Hi,
Are there two versions, the "normal" and the f-team? If so, are there relevant differences? Thanks!
Dynastar M-Tour 100 F-Team Ski
Replacing the M-Tour 99, the M-Tour 100 from Dynastar sports a revised shape that provides greater versatility across a wide array of conditions. The Hybrid Core 2.0 Light combines Poplar and PU materials to create a damp, durable, and stable ride. The progressive rocker in the tip and tail allows the ski to float in deeper snow while providing a maneuverable and intuitive feel in less-than-ideal conditions. The light-sintered HD base material aims to find the ideal balance of durability and weight while the unidirectional fiberglass laminate helps absorb chatter. With an intuitive and well-rounded personality, the Dynastar M-Tour 100 is a smart choice to bring home.
- Poplar/PU Hybrid Core 2.0 Light is svelte, damp, and stable.
- Unidirectional fiberglass laminate absorbs and dampens vibration from chattery snow conditions.
- Full sandwich sidewalls help with edge hold and durability.
- Adaptive sidecut provides an intuitive feel across a swath of conditions.
- Light-sintered HD base sheds unnecessary weight while keeping things durable.
- Progressive tip and tail rocker assists with flotation in powder while allowing the ski to remain maneuverable through tight choke points.
Update 2026/27: Same great ski, new paint job
| Specifications | |
| Length(s) cm | 162, 170, 178, 186 |
|
Weight |
1260g [162] 1335g [170] 1420g [178] 1515g [186] |
| Weight (pair) | 2520g [162] 2670g [170] 2840g [178] 3030g [186] |
|
|
132-98-122 [162] 133-99-123 [170] 134-100-124 [178] 134-100-124 [186] |
|
Turn |
15m [162] 16m [170] 17m [178] 18m [186] |
|
Skin |
Rounded tips, notched tail |
| Specs Verified | Yes |
| Design | |
|
|
Progressive tip and tail rocker, camber underfoot |
|
|
Short radius, rounded tip & tail |
|
|
Full sandwich sidewall |
|
|
Poplar/PU Hybrid Core 2.0 Light |
| Skimo Co Says | |
| Usage | Anywhere and everywhere |
| Notes | Progressive rocker helps with maneuverability |
| Bottom Line | Versatile ski for all conditions |
| Compare to other High-fat Skis | |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
5/12/2026
5/12/2026
Hi Daniel,
There is only one version of this ski. Dynastar likes long names, and you may also see "open" in the name on Dynastar's site. F-Team is short for Factory Team, signifying products developed in conjunction with Dynastar athletes.
There is only one version of this ski. Dynastar likes long names, and you may also see "open" in the name on Dynastar's site. F-Team is short for Factory Team, signifying products developed in conjunction with Dynastar athletes.
Answer this question:
1/15/2026
I am looking for a new ski and am considering this one, the Tigard 97 and the Backland 102. What are the main differences between them and where do they excel? I need a good allrounder with some floatation but that handles less than ideal conditions well.
1/15/2026
Hi, all three would work well for your use case. The Tigard has the most rocker of the bunch, so great float and easy to ski damp, heavy snow with. The M-Tour is stiff and poppy, and also has the shortest turn radius of the three. And the Backland 102 is a good option if you want something with a longer radius, but not quite as rockered (better firm snow performance) as the Tigard.
Answer this question:
12/8/2025
Hi everyone. How does the ski perform in hard, uneven conditions? Does the ski tip chatter on the slope?
12/8/2025
Michael- This ski does reasonably well on hard, uneven snow. The tip has a bunch of rocker that will vibrate like any other ski with large tip rocker thats off the snow. The vibration does not travel down to the ski to your boot though, it generally stops near the contact point.
