(hover to zoom, click to enlarge)

Black Diamond Helio 88 Ski

Brand: Black Diamond
Model: Helio 88
Shipping: FREE*
Availability: In Stock
Price: $829.95 From $499.96
    - or add to package
* Ski Length:
 - OR - 

As the lightest and skinniest member of the Helio family, the 88 is the fastest to the top and the quickest to turn. It’s the ideal choice for long-distance or high-altitude winter tours, plus spring mountaineering season. It shares the Sidewall Dampening System of the other Helio skis which is what makes them feel like a beefier ski. The full length ABS sidewalls improve the impact resistance and offer and secure edge hold. Those are important features when you’re high on a mountain with just one way down. The Helio 88 skis are versatile, easy-to-handle, and just plain fun.

  • Rubber integrated into the sidewall behind the heel reduces vibration on hard snow.
  • Balsa flax wood core is wrapped by carbon-fiber to make a reliable ski with a balanced flex.
  • Beveled 5mm ABS sidewalls help with edge hold and add some rock impact resistance.
  • Binding area is reinforced with Titanal sheets that will make pull-out a near impossibility.
  • Rockered tip and medium sidecut make for a good all-round ski that won’t get hung up.

Update 2018/19: Along with a graphics update the ski had its layup tweaked for a bit more dampening. Weight went up 2-3 ounces per ski.

Lengths (cm) 158, 168, 178
-> ounces
1235g [158]
1170g [158 - 17/18]
1320 [168]
1250g [168 - 17/18]
1440g [178]
1340g [178 - 17/18]
Weight (pair) 2270g [158]
2620g [168]
2880g [178]
Dimensions 119-88-110 [158]
121-88-111 [168]
123-88-112 [178]
Turn Radius 17m [158]
18m [168]
19m [178]
Skin Fix Round tip, reinforced flat-notch tail
Specs Verified Yes
Profile 240-270mm rockered tip, traditional camber w/ 129-143mm "Semi Rocker" tail
Shape Rounded tip, medium radius, flat tail
Construction Flat sandwich with pre-preg carbon layup
Core Balsa flax wood core
Skimo Co Says
Usage Long distance touring
Notes Full sidewall construction has great edge hold
Bottom Line All around mountaineering ski for high altitude adventures
Question from Josh
Trying to decide between the 88 and the 95. 6'5" 182lbs. New skier switching from splitboarding. Ultrarunner who wants to train through winter without the pounding. In the Scarpa F1 boot, leaning toward the G3 Zed unless you call me a dummy. Length and width ski you'd reco?
Answer from eric
Hey Josh I would look at the Helio 88 in 178cm if your looking for moving fast and keeping fitness. 95 would be better for everyday powder hunting.
Answer this question:

Question from meta
I am getting a BD helio 85 158cm for skimo. (I am 115lb and 5'3) What binding do you recommend? I am thinking about the dynafit speed turn because of its lightness, but I am also somewhat concerned about the degraded downhill performance?
Answer from jbo
Hi meta, it's generally best to match up a binding with a skier. As such I'd recommend visiting our binding finder to discover all your options. Downhill performance is not a problem with the Speed Turn, for what it's worth.
Answer this question:

Question from Zachary L
Hi all,

I am living in Northern New England and am about 5'11" 170 pounds. I am a splitboarder who has made a hardboot transition for my splitting, and is now looking to get back on skis for fitness before the lifts run, traverses, approaches to climbs (especially in the presidentials), and some other two plank fun. My boots are the arcteryx procline (noncarbon). yes I snowboard in them too!

I have narrowed my choices of ski down to the Voile Objective, the BD Helio 88, the Blizzard Zero G 85, and the Dynafit 7 Summits. My question is not just which ski, but how long? I will not be the most graceful skier, and most likely not maching down the mountain on these things. And also, any recommendations for which ski to go for? I have an old pair of speed radical toes that I will be using.


