Are you looking for a simple, durable, all-around ski touring binding? Do you want brakes, magnetic risers, elastic heel travel, and a fully adjustable release without unnecessary weight? Would you like to adorn your skis with hints of polished aluminum, steel, and fine Italian metallurgy?
If you answered yes to any of the above questions, the RT 11 Evo may be for you. This binding is the flagship of ATK's lightweight, full-featured touring category. The engineers at ATK have managed to cram nearly every sought-after feature on the binding market into these expertly machined pieces of ski jewelry. Compared to its predecessor, the RT 10 Evo, the new RT 11 Evo integrates a release adjustment feature into the toepiece, inherited from the freeride-oriented Raider Evo series. This new toe piece allows for a large adjustment range that will accommodate just about everyone.
Rest assured, the best features of the RT 10 Evo are carried forward, including ATK's signature magnetic heel risers and exceedingly user-friendly Evo brake system. To transition this binding, simply rotate the heel and start skinning. To go downhill, turn it again and enjoy an effortless step-in thanks to the independent cam-lock heel pins. Both risers can be accessed with a pole, so no more bending over to rotate your heel in the middle of the skin track! For aggressive skiing, the elastic travel at the heel allows your skis to flex freely during compressions while the adjustable toe will allow you to dial up your retention with confidence.
With so many features and so little weight, the RT 11 Evo is an excellent choice for almost any backcountry skier.
Cam Release System allows for easy step-in and crisp release values.
Easy Entry System allows for easy entry into the toe piece. Clever!
Elastic Response System allows the ski to compress while skiing, keeping your release values consistent.
Evo Braking System is easy and intuitive to use.
Magneto heel risers help tame steep skin tracks and are securely stowed when not in use.
Snow Pack Proof Toe resists the buildup of snow under the toe wings, increasing reliability in deep snow.
Toe piece allows the toe piece to be calibrated with the heel, allowing for a wider range of release that is more reliable.
I have these binding on Blizzard Zero G95. I like them except for the part I think called "elastic heel travel". I guess it allows for when skis flex on very uneven terrain? However, when going uphill with the heel raisers up when I have to stomp hard (I am relatively heavy (200lb) and stomp hard) on steep terrain to get better footing the heel travels activates and ends up twisting the heel piece out of place, with sometimes turning it fully 180 degress and bindings lock. Is there a way to disable it? I've been liking the ATK bindings otherwise. Which other lightweight models I should consider for my next setup that dont have heel travel? I've been considering Haute Route or similar for my next lightweight setup.
Svetoslav- That is the downside to rearward travel on heels pieces. Any binding that use a screw tension plate will definitely not have travel. Haute route will get rid of rearward travel and allow you to keep the other feartures of the ATK heel.
Mounting these with an Orb Freebird (90mm waist). Would you recommend the 86mm brakes or 91mm? Also, any hesitation for a 6'2, 190lb skier (typical ATK release value around 9-10). Think I'm going to go ahead and order now since spring has arrived early in the Tetons.... :)
Hi Casey, the 86mm would be close (fine if you carefully bend them), but the 91mm wouldn't be too wide at all. If you don't mind a little bit of extra weight, the Raider 13 Evo would give you more room to turn the release up if needed, but I would think these are totally fine.
Answer this question:
1/19/2026
Question from
Greg Parker
I'm a bigger guy (6'2, 210lbs with gear, strong skier) and I've been running the newest ATK Haute Route+ on all of my setups lately. It's everything I want in a binding, but I occasionally pre-release on my fatter setup in bad snow. Wondering if this RT11, with it's additional 1 release value, elastic heel, and adjustable toes would make a significant difference, or if I'd be better off bumping up to something like a Raider 12 SL or Freeraider 14 SL. Trying to keep things as light as possible so I'd be removing the brakes on whatever binding I got.
Greg- The first thing is to figure out if you are prereleasing vertically or horizontally. Vertically the only thing you can do is get a higher release valued binding. If its lateral there are a couple of possibilities. Reach out to help@skimo.co and we can discuss further.
Would this binding pair well with the Dynafit Free 107 173 length? I weigh 175 and am a moderately advanced/aggressive skier. I'm in the PNW (Mt Hood). According to ATK the Raider 13 Evo would be a better choice but there seems to be little difference between the two other than the toe piece and the toe piece.
