(hover to zoom, click to enlarge)

Atomic Backland Carbon Boot

Brand: Atomic
Model: Backland Carbon
Shipping: FREE*
Availability: In Stock & Ships Today
Price: $749.00
    - or add to package
* Boot Size:
  Size Chart
Qty:  
 - OR - 

Atomic pulled out all the stops for the new Backland series of touring boots. This figurative expression not only refers to pipe-organ knobs, but also to financial constraints, production impediments, and reasons that may stop you from buying them. This includes the most common reason for not-buying a ski boot: poor fit. With a unique heat-moldable shell, the Backland Carbon boots may fit just about everyone.

Here are the main points that might stop you from not-buying:

  • Carbon reinforced Grilamid shell transfers power throughout the flex.
  • Free/Lock 2.0 is a simple transition lever that doesn’t interfere with crampons.
  • Platinum Liner is breathable which helps to prevent blisters. Also washable.
  • Memory Fit heating process allows you to adapt the shell to your foot.
  • Quick Click tongue lets you walk freely and then add stiffness for the down.
  • Carbon spine and removable power strap further increase the performance.
  • Skywalk rubber sole is grippy and appears to be reasonably durable.
  • Cross laces and support zones in the liner brace your calf, ankle, and shin.

Update for 2017/18: Atomic updated the color scheme and added a handy pull tab on the ski/walk lever.

Specifications
Weight
-> ounces
1155g [27/27.5]
Weight (pair) 2310g [27/27.5]
Buckles 2
Boot Sole Length 268mm [24/24.5]
278mm [25/25.5]
288mm [26/26.5]
298mm [27/27.5]
308mm [28/28.5]
318mm [29/29.5]
328mm [30/30.5]
Binding Compatibility Tech only
Cuff Rotation 74°
Forward Lean(s) 13°, 15°
Specs Verified Yes
Design
Materials Carbon-reinforce Grilamid
Liner Platinum
Sole Skywalk
Skimo Co Says
Usage Lightweight touring
Notes Breatheable liner
Bottom Line Complete package
10/10/2018
Question from Chris
 
I am thinking about up-sizing to a 29 from a 28.5. Do you think I could swap the cuffs between the two shells if need be, or are they size specific?

Thanks!
10/10/2018
Answer from Nate
 
Hi Chris, that's an interesting question. You might be able to do it, but we don't have any data on where the sizing changes to confirm for sure.
Answer this question:

4/27/2018
by jenda (used product regularly)
 
Bought them because on paper they were exactly what i was looking for. But....
I never could find a way how to ski in them. They are plenty stiff with the tongue, the support is not there though.
Might be because they are VERY low(and i have smaller feet for my height), but plenty time had a feeling like i could just fall out of the boot or even break my ankle(?!?).
Tried insert bigger tongues, change lean angle, different liners....nope
Buckle screws keep loosening...
OTOH pull out the tongue and the skinning is incredible, very close to a race shoe.
Atomic seem to make the shoe without significant changes years in a row now, so might be just be mine issue.
4/28/2018
Reply from jbo
 
Hi jenda, it sounds like these were a poor fit for you; the instep is a bit on the high side which is likely not good for your foot.
Comment on this review:

3/17/2018
Question from Cody
 
Hey guys I just picked up a pair of these for a future “light” ski tour set up. My current skis are mounted with kingpin’s . I have read a lot of back and fourth about the compatibility. I do not plan on skiing them with kingpins in the future but until then I wanted to try them out a couple days and all I have are the kingpins. If somebody can clear up the compatibility issue for me that would be great.

Thank you
3/17/2018
Answer from Nate
 
Hi Cody, the Backland Carbon is not Kingpin compatible out of the box. You would have to add a Kingpin heel adapter to make it work.
Answer this question:

2/14/2018
by Chris (used product regularly)
 
After 8 seasons in the Dynafit TLT5 and 6s, I was ready for something comparable in performance but that didn't develop so much slop and play in the cuff rivets and walk mode. I didn't like the direction Dynafit took with the TLT7, so this season I gave the Backland Carbon boots a try. So far I am really pleased.

The stock liner left my low volume foot swimming a bit, so I used the Intuition Pro Tours I had been using in my TLT6s. I molded the shell at home in my convection oven...I didn't get too aggressive with it as I was a bit nervous about DYI but successfully alleviated some of the mild pressure points I had prior to molding.

