Dynastar M-Tour 99 F-Team Ski

Specifications
Lengths (cm)	162, 170, 178, 186
Weight convert to ounces	1160g [162] 1245g [170] 1320g [178] 1395g [186]
Weight (pair)	2320g [162] 2490g [170] 2640g [178] 2790g [186]
Dimensions	125-97-115 [162] 126-98-116 [170] 127-99-117 [178] 127-99-117 [186]
Turn Radius	15m [162] 18m [170] 20m [178] 22m [186]
Skin Fix	Rounded tips, flat notched tails
Specs Verified	All except 178
Profile	Moderate rocker, camber underfoot
Shape	Shorter radius with big rounded tip
Construction	Sandwich with fiber torsion box
Core	Paulownia / PU
Usage	All around backcountry skiing
Notes	New version of the Mythic
Bottom Line	Excellent powder and carving skis in one
Compare to other High-fat Skis

I got the plum guide bindings to go with the Dynastar M Tour 99 at 170cm quick question on mounting the bindings is there a recommendation on what the best position would be for an intermediate/ advanced skier. Thanks

5/17/2023

Answer from Jeff

Naren, The raised marks on the ski is the recommended mounting point. And that is what Skimo recommends to mount at.

5/17/2023

Answer from Narendra M

Thanks Jeff - very helpful as always.

Answer this question:

How does the m-tour 99 compare to the backland 100? I've also eyed the BC Navis. But it's heavy. I'm looking for a spring ski to cover steep skiing and ski mountainering in april/may with the odd chance of gravity assisted freeride. It should be able to handle everything from deep powder to variable/crud, and firm in the steeps. I'm 190 cm/6.3 and come from a 184 cm, which feels too short in powder. Hence, I'm attracted to the backland 100' in 188cm. But which ski performs best across my needs - and which ski is most fun?

5/16/2023

Answer from eric

Hey Rune - Thats a loaded question on which is more fun. They both are, but for what it sounds like you are looking for I think the M-Tour 99 is going to be the more powerful, able to ski all conditions the best out of the two you mentioned. The M-Tour has a pretty flat tail compared to some so it will ski a little longer. Look at the Armada Locator 96 for another strong powerful ski that will ski all conditions well with similar weight.

Answer this question:

Tried the mythic but was only good enough in pow-one dimensional...now I m thinking giving dynastar a second chance.
Have been through Hannibal 96 way too planky and backland 95 too woody and no bouncy. Keep an explore 88 for those long spring ones.
My old qst 99s with kingpins are fun but heavy and less all around backcountrish.
As you can tell with a plethora of boots 1000-1500 grams.
How about the under-radar Hagan boost 99 you don't offer?

5/2/2023

Answer from Jeff

Simon, We think pretty highly of this ski.
It is updated from the Mythic 97, see Brett's detailed description below for the differences.
The very rockered tip makes this ski powder like a wider ski. The Basalt wrapped core makes it damp and torsionally rigid so skis the firm conditions too. Actually rips inbounds.
I like the Hannibal 96 too, but it is rather Traditional, the M 99 is more fun.

Answer this question:

My experience using the Dynastar M-tour 99 ski has been very positive. Having used it a few times in both the California Sierras and Utah, I can say that the ski's lightweight construction makes it a great choice for uphill travel, while its 99 width allows for easy navigation through powder. I was also impressed by the fact that the ski doesn't feel too light when going fast, which made it great for all-around skiing. Overall, I would recommend this ski to anyone who enjoys backcountry skiing

Comment on this review:

Awesome ski. Performs well in a variety of conditions and can be used as a quiver of one though might want to go narrower for very late season tours. No weight penalty compared to the M tour 90. Unlike its predecessor (Mythic 97) you do not need to size up with the ski. Compared to the Zero g 95 a bit less edge hold but skis better and more fun in most other conditions.

Comment on this review:

Hi! Looking at the M-Tour 99s for a midwinter touring ski in the PNW that can handle a variety of conditions. Also looking to take it to Denali next summer. Any thoughts if these are the right skis or if I should be looking for something else? My other touring ski is the Dynafit Blacklight 86 for long spring objectives so looking to go wider

1/21/2023

Answer from Gabriel I

Hi Cara, the M-Tour 99 is a great wider all around ski. It's still fairly light, which you'll enjoy on longer tours, while maintaining enough weight to not get knocked around too much on chunky snow or crud, especially as compared to skis pushing that 1kg mark. The high 90 waist width has proven to be a good performer in both deeper / softer snow as well as harder conditions that you might encounter. Good ski for unknown conditions!

Answer this question:

Hey
I've been skiing the Elan Ripstick 96 for couple of years as all-round skis (resort, touring, powder). I found them quite good on hard packed slopes but I am looking to change them now.

How do you compare them with the Dynastar M-Tour 99 2023version and the new Backland 95. Which on are the most versatile ?

Thanks
Hadrien

11/10/2022

Answer from Tristan M

Hi Hadrien,

The Dynastar M-Tour 99 F-Team has a sizable rocker. Compared with the Ripstick 96, it will be an easier ski to pivot, but less effective edge means the turn radius will be shorter. Also, as a heavier ski, I would anticipate the Ripstick 96 being more damp in variable snow conditions as compared with the M-Tour. The M-Tour 99 is a great midwinter ski, but will not be as good as other ski options in firmer snow conditions.

As for the Atomic Backland 95, this ski has a medium turn radius, and is quite versatile. It has enough float for deeper snow, and is fairly easy to smear in a pinch. This ski will not quite be as energetic as the Ripstick 96 exiting a turn, but it is well adapted for a wide range of conditions. .

If you have further questions, feel free to reach out to help@skimo.co!

11/13/2022

Answer from Hadrien H

Thanks Tristan for the answers.

Any good ski recommendation for light pair that is good on hard slopes and touring ?

Answer this question:

Any insight on binding retention? Doesn’t look like any reinforcement underfoot? Wondering if suitable for a tele mount…

8/16/2022

Answer from Will McD

Hi Tim, the F-Team has a layer of Basalt wood over the less dense Paulownia/PU core. While not as solid as titanal, Basalt still makes for good binding retention and I wouldn't be concerned about using a telemark binding on this ski.

Answer this question:

I am interested in M-tour 99, is the skis suitable for all round, hard/soft, mix? And I want pair them with ATK binding, any recommendation. Also do your shop provide free binding mount service if purchase skis and binding together?

Thanks

5/14/2022

Answer from Will McD

Hey Zesheng, thanks for the question! While the M-Tour may not have the weight and dampness compared to some other skis in the category it does have characteristics that most folks would say work well in just about any condition, which makes for a super fun and enjoyable ski.

As far as bindings go for ATK there are a number of good options! If you wanted a fairy beefy full-featured binding the ATK C-Raider 12 has been a super popular choice for a number of folks. But if you are desiring a lighter and brakeless set up the ATK Kulaur 12 LT Binding still has some elasticity built in while being just hair over 200 grams in weight!

With the purchase of both skis and binding, we do offer a $15 Mount.

Answer this question:

Hey, I am looking at replacing my Blizzard zero g 95 because they are quite beat, I loved them and I am hesitating betwen replacing them or try an other skis like the M-Tour 99, I have also in mind the Dynafit speed or the Black light 95. I am 1,70m and 70 kg, some people said to take the M-tour short, I skied the blizzard 1,70m, my days are usually around +2000m. Any opinion ?
Thank you

11/29/2021

Answer from Zak M

Hey Jojo, thanks for the inquiry. Seems like you have a number of different potential ideas so let me do my best to try and address a few. The M-Tour 99 would be a considerable step up in weight and soft snow performance compared to the Zero 95, and while you might sacrifice a bit of weight on the up and overall hard snow performance the M-Tour 99 is an incredibly fun and very well skiing ski.

Out of the skis that you mention above the Dynafit Blacklight 95 would be probably the most similar to the ZeroG 95. Overall the Blacklight 95 will have a bit softer flex pattern compared to the ZeroG 95, while also having a fair amount more earlier rise tip rocker. With that being said, you could say that the Blacklight 95 would be a bit more friendly in a more variety of snow conditions while still be an incredibly light and nimble ski on the up.

Feel free to give us a shout at help@skimo.co for anymore ski questions!

Answer this question:

Hey all! So I'm looking to replace my ZeroG 85's with something that is still pretty light for long objectives, but a bit wider and looser for late spring variable snow when the ZeroG's would get hooky feeling on the steeps. Wondering if the M-Tour 99 in a 178 (vs 185-190 in my regular skis) would fit the bill given its rocker and some taper. Also presumably easier to throw around and slash vs being pretty locked in on the ZeroG's? Thanks!

10/7/2021

Answer from Jeremy L

Hi Scott. You are fairly correct in your assessment. I think that this ski is going to behave exactly as you want it to and almost anything is going to be easier to throw around than those Zero G's. Feel free to reach out with any more questions.

Answer this question:

Hi guys - any high levels differences in downhill performance from the mythic? Looking at these long days and spring skiing.

6/29/2021

Answer from Brett S

Thanks for your question, Rob. I would say the feel between the two is going to be similar, however, Dynastar has made some improvements to the M-Tour 99 which will make it better than the Mythic on the down. To start, Dynastar added basalt stringers to the ski, which will offer a more damp feel, especially in variable snow conditions. They also tweaked the sidecut a bit to give the M-Tour 99 a slightly longer turn radius which helps with stability at speed compared to the older Mythic (the turn radius is still relatively short when compared to other skis, though). Overall, while both have a surfy feel and are super fun in soft snow the M-Tour with its additions make it the better performer in hard snow. Please let us know if you have any other questions!

Answer this question:

I have the Dynafit TLT 8 boot and the dynafit ST radical binding. I’m 5’6” and am deciding between the dynastar m tour 99 and the dps pagoda tour 94. I’m an intermediate skier. Thoughts on the differences between the 2 skis and also on whether I should get mid 160cm vs 170? I ski in the Adirondacks. Thank you!

5/24/2021

Answer from Brett S

Thanks for your question Elizabeth! Both are excellent skis and would serve you well. The Pagoda Tour 94 is the heaviest of the two and will have the best downhill performance due to this extra heft. The Pagoda also has a slight tail rocker compared to the flat tail of the M-Tour 99, so it will be easier to release the tail to scrub away speed. The M-Tour 99, as the name suggests is wider underfoot, making it the better performer for deeper snow. It is also ~170g lighter per ski, which is beneficial for those big vertical days. Overall, if you value performance on the down, go with the Pagoda. If you are after something that is still fun to ski, but a little easier on the legs, go with the M-Tour. In terms of sizing, the 162 (M-Tour) or 165 (Pagoda) would be what we recommend! Please let us know if you have any other questions!

Answer this question:

Dynastar M-Tour 99 F-Team Ski

Free shipping

Related Products

Questions & Reviews

Compare (0)

Follow us on social media

Information

Customer Service

My Account

Extras