Answer this question:
10/9/2025
Hello,
I'm really interested by the Dynastar M tour 100 but I'm hesitating for one thing and I would like to have your advice please if possible. I have a carbon Mytic 99 and a M tour 89 which I like very, very much and I hope to get the same feeling with the M tour 100. My Mytic getting old I bought a LINE Vision 98 to replace it but even it is as easy to ski than the Mytic and my M tour 89 I don't like it because the feeling from the tail that seems less directionnal, too soft. According to the description of the M tour 100 should I be afraid to have the same feeling from the tail than the Line Vision? I hope you will be able to answer me. Thank you very much.
I'm really interested by the Dynastar M tour 100 but I'm hesitating for one thing and I would like to have your advice please if possible. I have a carbon Mytic 99 and a M tour 89 which I like very, very much and I hope to get the same feeling with the M tour 100. My Mytic getting old I bought a LINE Vision 98 to replace it but even it is as easy to ski than the Mytic and my M tour 89 I don't like it because the feeling from the tail that seems less directionnal, too soft. According to the description of the M tour 100 should I be afraid to have the same feeling from the tail than the Line Vision? I hope you will be able to answer me. Thank you very much.
10/9/2025
Hi Alain, these do have a more rockered, less directional tail than the older M-Tour 90 and 99, and a bit more progressive mount point - similar to the Vision, but less exaggerated. The Kastle TX99 could be worth a look if you want something with a flat, traditional tail.
Answer this question:
Skied them twice and the sidewall blew out, Dynastar didn't warranty them. Plenty of other brands to give your money to.
Before they blew out the skis felt pretty floppy which limited their hard snow performance and confidence, but the shape was prone to diving in powder. Not an ideal combo.
Before they blew out the skis felt pretty floppy which limited their hard snow performance and confidence, but the shape was prone to diving in powder. Not an ideal combo.
Comment on this review:
(178cm) Iwas helping my dad (74 yrs) to get some skis to help him ski powder better. He is just about as good technically as he's ever been, with less endurance of course because of his age. He is a strong intermediate skier. It actually worked. He is MUCH better in powder than he had been. These are longer than his other skis which he really liked. But in powder and in everything else he's a little better. They really hold on ice. Plow right through fast/ sticky spring snow. They are pretty easy to manage at all times. I've skied them too of course. Jeff helped us so much. Between the three of us there was A LOT of back and forth but in the end it worked out to make a senior skier the best he's ever been. Thank you all. Thanks Jeff
Comment on this review:
9/14/2025
How does this ski compare to the DPS Carbon Pagoda Tour CFL 100 ?
9/15/2025
Adam, They are both really fun powder skis.
Both float really well for the 100m width, and turn quick and easy. And about equal in weight.
Just one thing that is different, you can buy two of these for the price of one DPS.
Both float really well for the 100m width, and turn quick and easy. And about equal in weight.
Just one thing that is different, you can buy two of these for the price of one DPS.
9/15/2025
Thanks Jeff. Any feedback on how the skis differ in variable and firmer conditions?
9/16/2025
That’s tough. The Dynastars do well on firm conditions. But the DPS Pagoda’s are really damp and can handle difficult conditions better then any ski at this weight.
PS, I have Pagoda 100.
PS, I have Pagoda 100.
Answer this question:
8/16/2025
Hello skimo team.
What's the recommended mount point in this ski?
Would you recommended a -2 cm or so?
Cheers
Daniel
What's the recommended mount point in this ski?
Would you recommended a -2 cm or so?
Cheers
Daniel
8/18/2025
Hi Daniel, we measured a 178cm at 8.8 from true center. You could go 2 back for sure if you prefer a traditional mount point, but any more and I would look for a ski with a more traditional recommended mount point.
Answer this question:
5/2/2025
Hi, Skimo.
Will the 162 cm length be back in stock in the future?
Thanks
Zesheng
Will the 162 cm length be back in stock in the future?
Thanks
Zesheng
5/2/2025
Hi Zesheng, as of now we'll be receiving more this fall, but nothing before then. If you'd like, shoot us an email at help@skimo.co and we can add you to a notification list.
