Dynastar M-Vertical 88 F-Team Ski
Some days, snow conditions are all over the place with no way of knowing what you'll find. The slightest change in aspect, elevation, or weather can cause you to end up nervously staring down an icy couloir with girthy powder skis. Or perhaps a neck-deep powder run with the skinniest of skis. Neither is ideal. Rest assured that won’t happen to you on the Dynastar M-Vertical 88s. These capable sticks gleefully charge through all conditions, despite barely registering on a scale. In fact, we applaud the folks at Dynastar for somehow creating an even damper and quieter version of its predecessor, the Dynastar Vertical F-Team. A lightweight hybrid paulownia/polyurethane core softens cruddy chop while a full sidewall maximizes edge hold. That way you can descend with confidence, no matter what the snow Gods have bestowed upon your line. It could be said that the Dynastar M-Vertical 88 is the do-it-all quiver killer for aggressive skiers.
- Hybrid Paulownia / Polyurethane core is a light-n-damp platform to handle crud and speed.
- Core wrapped with Basalt fiber for torsional rigidity and durability.
- Moderate rocker balances contact length and ease of turning and surfing for a smooth ride through a variety of conditions.
- Full sidewall maximizes edge hold when you want it most.
- Notched tip allows for a race-style bungee skin system that leads to faster transitions.
- Laser sintered bases are fast and can take some abuse should you find a few "sharks" out there.
Update 2022/23: This ski now goes by the name "M-Vertical 88 F-Team" and sports some new topsheet graphics.
Specifications | |
Lengths (cm) | 156, 164, 172, 180 |
Weight |
1035g [156] 1070g [164] 1135g [172] 1205g [180] |
Weight (pair) | 2070g [156] 2140g [164] 2270g [172] 2410g [180] |
|
120-88-110 |
Turn |
16m [156] 18m [164] 20m [172] 22m [180] |
Skin |
Tip notch, reverse curved tails |
Specs Verified | Yes |
Design | |
|
Moderate rocker, camber underfoot |
|
Medium radius integrated with the rocker |
|
Sandwich with fiber torsion box |
|
Paulownia / PU |
Skimo Co Says | |
Usage | Long distance touring, mountaineering |
Notes | Basalt fibers are 25% lighter than glass |
Bottom Line | Vivian approved |
Compare to other Mid-fat Skis |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
I like to know the difference between this vertical 88 f-team and vertical 88 ( the version white and green for better understanding)
Thanks
We aren't very familiar with that one as it's not sold in the US, but from what we can tell, the green topsheet M-Vertical 88 Open is a budget construction version of the F-team ski that we carry. Not sure exactly what the differences are. But they would be the same exact shape.
Yeah Dynastar didn't bring too many of the 180cm into the US this season so they're a bit hard to come by.
Thanks a lot !
These are some of the best skis out there for steep skiing, and I would happily take them out into firm and challenging conditions with full confidence in the edge-hold. While we have found the Rise Above 88 to have a good edge to it, it does have a tighter radius underfoot due to their 3D radius technology, which is part of what makes it such a versatile and fun ski. But in general, straighter skis (less sidecut) do tend to have more predictable edge hold on steep, icy slopes.
The M-Vertical is not a difficult ski, but I do think the Volkl would be turnier with its bigger shovel and shorter underfoot radius. No difference in the tuning requirements!
Would you therefore recommend to change?
Best wishes!
I am choosing between K2 Wayback 88 and these skis. Which one is better overall but still hold great in icy conditions? Also, which one of them requires a better skier - which is better for intermediete skiers but still enjoying some steep and narrow couloirs?
thanks
I would like to ask how does these ski compare to Dynastar Mtour 90 or K2 wayback 88. I am looking for a forgiving ski for an intermidiate skier with with a great edge grip in firm conditions. Thanks
Based on your description, the M-Verticals would be a great choice for you. They are lighter and a bit stiffer than the Ubac, they would be a better ski for a confidence-inspiring, stiff mountaineering ski with great edge hold in steep terrain. The use you are describing is pretty much their niche, and they do it well.
You're right, they are. And they are for a reason.
These skis are the bees knees. The hop turn action with these is like dreaming, and all you can do is smile. They are lightweight for the up and cause no fret on that front. Powder? boot top pow is no reason to be sad, these skis rip. They are not your high speed pow crusher, but they are poppy and enjoyable when things get deep.
I am about 190cm and use the 172, the added nimbleness is very nice when things get tight.
Allez!
I realize that they're about 150 g lighter at any given length, but I'm curious how much damping Dynastar gives up with that Basalt torsion-box construction vs Salomon's laminate?
The M-Vertical 88 F-Team and K2 Wayback 88 have fairly similar characteristics.
The M-Vertical 88 F-Team is a pretty stiff ski with a longer sidecut. It is a surprisingly damp ski, and that requires some input from the skier.
The K2 Wayback 88 will be the friendlier at a slightly heavier weight. That being said, it still has a medium turn radius, and is quite versatile. Both will be good options come spring. Your decision more depends on what you want in a ski!
The M-Vertical 88 has a longer sidecut, and punches through variable conditions quite well! It has a lot of the same characteristics as the Vertical eagle, with improved dampness. This ski would lend itself well to a more aggressive skier!
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.