ATK Raider 13 Evo Binding
The Raider 13 Evo is ATK’s new flagship binding, and it’s ready to take you to the top of the mountain and get you down in just about any manner you desire. A couple of key features make it stand out from past models and the competition: automatic ski brake retraction and a toe release adjustment, respectively.
After testing for a season in Europe, ATK is releasing into the US the Evo brake system in lieu of the push-button mechanism found on other Raider models. Simply turn the heel 180 degrees when transitioning and an internal mechanism will do the rest. When heading uphill, step or push on the brake to make it auto-lock into place. At the top, spinning the heel again will auto-deploy the brakes so you’ll never forget. While you’ll no longer have the option of skiing with the brakes up, ATK makes plenty of brakeless bindings for that.
ATK also added lateral release adjustment in the toe of the Raider Evo series. This, to be clear, does *not* mean that the binding releases laterally at the toe like alpine bindings. Experienced tech binding users know that toes and heels work in conjunction during lateral release, evidenced by the fact that locking your toe effectively disables the release. The new lateral toe adjustment means that both are adjusted in unison which expands the range of release values available: in the case of the Evo 13 a whopping 5-13 adjustment will work for most backcountry skiers out there.
The new features combined with ATKs renowned precision machining makes the ATK Raider Evo 13 a supremely functional and reliable touring binding at a weight that is unmatched in the category. This is a gear choice you won’t likely come to regret.
- Exquisitely machined 7075 aluminum, POM, and stainless steel for a rock-solid build.
- Adjustable lateral and vertical release over a wide range of 5-13 due to toe spring adjustment.
- Optional freeride spacers support your heel while having a decent anti-friction mechanism.
- Evo autobrake system means no fuss transitions…the brakes lock and deploy automatically.
- Snowpack proof toe piece is relatively sealed to prevent dangerous snow creep under the wings.
- 25mm adjustment in the heel track so you can adapt to a few boots with one mount.
- Magnetic risers offer multiple climbing heights with a flick of your finger or pole.
- Cam release heel pins work independently for smooth step-in and vertical release.
- 14mm elastic travel in the heel means you won’t eject if you overflex your skis.
- Uphill Hardness Variator lets you tweak the toe tension for skinning.
Update 2024/25: The baseplate is now made from aluminum for even more durability. Heel gap markings have been laser etched on the heel pins to help adjust for different boots. Total weight including screws is within a few grams.
| Specifications | |
|
Weight |
382g [97mm] |
| Weight (pair) | 764g [97mm] |
|
Boot |
Tech |
|
Brakes |
97, 102, 108, 120 |
|
BSL |
25mm |
|
Riser |
2 + flat |
|
Vertical |
5-13 |
|
Lateral |
5-13 |
|
Crampon |
Yes |
| Specs Verified | Yes |
| Design | |
|
|
Aluminum alloys, POM, stainless steel |
| Skimo Co Says | |
| Usage | Free touring, general backcountry skiing |
| Notes | Toe adjustment offers a wide range of release values |
| Bottom Line | The "Evo"lved flagship ATK binding |
| Compare to other Full-featured Bindings | |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
12/16/2024
I just bought some Blizzard ZeroG with a 95mm waist. I wanted to pair them with Raider 13 Evo (switch from my current skis) but the 97mm brake is too narrow. Is it possible to just buy a wider brake, and if so, would you recommend a 102mm or 108mm for these skis? Thanks
12/16/2024
Hi Andy, the 97mm brake works great with that ski. Maybe you had your brakes swapped or something? Did you try them deployed?
Answer this question:
12/11/2024
Hello, I’m thinking of springing for these on a touring ski with a 105mm waist. Will the 102 brakes work? Or should I size up to 108?
12/11/2024
Hi Johnny!
The 102mm brakes would work great for you. They would not require bending and maintain a tight, secure fit. Thanks!
The 102mm brakes would work great for you. They would not require bending and maintain a tight, secure fit. Thanks!
Answer this question:
11/12/2024
Does the ATK Raider 13 Evo come with the free ride spacers?
11/12/2024
Hi Mike,
No, it does not - only the Freeraider 15 from the Evo line includes the Freeride Spacers. We do sell them separately on our ATK Binding Parts listing.
No, it does not - only the Freeraider 15 from the Evo line includes the Freeride Spacers. We do sell them separately on our ATK Binding Parts listing.
