Voile Hyper Manti Ski
Tucked away in the Wasatch, the craftspeople at Voile are hard at work, silently creating skis that thrive in whichever geographic region you call home. Their creation, the Voile Hyper Manti, is no exception. Its rockered profile lends itself to a playful feel in deep snow, while the supportive tail will be right at home in steep couloirs sporting less than ideal conditions. The thick 2mm edges and durable base will shrug off early season impacts while the carbon-weave shaves off the grams. From midwinter powder, to variable spring conditions, to slushy couloirs on the fourth of July - the Voile Hyper Manti is built to ski them all.
- Anti-ice top sheet keeps the extra snow weight away.
- Reinforced mounting area keeps the bindings where they should be.
- Voile Carbon-Weave saves weight while keeping the performance high.
- Laminated paulownia wood core offers an impressive strength to weight ratio.
- Thick 2mm steel edges and sintered base foretell durability.
- Rubber foil provides damping throughout the ski.
| Specifications | |
| Lengths (cm) | 171, 176, 181, 186 |
|
Weight |
1280g [171] 1340g [176] 1410g [181] 1470g [186] |
| Weight (pair) | 2560g [171] 2680g [176] 2820g [181] 2940g [186] |
|
|
134-102-121 [171] 136-103-123 [176] 138-104-124 [181] 140-105-127 [186] |
|
Turn |
17m [171] 18m [176] 18m [181] 19m [186] |
|
Skin |
Rounded tips and tails |
| Specs Verified | Yes |
| Design | |
|
|
Early-rise tip, camber, gradual tail rocker |
|
|
Rounded tip and tail, gradual taper |
|
|
Double woven carbon cap |
|
|
Paulownia |
| Skimo Co Says | |
| Usage | Powder, corn, crud, and more |
| Notes | Made in the USA |
| Bottom Line | A versatile all-arounder |
| Compare to other High-fat Skis | |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
3/10/2023
Looking at this ski over the Hyper V6 as a backcountry daily driver that could handle just about any condition\terrain I come across while out on a tour (faces, trees, chutes) and is easy to ski without having to really give it much thought, and what I am hearing is that this is a great contender for that! Now comes the question of which size... I'm 6'2", 175-180lbs plus pack weight. Normally ski a 184-186 in bounds and am a fairly aggressive skier, but tone it back some in the backcountry. Debating between the 176 and 181 length, just wanting to make sure that with it's more progressive mount point, kick turns won't be an issue. I have M-Tour 99s in 186 length and kick turns are easy on them. Thoughts?
3/11/2023
Hi Steven, go with the 181 for a little more support in your ride. A more progressive mount point will place more ski behind the toe pins than a traditional mount point, so the tips of your skis should come up even quicker in this case. Might feel a little different, but kick turns won't be a problem.
3/17/2023
Gabriel,
I guess I was thinking something more along the lines of the more progressive the mount point, the more ski tail I have to work around when making kick turns. I have a pair that has just a few cm too long of a tail that always gets in the way when planting that first foot on steep slopes.
I guess I was thinking something more along the lines of the more progressive the mount point, the more ski tail I have to work around when making kick turns. I have a pair that has just a few cm too long of a tail that always gets in the way when planting that first foot on steep slopes.
Answer this question:
12/23/2022
Hey Skimo Crew!
I am thinking about getting a new daily driver ski for the PNW. I stuck between these (Hyper Manti), K2 WayBack 106 and then Blizzard 105. These skis would be driven by a beef style boot. Looking for something that can handle a good mix of conditions from firm spring snow, slush and some pow (I do have specific skis for big pow days and mountaineering missions).
I am really curious on how these compare and really why one should choose one or the other.
I am a type III skier and have been touring for almost 10 years and fairly confident diving skis in most conditions.
Thanks!
I am thinking about getting a new daily driver ski for the PNW. I stuck between these (Hyper Manti), K2 WayBack 106 and then Blizzard 105. These skis would be driven by a beef style boot. Looking for something that can handle a good mix of conditions from firm spring snow, slush and some pow (I do have specific skis for big pow days and mountaineering missions).
I am really curious on how these compare and really why one should choose one or the other.
I am a type III skier and have been touring for almost 10 years and fairly confident diving skis in most conditions.
Thanks!
12/23/2022
Hi Justin, the Hyper Manti and K2 Wayback 106 have more of a rockered profile as compared to the Blizzard Zero G 105's more traditional cambered shape. They'll ski a little more playfully, while the Zero G will give you more of that "locked in" turn feeling. The Hyper Manti has almost a 200g edge on the Wayback 106, which will certainly help on the way up, but that the Wayback 106 will give you back on the way down.
They'll all ski the conditions you're going for and will do it well with a beefier boot, so it'll come down to what you want to prioritize. Please reach out to us at help@skimo.co if you'd like to get further into the conversation!
They'll all ski the conditions you're going for and will do it well with a beefier boot, so it'll come down to what you want to prioritize. Please reach out to us at help@skimo.co if you'd like to get further into the conversation!
Answer this question:
9/29/2022
Over on the page for the new TLT X boot, I'm asking a similar question to the one above about this ski. Too much to drive with the TLT X, or a good fit for a lightweight powder ski to pair it with?
9/29/2022
Hey Peter, depending on your expectations they could work, especially on lower-angle terrain. The Hyper Manti is pushing the limits a little and recommend checking out the Voile Hyper V6 as they float very well and will be better suited for the TLT X.
Answer this question:
12/13/2021
This is a pretty intriguing ski, given the weight, surface area and (perhaps) build quality; I have not seen this live, but have a pair of Hypervectors and cannot be more happy about them. Still, I might need something wider than that and these could be a solution. One question I have is whether it is reasonable to use these with TLT8 Carbonios? I talked to a Dynafit rep, and he suggested not to use TLT8 with anything wider than 108 mm underfoot. These are narrower, but getting close to (I am thinking of 181 cm version). Thanks.
12/13/2021
Hi Scythian,
The Hyper Manti is an awesome ski to pair in a quiver with the Hyper Vector! Driving this ski with a TLT8 Carbonio would be pretty conditions dependent. In softer snow, skiing is less demanding, and a TLT8 Carbonio should have no issues with this ski.
However, in firmer snow, you may feel that you are not maximizing the output of the Hyper Manti with a TLT8 Carbonio, and driving such a large ski could cause premature wear and tear on your boots.
The Hyper Manti is an awesome ski to pair in a quiver with the Hyper Vector! Driving this ski with a TLT8 Carbonio would be pretty conditions dependent. In softer snow, skiing is less demanding, and a TLT8 Carbonio should have no issues with this ski.
However, in firmer snow, you may feel that you are not maximizing the output of the Hyper Manti with a TLT8 Carbonio, and driving such a large ski could cause premature wear and tear on your boots.
Answer this question:
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