The cuff pivots and walk mode lock are the most solid I've seen in a boot of this genre. Time will tell, but after ~20 days they are still super solid in ski mode and from what I understand the serviceable cuff bushings are quite durable. They tour better than the TLT6 since there is no plastic tongue of any sort to restrict forward motion, but you do need to use the removable tongue for acceptable downhill performance. It's a bit trickier to insert than on the TLT6, but I found grinding the tab down made it more friendly. Some might find all the buckles and removable tongue fiddly compared to some one-lever style boots out there, but for me an extra 30 seconds during transitions is well worth the added performance. In downhill mode with tongue inserted, the boot skis at least as well as the TLT6 - a level of stiffness more than adequate for my 190 pounds and driving bigger skis in variable snow.
Comment on this review:

11/21/2017
Question from Mark
 
Do you climb in this boot with the tongues in, or do they have to be removed?
11/21/2017
Answer from Trace Leches
 
Hey Mark, it kind of depends. Most people remove the tongues to tour with but pop them back in on the way down. I have heard of people touring with the tongues in, but it definitely doesn't work out quite as well. If you want to tour with a tongue, the soft tongue has had a lot more success there.
Answer this question:

11/20/2017
Question from Tom N
 
Realistically, how wide of a ski can these boots ski well with? If someone is going to be looking for a solid uphill performer that skis a lot of powder and soft snow are these a solid choice? If these aren’t a good choice for a ski in the 95-100mm range, what other boot options that have a wider forefoot would be worth considering?
Thanks
11/20/2017
Answer from Trace Leches
 
Hey Tom, thanks for reaching out! I think this is would be a great choice for an all purpose touring boot! The forefoot in the Backland isn't necessarily super wide to begin with, however it can be punched out/molded to be by far one of the widest boots on the market. The Dynafit TLT7 is definitely another option that's pretty wide to begin with and has some similar uphill/downhill characteristics that the Backland embodies.
Answer this question:

11/7/2017
by JvR (used product a few times)
 
Like the boots after a few (long) days. I do want to switch the liner to something taller and a bit beefier though, Intuition Wrap or Protour. Would like a bit more support fore/aft (added boosters already), and got cold feet on windy days (thin socks). Never had this issue on my previous Scarpa Maestrale RS.

No shop around to test for size, so hoping someone here could help. What size Intuition liner should I get?
I have 27-27.5 backlands.
11/10/2017
Reply from eric
 
Hey Jvr, The pro tour liner will beef up the boot and not affect the walk as much as a wrap liner. We measured the liners and the 26 liner will be a match for your 27.0 shell. The Medium Volume will add some thickness to whole boot, thusa taking up more room. The Low Volume will be a more similar volume to your stock liner.
1/18/2018
Reply from Piotr T
 
I have a similar issue here; size 25 - 25.5 backlands, would like to take up some volume. I'm concerned about a size 24 liner, since I've never skied something that small before and my foot measures to 25.3 cm. However that is mostly one freakishly big large toe.

Would this mold correctly if I have a standard 2 finger shell fit with these boots?

My alpine boot size is 24/24.5, but with the 24.5 liner.
1/18/2018
Reply from Piotr T
 
The alpine boot fits extremely well, and maybe has a tiny bit smaller shell fit.
1/18/2018
Reply from eric
 
Piotr, I just measured the 25 Protour liners to one of our 25/25.5 stock liners and the Protour was a little longer again. The 24 Protour is the same length as the stock liner. Generally the rule of thumb is matching the Protour to the stock liner and if they are the same length then the volume will be very similar after molding. You would just use the Medium Volume over Low Volume depending on the amount of room you need to take up. Although with that said the Low Volume liner will snug up the fit over stock liner, where the Medium Volume liner will take up alot more volume than stock.
1/18/2018
Reply from Piotr T
 
Thank you for the thoughtful reply! I really appreciate it.
Comment on this review:

3/21/2017
Question from Martin
 
Does anyone happen to know whether they can be resoled? Thanks.
3/21/2017
Answer from Nate
 
Hi Martin,

I have a good friend who owns a climbing shoe re-sole business. I've asked him about resoling ski boots and his reply was that they would be very easy to resole, provided one could find the proper sole material. Last we spoke, he still hadn't sourced the material. If you can find it, I'm sure you could get someone to do it.
Answer this question:

3/8/2017
Question from johnny H
 
Hi, im about to order but have no chance to try them on anywhere nearby.
Scarpa F1 27.0 is perfect fit, Spitfire 26.5 is tight but good..after few hours in them i belive it would be super fit as well.
Also Scott Celeste 26.0 seem ok.
So far i have been on Syborgs 27.0 for two seasons. Lately it started to feel really lose in the forefoot (i guess liner needs replacing).
So its obviously 26.5 or 27, but thats where the size breaks so it might feel quite a lot different.
Might trying atomic alpine boot help sorting this?