Answer this question:
11/8/2024
What brake width would you recommend for a 112mm ski? Would the 108mm be adequate?
Thanks,
Andrew
Thanks,
Andrew
11/8/2024
Andrew, the 108mm will work on the 112 skis. No more.
Answer this question:
8/16/2024
Are you guys able to sell just the toe piece of the Raider 13 EVO? I noticed it wasn't available in the ATK toe piece section of the website. Are you able to order it directly from ATK? Thanks!
8/16/2024
Hi Jack,
Looks like we might be able to. Please contact us at help@skimo.co and we will look into it.
Looks like we might be able to. Please contact us at help@skimo.co and we will look into it.
Answer this question:
Disclaimer: I have the "Moment Voyager" branded version of these - the only difference is the ramp delta out of the box is +7mm and they come with the free-ride spacers.
I've used the non-EVO version of the freeraiders for the past few seasons. Upgraded to these ones to test out the auto-locking brakes. I think the feature does add value/ease to the binding, but it's not a huge change. Does make it slightly easier to transition while keeping the skis on - spinning the tower vs pushing a "button". The manual brake locking feature of non-EVO models was a little finicky, but easy enough once figured out. Admittedly nicer to just spin the tower and "stomp" on brake when clicking in for uphill.
The added release value adjustment for the toe is a great idea - I haven't had any crashes or pre-releases though, so can't really comment on a noticed difference. Appear to have the same performance of previous toe pieces. Anyone know what the equivalent release value was on previous (free)raider toes?
TL;DR: EVO has a few nice-to-have features compared to non-EVO versions, but if you can find a deal on non-EVO bindings, you may not notice the difference. Still the best full-featured binding around in my opinion.
I've used the non-EVO version of the freeraiders for the past few seasons. Upgraded to these ones to test out the auto-locking brakes. I think the feature does add value/ease to the binding, but it's not a huge change. Does make it slightly easier to transition while keeping the skis on - spinning the tower vs pushing a "button". The manual brake locking feature of non-EVO models was a little finicky, but easy enough once figured out. Admittedly nicer to just spin the tower and "stomp" on brake when clicking in for uphill.
The added release value adjustment for the toe is a great idea - I haven't had any crashes or pre-releases though, so can't really comment on a noticed difference. Appear to have the same performance of previous toe pieces. Anyone know what the equivalent release value was on previous (free)raider toes?
TL;DR: EVO has a few nice-to-have features compared to non-EVO versions, but if you can find a deal on non-EVO bindings, you may not notice the difference. Still the best full-featured binding around in my opinion.
Comment on this review:
6/10/2024
Curious if you think the toe spring adjustment on these offers substantially better/more consistent/safer release compared to ATK RT 10 EVOs? - Older, conservative skier with bindings set around 7 typically.
6/11/2024
Hi Dave,
We've found the normal ATK bindings (non-Evo) to be quite reliable in our testing. Overall, I would say that the skiers most likely to benefit from the adjustable toe spring are those at either the very bottom of the release range or near the top, where being able to tune the release characteristics of the toe might help ensure the consistency of the release. In your case, I think you could use either with good confidence.
We've found the normal ATK bindings (non-Evo) to be quite reliable in our testing. Overall, I would say that the skiers most likely to benefit from the adjustable toe spring are those at either the very bottom of the release range or near the top, where being able to tune the release characteristics of the toe might help ensure the consistency of the release. In your case, I think you could use either with good confidence.
Answer this question:
5/13/2024
Is it possible to mount these bindings without the brakes?
5/14/2024
Hi Chase,
Yes and no. It is technically possible to mount them without the brake, but ATK does not recommend it, and we do not mount them this way. There is no brake cover available for them, so you would have an exposed brake mechanism and a hole in your binding where the brake was. If you want a brakeless Raider, I would look at the non-Evo options, which can be set up brakeless and have a brake seat cover available for them!
Yes and no. It is technically possible to mount them without the brake, but ATK does not recommend it, and we do not mount them this way. There is no brake cover available for them, so you would have an exposed brake mechanism and a hole in your binding where the brake was. If you want a brakeless Raider, I would look at the non-Evo options, which can be set up brakeless and have a brake seat cover available for them!
Answer this question:
3/26/2024
Hello,
I plan to build a wide AT setup that I can occasionally use in the rare resort pow (read: crud) days. Haven't clicked the button yet but very likely I'll be buying the Pagoda tour 106 C2 from you guys.
