SCARPA F1 GT Boot
If we had to compare the F1 GT to its LT sibling, we’d have to say they are “similar but different.” Being composed of Grilamid instead of the mystical Carbon/Grilamid mixture of the LT, the GT carries a few more grams, however, it also sports a more progressive flex, which many skiers will appreciate. Specific to the GT, SCARPA added an instep buckle instead of a BOA, which adds durability while also allowing the foot to be securely locked down to help you fully enjoy the descent. For the ascent, the GT has a 72° range of motion and Vibram UFO LT sole that will have you flying up the skin track at speeds most often seen in Area 51. Built for big days in the mountains, the F1 GT will happily accompany you wherever the skin track leads.
- Tour L T2 Liner is made by Intuition and highly moldable, allowing for a truly customized fit.
- 72° range of motion will make short work of the ascent.
- Recco insert can help rescuers find you in unfortunate circumstances.
- Forward lean of 9°, 11°, or 13° (+/- 2) allows you adjust the forward lean to your preference.
- Vibram UFO LT outsole provides out-of-this-world traction.
- More progressive flex than the F1 LT due to the full Grilamid lower.
- Two buckles and a power strap provide excellent power transmission.
- Shell can be punched, helping to further customize the fit if needed.
- Taking off the included power strap can save 46 grams.
Specifications | |
Weight |
1124g [27] 1223g [28] |
Weight (pair) | 2248g [27] 2446g [28] |
|
2 |
Boot Sole |
270mm [24] 278mm [25] 286mm [26] 294mm [27] 302mm [28] 310mm [29] 319mm [30] 327mm [31] |
Binding |
Tech Only |
Cuff |
72° |
Forward |
9°, 11°, 13° (+/- 2°) |
Specs Verified | Yes |
Design | |
|
Grilamid FG LFT cuff and shell |
|
Intuition Tour L T2 |
|
Vibram UFO LT |
Skimo Co Says | |
Usage | Fast and light touring |
Notes | The instep buckle helps to secure the foot inside of the boot |
Bottom Line | A more forgiving version of the F1 LT |
Compare to other Touring Boots |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
Fit: My feet are US 13.5 and I always wear size 28 in my alpine boots and size 29 or 30 in touring boots. I went with size 31 because of (1) the BSL and desire to make my bindings work with this and a heavier boot, (2) reviews that I'd read stating that the LT/GT/XT "run short", (3) desire for a slightly roomy fit in a boot that will see lots of vert, and (4) the information on scarpa sizing from https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/showthread.php/354918-The-Definitive-Scarpa-Boot-Sizing-Guide
I am happy with the size choice. Right out of the box with a superfoot green insole, the fit was great on my medium width feet with a dominant big toe and flat arches. As the liner has packed out, I've found that I need to increase the buckle setting on my insteps, and I've added spacer board underneath the liner to take up vertical room. I think once the liner is shot I will get a slightly higher volume liner as a replacement for a bit tighter fit. The only issue I've had are minor heel blisters which I think is due to the foam still molding around my heel cup and likely a bit of movement from the fit.
I did need to increase the forward lean to the max setting to get them to feel better. They still feel somewhat upright even on my high-ramp Dynafit bindings, but that's ok. I've used these with both Wayback 96 x 177 and Voile Hypercharger 108 x 185 skis. The Chargers skied ok in good snow (pictured), but I wouldn't want to ski this combination in difficult snow.
Overall, a great boot in the lightweight class that can still ski pretty well.
I'm a fairly new skier and never having a perfectly fitting boot, I was concerned about not being able to punch the LT's in case of a tight toe. I was also intimidated by the flex pattern on the LT's.
The fit was nearly perfect. I use them with Voile Objectives and Ultravectors. They drive the Objectives perfectly and have enough power for my timid approach in variable heavy Eastern Sierra snow.
I removed the power straps for easier transitions and because they tended to ride up above the cuff onto my leg when skinning.
I prefer the traditional upper buckle over a velcro strap found on the LT's for easier transitions, and I'll probably try the XT's next time.
The F1 GT and XT have the same gaiter and lower shell material, so there shouldn't really be any difference between them. The differences between the two models are in the upper cuff, where the XT uses a stiffer carbon-infused grilamid and a different powerstrap. I think the long-term durability of the gaiter and lower shell will depend a lot on what use you are putting the boot through and much scree/rock/dirt use the boots see.
The only difference of note is that the XT incorporates long carbon fiber strands into the same cuff material as the GT in order to improve and increase both stiffness and long-term rigidity. Therefor the XT is stiffer in its flex while the GT offers a more progressive profile.
Thanks!
Do note that the F1 GT is a skinnier and lower volume boot than the standard F1. Please feel free to reach out to help@skimo.co or fill out our Boot Fitter if you'd like to discuss fit details!
Thanks!
Thanks for writing in! The F1 GT would not work with the shift binding due to minimally designed toe and heel welts. "Tech only" largely refers to the traditional touring bindings where pins insert into both the heel and toe of the boots.
Yes, the cable is replaceable by removing 2 bolts with a T20 Torx screwdriver. You are also spot on that the cable guide is riveted in place so no easy way to thread the cable through, or under it. No hidden secrets from our side on how to remedy a snapped cable other than involving replacing a rivet. If I come up with a better answer I can update this thread. Sorry for not being more helpful!
Generally, if you already have leashes, whatever you can make work. If you can reach the lower buckle, that would work well. If not, you can attach a thin piece of cord or zip tie to the lower cable and use that as your attachment point. Thanks!
Quick answer: No, but you can punch the F1 GT much more.
The F1 GT uses the same mold and cuff as the F1 LT, but it uses glass-infused Grilamid, while the F1 LT uses carbon-infused Grilamid. The glass-infused Grilamid can be punched much further than the cracking-prone carbon-infused version.
Seems like the softer plastic will keep the hinges flexing for longer but I have had a ton of buckles break down before their time.
Huge bummer because they fit my feet perfectly and ski great... this boot looks like a great replacement just not sure I want to risk another $800 with them.
I have the F1 LT and wish they could be a tad stiffer for the down and I really dislike the boa.
The GT looks great!
Thanks:)
Start with the important part, Fit. The Skorpius has a low volume fit with a med/wide toe box. Nice for some folks. The new version will have that same fit but with more instep height. The F1 LT/ GT is a low to medium fit with a tapered toe box. As mentioned below, the GT should better accept a punch, but not too much.
Performance. For the light Touring boots, they are both at the top of the list for DH performance. The Skorpius still includes a tongue, so that should give them an edge. But the new heavier GT will be very close, possibly a wash.
Considering the difference in plastics between this and the LT... Do you anticipate the GT being a bit easier to punch?
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.