 with Armada Locator 112 and Backland 109 ?

I am skier with competitive GS background, not really looking to do butter and ride in switch.

Thanks
Hadrien
11/21/2024
Answer from Emmett I
 
The M-Free will be much damper, and generally way beefier. They'll handle poor snow much better than a lightweight touring ski. More along the lines of the Backland 117 than the Locator or Backland 109.
Answer this question:

9/25/2024
Question from Horse
 
Would this skis construction be strong/stiff enough for 210-220lbs skiers?

I've found many touring skis no matter how wide they are, the nose is too soft and dives into the snow under a heavy rider.
9/25/2024
Answer from Emmett I
 
Hi Horse,

These would definitely be strong enough for you to ski, but as for float I'm not sure. The tip is definitely fairly soft. If float is a priority, the Voile Hyper Drifter and DPS Carbon Pagoda Tour CFL 112 would be good options. Feel free to shoot us an email at help@skimo.co as well if you'd like to go into more detail!
Answer this question:

8/3/2024
Question from Travis
 
Is this a lighter weight Bent 110?
8/3/2024
Answer from Jeff
 
Travis, Safe to say Yes.
We haven't weighed them ourselves yet. They should be comparable to the 107. The new 109 is in different lengths, but should be in the 1500's.
I found the weight of the Bent 110 , 188cm, at 1870g.
Answer this question:

Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.

Model: BACKLAND 109

Follow us on social media

View full screen version