Atomic Backland UL 78 Ski

Notice: Atomic released a new ski under the name "Atomic Backland UL 78", which you can find here.

Atomic changed the name, but not the singular purpose. The Backland UL 78 is a ski mountaineering weapon. The ski is capable of slicing and dicing on hard snow, while remaining playful in soft snow due to the lightly rockered tip. The double-carbon construction is reliable on the steeps and the ultra-light wood core helps you get it done. The Backland UL series features the same Step-Down sidewall that proved durable in the Ultimate line of mountaineering skis. The tip has been redesigned to help it cut through rough patches, but otherwise the ski remains a workhorse. The Backland UL 78 is a safe bet when you’re skiing not-so-safe lines.

15% rocker in the AT 2.0 tip makes skiing powder and mank more of a joy than a pain.
Two fiber inserts make the ski Carbon Powered which improves torsional stiffness.
Multi-wood core offers the lightness of Paulownia with the strength of Poplar.
Step-down sidewall is thicker underfoot where you might expect most impacts.

Specifications
Lengths (cm)	157, 163, 169, 175
Weight -> ounces	945g [157] 1010g [163] 1070g [169] 1130g [175]
Weight (pair)	1890g [157] 2020g [163] 2140g [169] 2260g [175]
Dimensions	111-78-101 [157] 112-78-102 [163] 113-78-103 [169] 114-78-104 [175]
Turn Radius	15m [157] 16m [163] 17m [169] 18m [175]
Skin Fix	Tip notch, flat recessed tail
Specs Verified	Yes
Profile	15% rocker, 85% camber
Shape	Round tip, steep-ish sidecut, flat tail
Construction	Step down sidewall w/ carbon laminates
Core	Karuba + Poplar
Usage	Endurance touring, ski mountaineering
Notes	New tip shape for better slicing performance
Bottom Line	Endurance touring at its best

What did Atomic change from this vintage to the 2020 ski?

Hey Tom. The full product description won't go live until August 1st, and the updated ski won't be available for purchase until this fall. However, here is the partially finished product page for the updated Atomic Backland UL 78

Answer this question:

I have used these for almost every kind of fun: trips light, long, short, quick, slow, any kind of outing over several seasons. I've also loaned them to folks who swear they are the lightest funnest skis for kicking around everything from the backyard to the resort to the skin track to real ski mountaineering objectives, especially if you keep the length short. They edge well, plow through crud well enough and can float pretty well in soft snow, as long as you are not packing weight. They are fun and bouncy edge to edge, hold on ice, and the rocker is more noticeable than other Atomic and similar size skis I've used, and in a good way. I wish I had gotten my skins with a race tip/toggle and would change that if I could motivate. I think this would be the ski I'd feel most secure on whether skinning around the woods or dropping into a tight chute. I use with tlt 5s or 6s and dynafit low tech bindings.

Comment on this review:

Trying to decide between the 2019 Atomic Backland 85 and the 2019 Atomic Backland 85 UL. Can't seem to find the find what difference is between the two. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Jared

Hey Jared! It's mostly a core difference. The UL is a decent amount lighter than the standard Backland. Not sure if it's worth anything or not, but we've skied both versions plenty of times but there's a reason we only carry the UL version ;)

Answer this question:

I have skied these about 20 days in backcountry in various conditions in 175cm (114-78-104), with Dynafit TLT6 boots. Overall, I was very happy with the skis although I found the radius to be a little short for my liking. The skis ski well through crust and on firm or wind affected snow. I didn't ski anything super steep or icy so can't comment on that but they performed well on 40-45 degrees. They seem well built and quite durable.
I would have rated these 4.5 stars but I have recently switched to Movement Big Fish X so I am comparing to those -
it is a very similar on paper (174cm and 116-78-97) but the slight differences add up for me (a bit lighter, flowing better in deeper snow). See my review on that page.

Comment on this review:

Is there a weight limit on this ski? This seems like a good "race" ski for a 200lb + tall guy if run in the 169 length? Could it handle that?

Hi Aaron, I'm pretty close to your weight and have been skiing this ski on that length for the last year. It's been fantastic! It's quite a burly, durable construction for such a light ski. Definitely can work as a race ski for a big guy, but it's completely serviceable as a mountaineering ski and mission oriented touring ski, even at your size.

Thanks Nate! In full disclosure, I am actually 150# and 5'9" but a guy I know is your size and looking for a race/light and fast ski and I thought this might be the ticket - good to know your experience has been a good one!

Answer this question:

Just checking here, but this 'step-down' sidewall - it's exactly the same as the new Salomon S/Lab X-alp right?

Hi Joseph, the Salomon X-Alp ski doesn't have a sidewall, but yes, the Atomic Backland UL does have a mini sidewall underfoot.

Answer this question: