SCARPA F1 XT Boot
At the same time and place every year, the boot wizards at SCARPA emerge from their R&D dungeons to see how their creations are being used. It was during such an emergence they noticed the F1 LT being pushed farther and harder than ever anticipated. With ideas in their heads for the next best thing, they retreated back from whence they emerged, spending the next year testing different brews of boots until finally, they emerged with the F1 XT.
Losing none of the mountaineering chops that made the LT an instant hit but gaining the progressivity found in many heavier options, the F1 XT is a boot that seriously excels in many areas. Keeping the generous 72° range of motion of its siblings, the XT is no slouch on the skin track. The stiff 3D Lambda Torsion Frame technology on the lower combined with the Carbon Grilamid cuff ensures confident and precise performance. Notably, no carbon in the lower means that this boot can be punched and adjusted, unlike the F1 LT, so even the gnarliest bunions can be accommodated. Finally, SCARPA opted for a cuff/instep bucke and burly cam-lock power strap for maximum durability.
If you can’t decide if you’re here for speed touring, mountaineering, or pushing the descent, the F1 XT will fit the bill perfectly.
- Buckles and a cam-lock power strap are stout and durable, especially within this category.
- Race-ready 72° range of motion allows for efficient climbing.
- Simple and clean Speed Lock LT ski/walk mechanism minimizes ice buildup and allows for adjustable forward lean between 11°, 13°, and 15°.
- Optional rear spoiler can further adjust forward lean by ± 2°.
- Grilamid FG LFT lower helps provide a progressive flex and is punchable if need be.
- Moldable liner from Intuition allows for a truly customized fit.
- RECCO helps with search and rescue efforts should you take the wrong turn.
- Italian ancestry.
Specifications | |
Weight |
1120g [27] 1194g [28] |
Weight (pair) | 2240g [27] 2388g [28] |
|
2 + Cam Buckle Power Strap |
Boot Sole |
270mm [24] 278mm [25] 286mm [26] 294mm [27] 302mm [28] 310mm [29] 319mm [30] 327mm [31] |
Binding |
Tech only |
Cuff |
72° |
Forward |
11°, 13°, 15° ± 2° w/ spoiler |
Specs Verified | Yes |
Design | |
|
Grilamid FG LFT shell, Carbon Grilamid LFT cuff, synthetic cloth tongue |
|
Intuition Tour L T2 |
|
Vibram UFO LT |
Skimo Co Says | |
Usage | Lightweight touring and ski mountaineering with an eye on the downhill |
Notes | Has a burly cam buckle power strap |
Bottom Line | A classic touring boot gets a downhill performance boost |
Compare to other Touring Boots |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
Since i bought a new all mountain (85)more resort oriented skis with a griffons, could i use the LT with them since are multinorm binding? I know the Lt are not gripwalk, that will be easier, but if not any other binding non tech that could use this boots
Thanks a lot
Unfortunately this boot will not be compatible with an alpine binding, even an MNC alpine binding - this is a "tech only" boot, which means that the toe and heel lugs are not designed to interface with an alpine binding system. You may be able to put it in there, but it would not be recommended or safe.
MNC bindings can be used with GripWalk or ISO 9523-rated touring soles, but many lightweight boots do not conform to any standard other than tech.
In terms of downhill performance only for a ski around 1100-1200g/ski for an intermediate skier. Worried about stiffness and seeking fun!
Fit-wise, they are different! The Kilo and the Solar have roomier lasts width-wise, although they are different shapes, and the Solar has a bit lower instep. Fit is very important, so you'll want to choose the one that fits you best. If you'd like to go more in-depth with fit, please email us at help@skimo.co and we can help!
In terms of downhill performance, the F1 XT and the Solar will be stiffer than the Kilo and can be pushed a bit harder. The Kilo will walk the best, and is the lightest in the group.
I bought a pair of these in Europe last season before they were available in the US. Typical euros...so pretentious!
Look bro, they only have 2 buckles. I've seen you huck those cliffs man...and anything short of 5 buckles just won't handle your awesomeness.
And no way latex skimo dude...they are way too heavy for you, monsieur. You deserve 100% French carbon fiber for your petite feet.
Like I said: don't buy these boots. Especially if you wear a size 30.0. I'm going to do the world a favor by buying another pair for next year so you don't have to.
In summary: These boots suck! 5-Star
The F1 XT is a bit damper and more progressive feeling than the Peak, but not a lot. They're both lightweight, tongueless boots. The bigger difference would be the fit, which is narrower and lower volume on the F1 XT than the Peak. It is very likely that one will fit you much better than the other, and the one that fits better will be the one that skis better.
If you are considering new boots, fill out our online boot fitter and we can help with your search!
I actually purchased the F1 XT over the F1 LT pretty much entirely due to the buckle over the lower shell (I did not get along well with the Boa). I felt that the Boa was not doing a good enough job securing my lower-volume foot, and when I cranked it down tight enough, it was uncomfortable. Of course, buying a new boot always has a little bit of uncertainly, but so far, I have about 15 days on the boots and I'm very happy with my choice. Heel hold and comfort have been excellent and I like the security and durability of the buckles.
The Skorpius is a significantly stronger boot on the downhill, but the XT will walk a little bit better (just a little - the Skorpius isn't bad at all when you open up the cuff). There isn't a huge amount of weight between them, honestly, so I would personally go with the one that fits better. For me, the Skorpius was too wide in the forefoot, and slightly low in the instep.