- the one planker.
Answer from Trace Leches
Hey Zach, thanks for reaching out! Good work snowboarding in those boots! Hard-booting is a slippery slope (did that count as a pun?). I'd go for the 168cm ski with the 178cm being a not very close second choice. The Voile Objective, Blizzard Zero G 85, and Dynafit Seven Summits are all offered in 171cm lengths, which I think suits you a bit better than the 168cm Helio 88. Just on a personal note, I think the flex pattern of the Seven Summits and Voile Objective will suit your boots a bit better than the Zero G 85 or Helio 88.
Answer from Zachary L
Thanks for the reply! much appreciated. I didn't really think about the procline limitations and which ski would work best..
Answer this question:

Question from Aaron
I am 5'6 150 and am looking for a ski most suitable for pure ski mountaineering objectives and climbing approaches. I am torn between the 88s and the 95s and on how to size them.
Answer from Trace Leches
Hey Aaron, thanks for reaching out. I'd say it may depend on which boots you are skiing in. I think the Helio 88 in a 158 could be perfect for approaches and steep skiing, though the 168cm ski would be nice if it was going to be your only ski for all conditions. The Helio 95 in 163cm would be awesome as well though.
Answer from Aaron J
I'll be skiing in Scarpa Maestrale alpine touring boots.
Answer from jbo
Hi Aaron, I'd go for the 88 in a 168 for your size and purpose. And then get lighter boots :P
Answer from Aaron J
Thank you for the responses. Yes, I intend for these to be my only par of skis.
Answer this question:

Question from Michael
The specs say that they are not recommended for telemark bindings. Does anyone know why?
Answer from jbo
Hi Michael, typically that is because there isn't enough reinforcement in the toe binding area to handle the forces applied when dropping a knee.
Answer this question:

Question from Christine
Thanks jbo. Follow up questions to the one posted below! I am debating between the Helio 88s and the 95s. I just realized they are quite different dimensions. The 88s @ 168cm are 121-88-112 and 95s @163 cm are almost the same tip and tale but wider under foot. (122-95-112). So the 95's actually have less side cut - which I think would be an advantage skinning up on ice?

I am 5'6, 150 lbs and a intermediate+ skier with many years of touring. I think the 163's might be a little short for me, so maybe that solves it and I should buy the 88s.?

Thanks for any thoughts!
Answer from jbo
Hi Christine, yes the 95s are 1 meter longer in radius. It's not a big enough difference to be noticeable when skinning.
Answer this question:

Question from Christine
I am considering the 88's for a spring tour in the alps. I currently have the BD converts but want something lighter. I also hate how insecure the converts (and any wide and shaped ski I have used in the past) feel when skiing up icy snow. Do you think the 88s will hold an edge better when skiing up? Thanks!
Answer from jbo
Yes Christine, the skinnier skis are easier to skin up, with better edging on the up and down. The Helio 88s are reliable in spring icy conditions, and they are still fun in powder too :)
Answer this question:

by dauwhe (used product a few times)
I now have four days on these, in wildly varying conditions. So far, they are exactly what I hoped for—maneuverable, turny, easy. On skied-out end-of-the-day manmade, there were no unpleasant surprises. On sticky, soggy sidecountry mush, I was somewhat surprised to be able to turn at all. On pristine pre-first-chair corduroy, they were swoopy and fun. Today, on really brutal skied-out semi-refrozen dust on crust, they were really quick across the fall line in tight spaces, and I could steer them through the ruts and piles while staying upright. I was amazed to survive that snow at all. They're light enough that I never noticed weight on the up. I'm skiing these with a Dynafit classic toe, Speed Superlite 1.0 heel, and TLT6Ms. I'm so looking forward to more skiing with these!

Comment on this review:

Question from Frederique
I'm debating between the helio 88 or 95 for my lightweight touring setup. Mostly skiing on the west coast on both steeps
and heavier powder. I don't weigh much (120lbs) so I thought I could get away with a skinnier ski that would still be able to
perform in crud and heavier west coast snow. What do you guys reckon?

Thanks in advance,

Answer from Trace Leches
Hey Frederique, I'd go with the 88, hands down. You mentioned you are trying to get a "lightweight setup"...so get a lightweight setup. The 88 will perform better on steep, icy terrain due to the lighter weight and narrower build, the light rocker will help you float on top of crud rather than get bounced around, and it's a LOT of ski for the weight/waist width so don't be afraid to let it loose every once in a while.
Answer this question:

Write a Review Ask a Question Post a Comment

Your name: (or )

Your e-mail:

Overall rating:
1 star 5 stars

Your review:

What is 1 + 7?

Your website (optional):

Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
» Compare to other Mid-fat Skis 
© 2018 Skimo Co
View Full Screen Version