Atomic Backland UL 78 Ski

Atomic changed the name, but not the singular purpose. The Backland UL 78 is a ski mountaineering weapon. The ski is capable of slicing and dicing on hard snow, while remaining playful in soft snow due to the lightly rockered tip. The double-carbon construction is reliable on the steeps and the ultra-light wood core helps you get it done. The Backland UL series features the same Step-Down sidewall that proved durable in the Ultimate line of mountaineering skis. The tip has been redesigned to help it cut through rough patches, but otherwise the ski remains a workhorse. The Backland UL 78 is a safe bet when you’re skiing not-so-safe lines.

• 15% rocker in the AT 2.0 tip makes skiing powder and mank more of a joy than a pain.
• Two fiber inserts make the ski Carbon Powered which improves torsional stiffness.
• Multi-wood core offers the lightness of Paulownia with the strength of Poplar.
• Step-down sidewall is thicker underfoot where you might expect most impacts.

1/11/2019

Question from Jared Nelson

 

Trying to decide between the 2019 Atomic Backland 85 and the 2019 Atomic Backland 85 UL. Can't seem to find the find what difference is between the two. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Jared

1/11/2019

Answer from Trace Leches

 

Hey Jared! It's mostly a core difference. The UL is a decent amount lighter than the standard Backland. Not sure if it's worth anything or not, but we've skied both versions plenty of times but there's a reason we only carry the UL version ;)

Answer this question:

Post Answer

2/17/2018

by Stano Skintrack (used product regularly)

 

I have skied these about 20 days in backcountry in various conditions in 175cm (114-78-104), with Dynafit TLT6 boots. Overall, I was very happy with the skis although I found the radius to be a little short for my liking. The skis ski well through crust and on firm or wind affected snow. I didn't ski anything super steep or icy so can't comment on that but they performed well on 40-45 degrees. They seem well built and quite durable.
I would have rated these 4.5 stars but I have recently switched to Movement Big Fish X so I am comparing to those -
it is a very similar on paper (174cm and 116-78-97) but the slight differences add up for me (a bit lighter, flowing better in deeper snow). See my review on that page.

Comment on this review:

Post Comment

1/22/2018

Question from Aaron O

 

Is there a weight limit on this ski? This seems like a good "race" ski for a 200lb + tall guy if run in the 169 length? Could it handle that?

1/22/2018

Answer from Nate

 

Hi Aaron, I'm pretty close to your weight and have been skiing this ski on that length for the last year. It's been fantastic! It's quite a burly, durable construction for such a light ski. Definitely can work as a race ski for a big guy, but it's completely serviceable as a mountaineering ski and mission oriented touring ski, even at your size.

1/23/2018

Answer from Aaron O

 

Thanks Nate! In full disclosure, I am actually 150# and 5'9" but a guy I know is your size and looking for a race/light and fast ski and I thought this might be the ticket - good to know your experience has been a good one!

Answer this question:

Post Answer

12/26/2017

Question from Joseph O

 

Just checking here, but this 'step-down' sidewall - it's exactly the same as the new Salomon S/Lab X-alp right?

12/26/2017

Answer from jbo

 

Hi Joseph, the Salomon X-Alp ski doesn't have a sidewall, but yes, the Atomic Backland UL does have a mini sidewall underfoot.

Answer this question:

Post Answer

Write a Review Ask a Question Post a Comment

  Submit Review

Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.