Overall, I do think the XT will work better than the LT for lower-volume feet, especially with the right footbed.
The Atomic seems a bit soft when skiing, but it could be me.
I have always used the Atomic Backland 85 + Atomic Backland binding.
Recently, I bought the Hagan Boost 94 Pow + ATK Raider 13 EVO.
Will the Atomic be strong enough? How does the Scarpa F1 XT compare to this?
My weight is 65kg and I am about 178cm and charge soft to semi rigid (so not hard).
These flex stiffer than the Backland Carbon, but are in the same general weight and performance category. They are a bit lower volume over the instep than the Backland Carbon. Either one would be okay with that ski, although you may be able to get more out of it with a beefier boot. It all depends on preference and whether you want to optimize more for the downhill or uphill. If you were to buy a new boot with the intention of getting significantly higher overall downhill performance than the Backland, I would consider something a bit beefier than the F1 XT. But if you just want a bit more stiffness, they will give you that.
Congrats on the new skis! I would not recommend the F1 XT for the sort of skiing you're thinking of, unfortunately. It is a lightweight, race-plus style touring boot that is best suited to lighter skis and longer days in the backcountry. I do not think it would be satisfying or durable enough for aggressive resort skiing, especially with a 108mm resort ski. It is an awesome boot, but not designed for that kind of use.
My recommendation, if you are looking for new touring boots, is to fill out our boot fitter , and we can help guide you toward a pair that will fit you and suit your needs.
The Dynafit Tigard is a high-volume, medium-width boot with lots of room over the instep. It is one of the best options for a high-performing resort-capable touring boot, if it fits you. It is beefy enough to stand up to regular resort usage, but it does have a good enough walk mode to be reasonable to hike in and take for shorter tours. Could be worth trying on!
The question is, do I order a 25 or 26 in F1 XT?
24.5 and 25 Scarpa shells are the same, so yes, if you wanted to get close to the fit of a 24.5 from another manufacturer, the 25 Scarpa would be the closest. It will be very slightly roomier than a 24/24.5 from a brand that does not use Scarpa sizing.
Ive been using a 24 F1LT and love it but wanted to go a bit bigger to have the option to add a warmer liner for higher altitude missions.
Was hoping to go up to a 24.5. Would that be the same shell size as the 25?
I would say they're still in a different class. The Skorpius is more in the class of the original F1, which is a step up from the XT. But I would say the Skorpius is even stiffer than the F1. The tongue makes a big difference, as well as whatever magic they worked to get the Skorpius to feel so solid. The XT is a great skiing boot in its class of tongueless, race-plus touring boots, but the Skorpius is a step up.
I’ve had hundreds of days on both the F1LT and the Alien RS and wore a few holes through those gaiters fairly quickly, but although the XT gaiters look burlier (and probably add to the weight) the new gaiters durability sucks in comparison to their lighter predecessors.
It’s a shame because they skin and ski great.
- the gators are pretty much destroyed on both pairs. Pretty standard for this sort of boot but I'm guessing they're less durable than the f1 lt gators. Maybe because they bunch up under the buckle and rip.
- the sole got torn up on the first rock scramble. Again pretty standard, though I'm skeptical of light colored rubber
- I mostly skied without the power strap, it feels too stiff. This should give you a good idea of my style of skiing.
- I think the flex feels a bit more forgiving than the f1 lts and the toe buckle is more secure but less useful on the uphill. I'm not sure this is a good thing. I also think mine tend to have a bit less play in the lock mechanism.
- I got one pair punched for my tailor bunyon but they were only comfortable doing a few mm. This isn't quite enough, and is my main problem with these boots. The tech wasn't convinced that the fiberglass reinforced shell is actually more forgiving than the carbon on on the lts. But maybe it won't crack at the hinge like the lts
- I've skied them back to back with the zg peak carbon. The peak clearly had more lateral stiffness, I think the flex on the XTs is nicer and they ski like a slightly heavier boot ( which they are). Size wise the 27.5 peak is about right in the middle of the 27 and 28 scarpas.
- the black shells suck under summer California sun
I also managed to get some extra space around my toes by dremeling off a bit of the rubber bootboard. The bootboards in mine curled upwards near the toes and were higher than the bottom of the boot. Super easy mod and relieved pressure on the tops of my toenails.
You could, and people certainly do, but we wouldn't necessarily recommend it for most skiers/conditions. It would work in powder! But if conditions got less than ideal, you would be very aware that you're in an 1100 gram boot. It would be very much at the limit of the boot.
Really stoked on the combination of these two boots--think I'll be even more stoked w/ the XT
Wearing them side by side, they have pretty different flex profiles. Both have a bit of take-up, and then the XT hits its wall quickly. The wall is fairly strong for a boot of this weight, but there isn't really much beyond it. The Dalbello has a smoother ramp-up into a fairly solid flex, but you sink a ways into it first. I think I would call the XT stiffer-feeling on the floor, but I also think the Dalbello would do a better job of smoothing out variable snow and might ski better for a heavier rider. Also worth noting that there is a lot more room in the cuff of the Dalbello than in the XT. I actually can't get it quite tight enough for my calves (which are skinny) whereas I have plenty of adjustment left in the XT. The fit of the lower shell is very similar.
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.