3/8/2017
Answer from jbo
 
Hi Johnny, you are most definitely a 26/26.5. You likely won't even need to mold the shell, but there is always that option if it does end up a little snug.
Answer this question:

2/13/2017
Question from Kelly
 
Is there any difference in the shape of the shell or liner between this and the women's version? I.e. if I want to have a stiffer boot and don't care about having girly colors, would I get the same fit with this as with the women's backland?
2/13/2017
Answer from Nate
 
Hi Kelly,

The fit should be the same between this and the women's version and definitely should provide the stiffness you are looking for.
Answer this question:

2/13/2017
Question from Kurt P
 
any idea on fit (length wise) of these? I wear 42 cycling shoes, biggest foot is 267mm. Flat, low volume foot.
2/13/2017
Answer from jbo
 
Hi Kurt, you'd likely get a really good length fit with the 26/26.5, but these aren't the best for flat, low volume feet. Visit our boot fitter for more options.
Answer this question:

11/16/2016
by Robert C (downright abused product)
 
About me: 6', 180lbs, 11.5 shoe size, 29.5 in this boot. Wide forefoot, narrow heel. Skied one day in this boot before heat molding. Mostly used with a Fisher Hannibal 94 177mm.

Lots of good info already in reviews here, but I wanted to leave another long term data point. I have been using these boots exclusively the last 12 months, and have skied every one of those months. They have held up very well to all of the rocky, snow covered approach scrambles, as well as cold, long days, and deep pow turns. I appreciate the simplicity of the boot design, which has made, for instance, replacing buckles and such straight forward. I would recommend loctite for critical screws once a season. The tech interface has held up tremendously, as have the soles.

I really like the way these ski, and for my usage, they are downright excellent in terms of balance between weight and performance. Used on steeps, multiday hut to hut trips, and every day touring.

Admittedly, these fit my feet really well, but I have seen these more and more in the backcountry and I believe that is due to the ability to heat mold the liner to a shape that will work with many people's anatomy. If you are looking for a single light boot for backcountry use, this one should be at the top of your list.
Comment on this review:

10/5/2016
Question from Patrick
 
I am curious (baffled) by how the heat molding process works on the shell. Is it one step or do you mold the liners first like a traditional boot fitting to see if the shell even needs adjustment. Seems odd to heat mold the whole shell. Any experiences good or bad with heat molding these shells?
10/5/2016
Answer from jbo
 
Hi Patrick, you can basically stick the whole thing in an Atomic oven, liner and shell. Of course, not everyone needs the shell to be customized, it is a judgement call whether to do just the liner. It seems to work well overall, and can adapt to some wider feet.
Answer this question:

6/11/2016
Question from Eric
 
I have a question about the BSL for these boots.

I have a pair of Skimo skis with Dynafit Superlight 2.0 mounted for the original TLT 5 (Mountain), size 28.5. I would love to replace my old TLT's with the Atomic Backland, but of course the binding isn't adjustable.

What I'm wondering is whether I might be lucky and they might just fit anyway? The BSL for a Backland in size 28.5 is exactly the same as the TLT. But is the distance between the front and back tech fittings also the same?
6/11/2016
Answer from jbo
 
Hi Eric, the BSL for the Backlands is 1mm longer in each boot size. For a 28.5 it's 307 (TLT5) vs 308 (Backland). You'd be shrinking your gap a bit.
6/11/2016
Answer from Eric S
 
Thanks, that's good to know. But ... does the BSL actually reflect the distance between the tech fittings? I figured it means the difference between the front of the toe and the back of the boot, which is a bit different.
6/11/2016
Answer from jbo
 
You figured correctly Eric, the BSL is a sole measurement, not the tech length. However tech fittings are offset from the sole ends by a somewhat standard amount (except when they aren't).
6/11/2016
Answer from Eric S
 
Thanks. So the implication is that I probably need to actually try this to be sure. I will have to crab a pair from a local shop and check it out. But I'll still order stuff from you guys for your trouble if/when I figure out what to do next!
6/11/2016
Answer from jbo
 
Hey Eric, I'm happy to test this out for you when we get more Backland 28s in stock in a couple months.
6/12/2016
Answer from Eric S
 
Thanks, happy to take you up on that (NB: 28.5 is what I am interested in). I would have the same question about the Scarpa F1 (new manual model) when you have them.
9/29/2016
Answer from jbo
 
Hi Eric, the 28/28.5 Atomic measures almost exactly 2mm longer than the TLT5 28, so you will likely need to remount with adjustment plates. The F1 is way off as well.
Answer this question:

1/30/2016
by lance j (downright abused product)
 
I've been in the Backland Carbon all year and have grown to really love this boot. It wasn't always beer and skittles - no matter what I did I couldn't get the liner to work for me (but it is also important to know that I have ankle geometry that is well outside the standard norm - the medial protuberance is positioned fully on the leading edge of that side of my ankle and the tongue just chewed it up no matter what we did to try and flatten that location out). After switching to an Intuition wrap liner I could not be happier, the boots truly have all-day comfort along with outstanding performance pretty much everywhere it matters.

