Intuition Tour Tongue Liners
Being synonymous with comfort and performance, Intuition has rightfully been atop the leaderboard when it comes to high-quality after-market liners. Taking over from the venerable Pro Tour liner, the Tour Tongue has received subtle design updates that improve upon this already successful formula. As with all Intuition liners, the Tour Tongue is built using a highly customizable foam that when heated, comfortably accommodates many different foot shapes. While the main body of the Tour Tongue uses a moderately compliant dual-density foam, the toebox utilizes a low dual-density foam that aims to provide more comfort during a big day out. Purposefully designed with modern touring boots in mind, the Tour Tongue features a rear flex zone that allows you to capitalize on the impressive range of motion definitive of modern touring boots, allowing you to move quickly and efficiently. Compared to the Pro Tour, the Tour Tongue features a thinner sole thickness, a revised J-bar that allows for better heel hold and ankle support, and a sewn-in tongue for durability. Finally, the Tour Tongue is offered in three thicknesses, allowing you to select the best option for the fit of your boots.
Whether you want to add warmth, performance, or comfort to your existing touring boot, the Tour Tongue is a worthwhile upgrade.
- Fully heat-moldable for a comfortable and individualized fit.
- Low-density foam is strategically used in the toe box, helping provide comfort on big days out.
- Internal J-bar helps to lock down the heel and provide support for bony ankles.
- Rear flex zone allows you to enjoy the excellent range of motion found on modern touring boots.
- Antimicrobial treatment (helps) fight off odor-causing bacteria.
- Included 4mm high-density foam shim allows you to modify liner volume.
- 9mm is low-volume, 12mm is medium volume, and 15mm is high-volume.
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
I'd recommend the 12mm! The 9mm gets pretty close to the fit of the stock liner, whereas the 12mm is noticeably thicker. The 15mm is more than the majority of skiers would want in this boot!
I would go with the 9mm, that will be a bit thicker than the stock liner. You could go with a 12mm as well if you wanted to take up a good bit more space.
I would go with a 9mm Tour Tongue! I think that would be a great drop-in replacement for the stock liner, and pretty comparable in thickness. The 12mm would be too much for most people in this boot.
The 9mm is the closest to the stock liner, but it's a little bit thinner. The 12mm is a good bit thicker. I'd lean towards the 9mm as long as the stock liner wasn't too thin.
The Intuition Tour Tongue would certainly be a suitable replacement! The 9mm is slightly thinner than the stock liner, while the 12mm being thicker. Either are suitable depending on your goals, especially with a heat mold in mind. Being that you may have had some complicated boot fitting work done, send us an email at help@skimo.co and we can dive into the details. Thanks!
Do you have the Zero G Peak or the Zero G Tour Pro/Scout? The 9mm is a bit thick for the Peak but will work. It's a bit thin for the Tour Pro, the 12mm will be closer to the stock liner.
Thanks!
A 9mm would be a bit thin, 12mm a bit thick. Unfortunately there isn't really anything in between the 9 and 12 thickness. I'd say go with the 12mm and mold it aggressively.
I tried the Intuition Tour-Wrap Dd 12Mm Liner in size 29, they fit the lower alright but there was way too much liner around the calf for the shell. Do you think the tongue version would fit better and what length and thickness?
A 12mm Tour Tongue in a 29 would be a great option - similar thickness in the footbox, with less volume in the cuff.
The 9mm Tour Tongue would be the right thickness! It is pretty close to the stock liner, but may be slightly thicker in some places. After heat molding, it will be a nice fit and a good replacement for stock. Intuition liners do need a good heat mold to open up the instep and the toe box, but I agree that the 12mm is too thick for most people in the Ridge boot.
Real quick, looking to replace original Sidas liners in some Salomon MTN Lab's, older blue and yellow versions. That liner seemed to be all right until it wore out. Wondering if you might have a suggestion for mm width with the Intuition tongue tours . . . 9, 12, 15?
Again, thanks!
I would go with the 9mm Tour Tongues in a 28! They may be slightly thicker than stock around the forefoot, but a heat mold should take care of that. Great liners. Alternatively, the Palau Power LT could also be a great option with a little bit thinner foam around the foot, a little closer to the stock fit.
Happy to help! I wouldn't really recommend either of those liners for the Travers. The 15mm will not fit, and the 12mm is still too thick to be appropriate for that boot. I understand that you're trying to take up space, but the Travers was designed around a very thin stock liner and these are simply too big to work properly.
I'd recommend a 9mm Intuition Tour Tongue if you have a preference for Intuition - it will still be a fair amount thicker than stock. Or, our go-to recommendation for a thicker liner for the Travers would be a Palau Power LT. We like the Palaus for lighter weight boots because they walk a bit better and fit well into the lightweight shells.
I got a pair of Scarpa Maestrale RS size 26 near the end of last season. I have been to a couple boot fitters and the shell is a good fit, but I have been getting bad heel blisters. I have added a superfeet insole, experimented with heel lifters and foam around the ankle to improve the heel hold, no luck - still lots of heel movement. I am considering trying the Zipfit GFT for improved heel hold, but they sure look heavy and expensive. Do you think this Tour tongue would substantially improve the heel hold while touring? thanks
Did you heat mold your new Intuition liners? They do need to be heat molded in order to have the best fit out of the box.
If you liked the stock liners, you could just buy those again! That would be the best way to assure that you know what you're getting. The 9mm Tour Tongues could work, but they are a bit thinner than the stock Radical Pro liner. The 12mm Tour Tongue is actually closer, just slightly thicker.
My shells are a 29(305bsl) and the stock liner worked well for me until it packed out.
Does the LV version of this liner seem like a good choice? If not can you recommend something?
You should look at the Alien or Tour LT here - Scarpa liners.
Don't have many sizes now, will have more this season.
Looking to replace the liner in a 2025 ZGTP. Stock liner is OK volume wise but will be too loose soon. Hurts my shin.
I skied 2023 ZGTP before, stock liner was too thin, replaced with well worn (thinned) Pro Tour MV. This liner is too thick in the cuff for the 2025 ZGTP because the designers droppen the third ladder mounting hole, genius. A relatively new MV is way to voluminous.
My shell fit is about 1". 27cm foot in 27.5 shell, need 6th toe punch and instep is tight in the 2025 boot (had to bend it on the 2023).
So I am torn between 9mm and 12mm obviously. Can you guys give me a hint?
If a well-worn 12mm Pro Tour was too thick for you, and a new MV/12mm is definitely too thick, then I think your question has a clear answer! The 9mm is still a decently voluminous liner, it is pretty comparable to the stock liner in thickness.
I am looking to replace very packed in stock liners from my Scarpa Gea (2021) size 24. I’d also like the thicker 12 mm since I also feel have a lot of space around my calves .
I am thinking I’d need size 24 liners? Do you anticipate this model coming back in stock ?
Scarpa sizes land in between regular sizes, so if you have a 24 Gea, it is possible that you could make the size 23 liner work! However, the 24 will provide a little bit more foam, so you could also wait for that. We do anticipate getting more stock of these in soon!
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