Daniel, Yes, it will be perfectly fine. They are the exact same binding other then the top release value, 11 vs 13. And 11 should be plenty for you.
Answer this question:
2/11/2025
Question from
Tim
Probably has been asked 1000x times before on other product listings, but can a moderately aggressive skier really notice the difference of the freeride spacers?
It depends a bit on the width of the ski in question. The wider and heavier the ski - and the firmer the conditions - the more you will notice the freeride spacer. In perfect powder, you'd never know, and it doesn't really make sense on skis under 95mm or so. The idea is to give you more power transfer to the edge and support on hard landings, and wider skis put more force on your boots and therefore will increase the perceived benefits!
Hi Tim! I've put less on more and still see the light of day. Now, I don't suggest folks do the same, but these guidelines are provided from a general perspective and don't factor in the varying nuances that may make a binding appropriate or not. That said, without knowing all the details, I believe the RT 11 Evo is capable of handling a ~1700g ski with little trouble. Regarding the brake widths, a 102mm of this binding will fit a 105mm ski. Thanks!
Hey folks, sorry for having so many questions. I'm planning to order these bindings from you along with some Trab 104s.. but I'm nervous because of my bad experiences with the push-button brakes on the old Raiders. They do not always deploy! You said that you think the new Evo ones have more "umph" to them... is that something you'd still say after having more experience? Are the Evo brakes on the RT 11 just the same brakes -- i.e. are the springs as powerful? I'm kind of tempted to just go back to tried and true Dynafit ST, because the brakes are reliable. But I would love to have a lighter more elastic binding.
We haven't seen any issues with brake deployment on the Evos - and they don't have the issue the push buttons have had with deploying them with the boot clipped into the heel.
Answer this question:
12/26/2024
Question from
Paddy Gonia
What is the delta value of the RT 11 EVO, and how much of a shim is reasonable with this binding (from your experience)?
Thanks for providing this incredibly useful resource - long time lurker, first time poster! Cheers
Paddy- The delta of the RT 11 Evo is +10mm. ATK makes a 4mm shim that would work perfectly for that binding called Speed Shims. They come with screws making the upgrade easy.
I am pretty sure that the Raider Evo Toe Shims will *not* work with the RT 11 Evo. The front hole pattern is 30/45 x 35 same as the old Rraiders. So presumably that means that you want the Raider Toe Shims, even though Skimo's page on this says "not compatiable with Evo". It's very confusing but hopefully the Skimo folks can update the various pages on this so we know what to order.
Eric- You are correct the drilling is different on the RT 11 Evo. I miss spoke the Raider shim could work but not a perfect fit. The shim would need a little customizing to work. The best solution for the RT 11 Evo is the Speed shim which matches perfectly to the toe.
Answer this question:
12/19/2024
Question from
Eric S
Is there any reason I could not buy these, plus a set of wider Evo brakes, and swap them out? That way I would have the Raider autobrake but with the lighter toe pieces for my powder skis. I can’t think of any reason to go for the heavier toe of the Raider Evo. Thoughts?
Hi Eric, yes you can, and I think it's odd ATK doesn't offer these wider. Sure the mounting pattern is narrower, but plenty of folks use that pattern on wider skis. If you reach out via email, we can swap brakes for you to avoid the expense of an extra set.
Ben, The brakes are removable but you need to have the brake cover to replace and protect the brake area after removal. You do not need to remove the heel piece from the ski.
Answer this question:
11/10/2024
Question from
Nico
What is the difference between these bindings and the raider 11 evo?
Same: both have a toe adjustment to help with release values, cam release system, two magnetic heel risers, and the evo brake system.
Different: for practical usage, you gain 5mm more of BSL travel on the Raider model along with wider brake options. The mounting pattern is wider on the Raider series, allowing for more power transmission for those capable of such discernment.
Answer this question:
8/9/2024
Question from
Rhys
It seems like this updated RT 11 Evo is almost the exact same weight as the RT 10 Evo, in spite of the larger/more featured toe piece? Have you guys managed to confirm that yet?
We have not gotten our hands on these yet, unfortunately! We hope to have them soon. When we do receive them, we will verify the weight, and you will see a "yes" appear next to the "Specs Verified" line in the specs sheet above (and we will change the weight specification to whatever we actually record).
To follow up Rhys, these ended up coming in about an ounce heavier, all in the toe piece. This is no doubt due to the release-value adjustment and the quick-trigger on the wing pivot.