Answer this question:
3/23/2025
Hi, i have a Camox freebird and will like something slightly wider, to get better flotation in fresh snow than my Camox, how will perform the dynastar in variable snows and firm/icy Vs the Camox?
And to use time to time on piste between powder days will be worse than Camox?
The other ski i consider was faction Machine 2
Thanks a lot
And to use time to time on piste between powder days will be worse than Camox?
The other ski i consider was faction Machine 2
Thanks a lot
3/24/2025
Hi Gabriel!
The Camox will remain the better performer in such conditions, however the M-Tour 100 would certainly be an improvement in soft snow. It is a very versatile ski, and will still perform well in both variable and firm snow. If that is a priority for the next pair of skis, this could be a great option for you! The Factions, due to long rocker lines and little camber, struggle in firm snow. They do make for a playful soft snow ski however. Thanks!
The Camox will remain the better performer in such conditions, however the M-Tour 100 would certainly be an improvement in soft snow. It is a very versatile ski, and will still perform well in both variable and firm snow. If that is a priority for the next pair of skis, this could be a great option for you! The Factions, due to long rocker lines and little camber, struggle in firm snow. They do make for a playful soft snow ski however. Thanks!
Answer this question:
3/22/2025
Curious how you would compare this ski with the Salomon MTN 96 Carbon?
3/24/2025
Hi Jeremy,
The M-Tour is stiffer, especially in the tail. It's also a bit more progressive. The MTN 96 will be more forgiving, and the mount point is a bit further back.
The M-Tour is stiffer, especially in the tail. It's also a bit more progressive. The MTN 96 will be more forgiving, and the mount point is a bit further back.
Answer this question:
2/6/2025
Hi, could someone measure the recommended mount point on these skis (from center)?
2/6/2025
Hi David, what length were you looking for? I can measure one for sure.
The older 99 was, averaged between the sizes, 12cm back from center.
The older 99 was, averaged between the sizes, 12cm back from center.
2/6/2025
I'm looking at the 178s
2/6/2025
We don't have a 178 in stock to measure, but the 170 and 186 measured 8.1cm and 8.9cm back, respectively.
Answer this question:
1/23/2025
Any more color after getting these on snow on how they compare to the old M Tour 99? Love that ski but need a new pair so have been eying these but it's not clear to me what they changed.
1/24/2025
Hi Jack,
There are some notable changes - the new 100 gets a bit more tail rocker, a slightly rounder flex, and wider tips and tails for a shorter turning radius. All this adds up to a ski that's turnier than the previous model, and a little more drifty.
There are some notable changes - the new 100 gets a bit more tail rocker, a slightly rounder flex, and wider tips and tails for a shorter turning radius. All this adds up to a ski that's turnier than the previous model, and a little more drifty.
Answer this question:
11/14/2024
Hello from across the pond - hope you don't mind throwing out a question or two here since yous are by far the best source of information for any discerning ski-mountaineer :)
I'm looking for something around the 100mm mark as an all-round adventure ski, plenty of steep skiing as well the occaisonal powder day, all human-powered. I'm currently considering both the Black Crows Navis and the Dynastar MTour 100. Any key differences between the two that yous would care to highlight besides the basic stats? And any other models that would fit the brief that yous can recommend?
Cheers
I'm looking for something around the 100mm mark as an all-round adventure ski, plenty of steep skiing as well the occaisonal powder day, all human-powered. I'm currently considering both the Black Crows Navis and the Dynastar MTour 100. Any key differences between the two that yous would care to highlight besides the basic stats? And any other models that would fit the brief that yous can recommend?
Cheers
11/14/2024
Hi Orlando,
The primary differences between the Black Crows Navis FB and the Dynastar M-Tour 100 are going to be the weight and the rocker profile. The Navis is considerably heavier, and as such, will be a damper and more planted ski on the downhill. It is moderately stiff, and does not have very much rocker - just a little in the tip. The Dynastar has more rocker in the tip and tail than the Navis, and being lighter, will be a more efficient ski on big days. I think it will also be easier to turn in a variety of conditions, due to the rocker profile and the shorter turn radius.