Weighing the binding choice now. From the resort downhill performance, sensation, and safety perspectives, how much do I lose by going with these Raider instead of the Shift? Thank you!
I plan to build a wide AT setup that I can occasionally use in the rare resort pow (read: crud) days. Haven't clicked the button yet but very likely I'll be buying the Pagoda tour 106 C2 from you guys.
Weighing the binding choice now. From the resort downhill performance, sensation, and safety perspectives, how much do I lose by going with these Raider instead of the Shift? Thank you!
3/26/2024
Hi Eric, you'll lose some suspension, dampness, and alpine release characteristics going with a tech binding vs. what is basically an alpine binding with the Shift. If your priority is resort downhill performance, you can't beat the Shift (or Cast, etc). If you want to lean more on the touring performance side, go for the Raider. The Raider will handle the occasional resort day fine. Feel free to reach out to us at help@skimo.co to get into more details!
3/26/2024
Eric, Asking us Skimo guys, we will always say go with the ATK. Over the Shifts you will lose Lots of weight. Under most conditions, I would say you wouldn't really notice any DH performance or sensation. In powder everything is great, icy conditions would be the only time you may feel less. And Safety is always hard to quantify. Tech bindings are simple and different, but seem to release fine when needed. There are certain falls that hurt many people on Alpine bindings, same for touring.
The Pagoda skis make for great crossover skis. Fun everywhere.
The Pagoda skis make for great crossover skis. Fun everywhere.
Answer this question:
3/2/2024
HI
Is the spacing of the mounting screws the same as in the R12 binding?
Is the spacing of the mounting screws the same as in the R12 binding?
3/2/2024
Hi Wu, the Evo has the same mounting pattern as the current Raider 12, but there have been versions of the Raider with a different pattern in previous years. Please see our list of mounting patterns for details.
Answer this question:
1/19/2024
Team,
What is the delta? Do these come with toe shims? Thank you.
What is the delta? Do these come with toe shims? Thank you.
1/19/2024
Hi Mike, these are +11 as documented in our list of pin heights. If you click the "Add ATK Binding Parts" box you can add some 4mm shims to make that +7.
Answer this question:
1/7/2024
I'm curious if the brakes are more positive (stronger) than in the earlier R12, push button variety? I have found (on that older model) that if I don't regularly clean and grease the area where the brakes fold up, then they do not release. Of course, maintenance is the price we pay for ultra-light gear. On the other hand, I've never had any problem, in spite of doing no maintenance at all, on my tried and true Dynafit Vertical STs.
1/8/2024
Hi Eric! These brakes do seem to have a little more grr to them. Although the push button variety is still a favorable design, the new mechanisms involved within the Evo seem quite reliable. Time will tell with this newer binding, but the early reports share all good things!
Answer this question:
1/1/2024
Compare/contrast this ATK Raider EVO with the Dynafit Rotation ST?
1/1/2024
Hi Daus,
They are both burly, freeride-oriented tech bindings! The main difference will be the weight. The ATK is 377 grams per binding, compared to the Rotation at just over 600. So a pretty significant weight savings. Much of that weight is in the rotating toe of the Rotation, which offers some extra lateral elasticity and very secure retention. However, the Raider Evo bindings also have good lateral elasticity in the heel, and adjustable release in the toe makes them very reliable. I would not hesitate to ski either quite aggressively. The Rotation is also a truly gapless binding - while the ATK Raiders do have elastic travel in the heel to allow for length compensation during ski flex, they are still set with a 4mm gap. So they are not technically gapless.
One other formal difference is that the Rotation is TUV certified - this makes it unique among tech bindings. But in our experience, both release very accurately.
They are both burly, freeride-oriented tech bindings! The main difference will be the weight. The ATK is 377 grams per binding, compared to the Rotation at just over 600. So a pretty significant weight savings. Much of that weight is in the rotating toe of the Rotation, which offers some extra lateral elasticity and very secure retention. However, the Raider Evo bindings also have good lateral elasticity in the heel, and adjustable release in the toe makes them very reliable. I would not hesitate to ski either quite aggressively. The Rotation is also a truly gapless binding - while the ATK Raiders do have elastic travel in the heel to allow for length compensation during ski flex, they are still set with a 4mm gap. So they are not technically gapless.
One other formal difference is that the Rotation is TUV certified - this makes it unique among tech bindings. But in our experience, both release very accurately.
Answer this question:
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
