Please make an appointment for bootfitting.

Skimo Co
SkyRun
ATK

ATK Raider 11 Evo Binding

$699.95 From $599.95

In Stock & Ships Today

Free shipping

The Raider Evo series sits atop the ATK throne as their flagship binding, with the Raider 11 Evo positioned to serve lighter-weight skiers. Setting itself apart from other, non-Evo Raider bindings, the Raider 11 Evo has automatic brakes and release adjustment in the toe.

With non-Evo Raider bindings, the brake is deployed and locked with a manually pressed button, positioned under the heel of the boot. While many find this system intuitive to use, the button can be a little tricky to operate with bulky gloves, which can be a problem on cold winter days. With the Raider 11 Evo, the required heel rotation of 180° either engages or disengages the brake automatically, ensuring the brakes will always be present to help arrest your ski in the case of a fall. The Raider 11 Evo also features toe-piece release adjustment. It is important to note the Raider11 Evo does not release laterally at the toe like that of an alpine binding. Instead, this adjustment allows the toe piece to better match the release value of the heel, thus allowing an impressive adjustment range, which is 3-11 in this case.

With a similar feature set to non-Evo bindings, the Raider 11 Evo has 14mm of rearward elastic travel in the heel, allowing the binding to compensate for ski compression, helping prevent pre-release when skiing aggressively. Two heel risers plus a flat mode ensure you'll have just the right climbing angle for steep skin tracks and the Uphill Hardness Variator allows for the compensation of worn-out toe inserts, thus reducing the likelihood of twisting out of the binding while skinning. The Cam Release System provides easy step-in and adjustable release while the burly aluminum construction ensures the binding stands up to serious use and abuse.

If you are a lighter-weight skier and want a compelling feature set without excess weight, the Raider 11 Evo is for you.

  • Independent vertical and lateral release adjustment between 3-11.
  • Machined 7075 aluminum, POM, and stainless steel results in a stout binding.
  • Evo brake is automatic and ensures you won't forget to deploy your brake.
  • Snowpack Proof toe piece resists snow buildup under the toe wings, meaning you can step into your toe piece every time.
  • 25mm of BSL adjustment accommodates multiple boots without a remount.
  • Magnetic heel risers resist being accidentally engaged and provide 24mm and 49mm riser heights.
  • Cam Release System ensures smooth step-in and adjustable release values.
  • Uphill Hardness Variator allows for adjustable toe clamping force in tour mode to help compensate for worn-out toe inserts.
  • Optional toe shim reduces heel ramp, allowing for a more neutral stance.
  • Optional freeride spacer fills up the void under the heel, allowing for better power transfer to the ski.

Update 2024/25: The baseplate is now made with aluminum for durability and the heel gap is laser etched on the heel pins. Weight barely budged.

Specifications
Weight
convert to ounces
382g [97mm]
Weight (pair) 764g [97mm]
Boot Compatibility   Tech
Brakes (mm)   86, 91, 97, 102, 108, 120
BSL Adjustment   25mm
Riser Heights   2 + flat
Vertical Release   3-11
Lateral Release   3-11
Crampon Ready   Yes
Specs Verified Yes
Design
Materials   Aluminum alloys, POM, stainless steel
Skimo Co Says
Usage Backcountry, sidecountry, general touring
Notes Great binding loaded with features
Bottom Line Wide range of release adjustments to work for all different types of skiers
Compare to other Full-featured Bindings

Related Products

Questions & Reviews

12/3/2024
Question from Samu
 
Hi! Which ski brake size should I take for a Black Crows Navis Freebird Ski with 102mm under foot: 102 or 108? I have the same question for the new Timepacer 12 and the Ova Freebird: should the 86mm ski break size be just fine? Thanks in advance!
12/3/2024
Answer from Emmett I
 
Hi Samu,

I would go with the 102mm for your Navis Freebird, and the 86mm for your Ova Freebird.
Answer this question:

11/27/2024
Question from Becky
 
Are these just as safe as the dynafit rotation 10?
11/27/2024
Answer from jbo
 
Hi Becky, the short answer to that question is "likely not". That's not to say the Raider Evo is unsafe, however, the Rotation 10 is unique amongst lateral heel-release tech bindings in that it was certified to DIN standards. This was likely achieved due to specific design elements such as a rotating toe and gapless heel, which together make the release function the most reliable for this type of binding (lateral heel-release).

If you really want to get into the weeds, you can contrast these bindings with lateral toe-release bindings which have different characteristics, explained here.
Answer this question:

10/1/2024
Question from Zachary H
 
I got these mounted at a local shop, and when they came back the gap between the boot and the tower on one side was almost perfectly 5.5mm and the other side it was somewhere between 4.0 and 5.5 but not quite close to either one. Perhaps around 4.7mm?

This seems like a glaring issue; my expectation is that ATK is precise enough in their manufacturing that there shouldn't be such a big difference between individual bindings. Is this a failing on the shop's part to set the gap correctly, or could there actually be a big enough difference between them under a torque test to warrant the gap differing by up to 1.5mm from the manufacturer's stated heel gap requirement?
10/1/2024
Answer from Emmett I
 
Hi Zachary,

Should be a 4mm gap, ATK's tolerance is 0.5mm. So 5.5mm is definitely big.
10/1/2024
Answer from jbo
 
Also note it's not standard practice to adjust the heel gap to change release values, especially with an adjustable-release binding. It's not hard to hit 4mm exactly on these.
10/1/2024
Answer from Zachary H
 
So this really does look like incompetence on the end of the tech who mounted the bindings... Very annoying.

Thanks!
Answer this question:

1/27/2024
Question from Adam
 
Do you think the toe-piece release adjustment is worth the weight penalty when compared to a lighter full featured ATK binding, such as the RT 10 Evo? I would be likely be mounting these (or the RT 10 Evo) on the Blizzard Zero G 95 used for ski mountaineering.
1/27/2024
Answer from Carlos M
 
Hi Adam,

I think the biggest benefit of the adjustable toepiece will be better retention at high speeds for aggressive skiing, although it may help ensure the accuracy of the release at lower release values as well. I think if you are an aggressive skier, the Evo Raiders will do a better job of keeping you in without having to crank the release values up.

The other difference I would draw you to between those bindings would be the ramp angle - the Raider 11 Evo is flatter at 11mm of delta, whereas the RT 10 Evo sits higher at 14.5. So if you prefer a flatter binding, the Raider 11 Evo will be a bit flatter, especially with a shim.
1/27/2024
Answer from Adam K
 
I would ski either binding at a higher release value (9/10). Is a shim available for the RT 10 Evo? At 100g heavier, it's difficult to go with the Raider Evo 11 unless the downhill performance is far superior.
Answer this question:

1/1/2024
Question from Eric
 
I’m curious if the brakes are less prone to ice up and/or more powerful than on the older (not Evo) models. I find the brakes on the previous generation ATKs frequently fail to deploy. It makes me pretty gun shy about purchasing more from ATK. Thoughts?
1/1/2024
Answer from Jeff
 
Eric, This system is easier to use and shouldn't have an icing up issue. I hadn't experienced issues with the other system not deploying. But these do seem to have more 'Snap' when releasing the brake.
1/2/2024
Answer from Eric S
 
Perhaps I need to grease the brake area.. It's been a pretty persistent problem on both my skis that have ATK on them.
Answer this question:

Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.

Model: Raider 11 Evo

Follow us on social media

View full screen version