For a mountaineering/adventure ski with a lot of steep skiing, two other skis I would highly consider are the Blizzard Zero G 95 and the Atomic Backland 95. Both are competitively light, and fairly stiff. The Zero G 95 is the classic steep ski, with tons of edge control and a nice straighter profile for landing jump turns. The current iteration is also quite fun and has some good energy to it. The Backland 95 is a little more rockered would do a little better in powder, but would still make a solid ski in the steeps!
The primary differences between the Black Crows Navis FB and the Dynastar M-Tour 100 are going to be the weight and the rocker profile. The Navis is considerably heavier, and as such, will be a damper and more planted ski on the downhill. It is moderately stiff, and does not have very much rocker - just a little in the tip. The Dynastar has more rocker in the tip and tail than the Navis, and being lighter, will be a more efficient ski on big days. I think it will also be easier to turn in a variety of conditions, due to the rocker profile and the shorter turn radius.
For a mountaineering/adventure ski with a lot of steep skiing, two other skis I would highly consider are the Blizzard Zero G 95 and the Atomic Backland 95. Both are competitively light, and fairly stiff. The Zero G 95 is the classic steep ski, with tons of edge control and a nice straighter profile for landing jump turns. The current iteration is also quite fun and has some good energy to it. The Backland 95 is a little more rockered would do a little better in powder, but would still make a solid ski in the steeps!
11/16/2024
Cheers for rundown. I'm actually looking for a replacement for my Zero G 95s, they've been great but I'm trending towards something a bit damper, softer and with a shorter radius. I'm 178cm but then could potentially go for 173 in the Navis to shave a bit of weight and have an easier-turning ski in steep/narrow terrain since with a shorter rocker I would guess the effective edge would be similar to the MTour in 178?
6/2/2025
Orlando I'm curious what you decided to go with? I'm debating between the same 2 skis: Navis FB and the M-Tour 100s. I was convinced I wanted the Navis but then looking at the weight difference I'm having second thoughts. I want a ski that's confident on the steeps in all conditions.. I'm a PNW skier that tours in plenty of crud conditions..
2/28/2026
Hi Richard, apologies for only replying now - haven't been in for yonks.
I ended up going with the Dynastars (got a chance to try the navise as well) and haven't looked back! I use it just as much on mellow powder days as steep and committing terrain. Mounted it with an ATK Trofeo so still light enough for big days out!
I ended up going with the Dynastars (got a chance to try the navise as well) and haven't looked back! I use it just as much on mellow powder days as steep and committing terrain. Mounted it with an ATK Trofeo so still light enough for big days out!
Answer this question:
11/1/2024
As a longtime Dynastar Mythic fan, would you say this ski is a continuation of the Dynastar Mythic 97 and M-Tour 99 line? How does the ski flex compared to its predecessors?
11/1/2024
Eric, yes it is a continuation of some great skis. I haven't tested this one out yet. The first two were very similar. This one has a similar flex, what stands out is the wider tip. The old floated like a wider ski, now this one is wider. Should be awesome.
11/1/2024
Hi Eric, the Mythic was almost two skis in one...carvy underfoot but a big rockered shovel made it a powder ski as well. The 99, and now the slightly evolved 100, have a more "integrated" shape in terms of the sidecut blending into the rocker, which is not as exaggerated. I'd say they are all similar in flex and the newer ones being a bit more damp with the PU.
Answer this question:
10/10/2024
Hi there! Could someone perhaps share the where recommended mount point is on these (either distance from tail, or from center)? Thanks!
10/11/2024
Justin, These skis haven't come in yet, so I can't measure. Looking at the M Tour 108, the recommended mounting point is a couple cm back of similar skis.
1/29/2025
bumping this question -- could someone please measure the position of the mount point from center? [easiest way -- just stand the skis up tip-to-tail, measure distance between the mount lines, & divide by 2 :) ]
Answer this question:
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
