We're open!  But bootfitting by appointment due to COVID.

Atomic Backland 100 Ski


In Stock

Free shipping

Long noted for manufacturing durable skis with reliable performance, Atomic has stepped up its powder-touring offerings with the new Backland 100. With a touch more rocker than its little brother the Backland 95, but plenty of camber for long days on the skin track, the Backland 100 brings a refined take on the rocker-camber-rocker profile. Up front, Atomic's unique HRZN Tech tips make entering turns a breeze with their upturned sides, while the rounded tail makes for easy turn release even in the densest of spring snow. Compared with the 95, Atomic has opted for a rounder flex with the Backland 100, making short-radius turns a breeze without losing the top-end speed that has long made the Backland series a favorite of fast descenders on both sides of the Atlantic. Pressed into service on hard snow, the Backland's heritage in the Alps quickly comes to the fore, and the skis don't balk at hard edging and inconsistent crust. With many ski tourers across western North America looking for a versatile board in the 100-underfoot category, the Backland 100 is sure to show its talents all the way from Arizona to Alberta.

  • HRZN Tech tip shaping increases flotation in deep snow, and decreases deflection in less-than-ideal conditions.
  • Carbon backbone provides the right amount of stiffness for a responsive but supple ride.
  • Atomic's Powder Rocker profile yields easy turns in powder and crud alike.
  • Full sidewall construction increases durability and creates solid edge hold.
Lengths (cm) 164, 172, 180, 188
convert to ounces
1165g [164]
1230g [172]
1325g [180]
1430g [188]
Weight (pair) 2330g [164]
2460g [172]
2650g [180]
2860g [188]
Dimensions 127.5-98-118 [164]
128.5-99-119 [172]
129.5-100-120 [180]
130.5-101-121 [188]
Turn Radius 14.6m [164]
17.0m [172]
19.2m [180]
21.6m [188]
Skin Fix Semi-round tip and tail
Specs Verified Yes
Profile Rockered tip and tail (20%/10%), light camber underfoot (70%)
Shape HRZN Tech tip, medium radius, roundish tail
Construction HRZN Tech, Carbon Backbone with Ultra Power woodcore
Core Carbon fiber and Karuba wood
Skimo Co Says
Usage Ski touring in soft snow and mixed conditions
Notes HRZN Tech spoon on a rockered tip is a powder slayers dream
Bottom Line Above average performance in all categories.
Compare to other High-fat Skis

Related Products

Questions & Reviews

stormy (used product a few times)
I'm skiing the 188's with Atomic Backland Tour's w/ brakes. I'm 6'1" 200 lbs. I don't have a ton of time on them, but I've skied them in enough different conditions to give an initial review. Mine are around 1800g per ski w/ bindings and brakes (one slightly over, one slightly under). These skis are a revelation for me. I usually have a hard time liking the way light skis perform on the down. Granted, I'm pretty big and a physical skier. I just couldn't believe what these skis were doing for me, at the weight they are. I skied some real firm sastrugi today and was able to just tear it up on these skis. Weirdly stable, for the weight. Had them on some rain crust, they edged like a champ, very strong torsionally. Skied a foot of cold pow on them, and they surfed/floated great, and loved taking speed on the run outs. So I was thinking, "what's up with these light skis, why are they so good?" Determined to find their limit, I took them to the resort. I was skiing up to 40mph on the groomers, and the Atomics were rock solid. Even fun. Determined to whip them, I found some heavy, tracked up, sun warmed after lunch mank, and then I found their limit. But to be fair, they performed pretty well for their intended use. I should mention, I ski in Scarpa Maestrale RS's, which are out for the recall repair, so I've been in my old Salomon QST 130 pro's. They aren't the stiffest touring boot, so I don't feel like they are skewing my results.
On the uphill, they are just great. For my weight and skiing, I don't need to go any lighter. I was really tentative to go this light, but this setup totally out skis my last rig, and is 400gr lighter per ski. BTW, the Atomic Backland Tour bindings have exceeded my expectations as well. I'm usually a leash guy, but these bindings are changing my mind. The brakes provide some noticeable support under the rear pins, and stiffen up the boot/ski connection. I love turning the heel pins 90 degrees on the up, and having the brake plate under my heels on the flat approaches. I haven't had a single issue with releasing, or any other function with the bindings.
Bottom line, at 1450gr, these skis still have some muscle. From my experience, if you are a bigger, pretty aggressive BC skier, and you have a hard time liking the way really light gear skis, you should give these a serious look.
Comment on this review:

Question from Seth Fineman
How is it possible that the atomic Backland 100s in the 172 length are lighter Per ski than than the Backland 95s are in a 169?
Answer from Julieana
Hey Seth, there are some differences in the core and sidewall construction between the two, as well as a different topsheet material.
Answer this question:

Comment from Joel
FYI, I purchased these in the 188 size and weighed them. 1355 for one and 1375 for the other. Very happy with those weights for 100 underfoot. Can't wait to ski them.
Reply to this comment

Question from Hayden
Has anyone tried this ski with a lighter boot? Specifically, I am curious if my Alien RS's would be sufficient to steer this ski in sub-optimal snow conditions. I currently ski a 178cm Blizzard Zero G 95 with this boot and have no issues turning in cruddy snow. I'd be looking at the 180cm version of the Backland 100.
Answer from Teddy Young
The Backland 100 might even be a touch friendlier than the Zero G 95, so I think the Alien RS should do just fine driving it!
Answer this question:

Question from Dan
Hey guys, those dimensions look very much like the Bentchetler 100 - is the rocker profile the same, or is it more directional like the other Backland skis?
Answer from TSB
Hey Dan, you got it, the Backland 100 is much more "directional" than the Bentchetlers, with a lightly rockered tail instead of the full banana-split profile of the Bentchetler 100. I think you would find it to have a much more traditional feel at the same waist width -- better for those varied backcountry conditions and the occasional encounter with some hard snow, instead of a pure powder-surfing design. In testing the Backland 100 seemed to share the damp feel of many of Atomic's skis but with a little more "oomph" for the weight than most of their previous powder offerings. Only downside is the lack of a tree-guitar (guitar-tree?) on the top sheet. :-)
Answer this question:

Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.

Model: Backland 100

Follow us on social media

View full screen version