Compared to the TLT6 the cuff of the B/C is noticeably stiffer laterally giving you a better sense of control and leverage on your edges - particularly when conditions get icy. With the tongue in these ski like a solid downhill boot (though the cuff is definitely lower than any downhill boot I've ever skied). The Grilamid shoe does a great job of transferring your power through the ski.

My favorite thing about the boots is the versatility. You can skin with little to no ankle-restriction when the tongue is removed (even with my wrap liner in place of the OE liner). The boots are not what I would call race-able light, but they don't weigh you down when charging out into the backcountry or up the steeps. They're nimble enough to get the most out of an 80-90 underfoot ski, but can drive 100-110+ without making you feel like you're missing something.

The walk-ski lever is simple and solid - an absolute winner in my book. But the tour-keepers on the buckles are the opposite - flimsy and half-functional. Call it nit-picking, but they are why I wouldn't call the boot a 5-star boot, more of a 4.5.

For those with wide feet, this boot will readily accommodate you, with the heat-molding Frodo could probably fit his boxy Hobbit foot in these boots. For me (with a fairly narrow foot) that means that I have had to add shims under the boot liner. While this is less than ideal due to the the extra weight of three layers of fiber boards, the big benefit that I found is that I now have the ramp angle dialed in perfectly so that when I am skiing in a neutral stance my weight is evenly distributed over the full length of my foot. This means that I have no hot-spots or foot fatigue and that I am able to really move my weight around the entire foot to steer my skis.

Final notes:
- The tech-binding hardware is great, and I've had no problems with my Dynafit TLT bindings. Step in is easy and consistent.
- Soles have been durable so far - great for scrambling on rocks or booting your way in when there's a no-snow approach.
- While the weight is fairly low, I can't help but wish that it was possible to shave off another 100g. Seeing all the new boots that are coming for 2016-17 (particularly the Sportiva and Scarpa carbon slippers) makes the geek in me think that getting 100g out should be child's play and more than that shouldn't be too difficult with some material substitutions (ie. more carbon/composite).

The Backland Carbon is a great one-boot quiver for anyone except a weight-weenie/racer, or for big freeride hucking; but, in between those extremes is where this boot really shows you what it can do and just how versatile it is.
Comment on this review:

12/9/2015
Question from Jonathan H
 
How's the cuff height compared to TLT6 and Spectre?

Thoughts on this boot's efficacy at climbing real ice and mixed (say up to WI5 and M7) as compared to the TLT6 and Spectre?
12/9/2015
Answer from jbo
 
Hi Jonathan, the cuff height measures about 5mm lower on this boot in the size 27/27.5 versus the TLT6. I would speculate climbing performance is similar.
Answer this question:

10/17/2015
Question from Max
 
How much will the shells expend to accommodate wide feet. I currently have 100mm lasted boots that I hate and can barely tolerate with a liner for a sock. Can I stretch these out to an effective 102-104mm width?
Also how does the sizing on these run, I fit in a 25.5?
10/17/2015
Answer from jbo
 
Hi Max, we haven't been able to test the limits of the shell mold yet, but I'm told you can get as much as a centimeter of extra width. I just uploaded the Atomic size chart which is good out-of-the-box comfort for skinny-to-average width feet. You can get up to about an 8.25 foot into the 25.5 without shell modification lengthwise.
1/30/2016
Answer from lance j
 
Max, not only can these boots stretch under heat a great deal, with the stock liner there is a ton of room in there for wide feet. Wile I have rather narrow feet, I still love the boots because I could add shims under the liner to get the exact foot angle I wanted on my skis so that I feel perfectly balanced and have my weight distributed over the length of my foot in a neutral skiing stance.
Answer this question:

Write a Review Ask a Question Post a Comment


Your name: (or )

Your e-mail:



Overall rating:
1 star 5 stars
Familiarity:


Your review:

What is 7 + 10?

Your website (optional):



Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
» Compare to other Touring Boots 
© 2018 Skimo Co
View Full Screen Version