Intuition Tour Tongue Liners
Being synonymous with comfort and performance, Intuition has rightfully been atop the leaderboard when it comes to high-quality after-market liners. Taking over from the venerable Pro Tour liner, the Tour Tongue has received subtle design updates that improve upon this already successful formula. As with all Intuition liners, the Tour Tongue is built using a highly customizable foam that when heated, comfortably accommodates many different foot shapes. While the main body of the Tour Tongue uses a moderately compliant dual-density foam, the toebox utilizes a low dual-density foam that aims to provide more comfort during a big day out. Purposefully designed with modern touring boots in mind, the Tour Tongue features a rear flex zone that allows you to capitalize on the impressive range of motion definitive of modern touring boots, allowing you to move quickly and efficiently. Compared to the Pro Tour, the Tour Tongue features a thinner sole thickness, a revised J-bar that allows for better heel hold and ankle support, and a sewn-in tongue for durability. Finally, the Tour Tongue is offered in three thicknesses, allowing you to select the best option for the fit of your boots.
Whether you want to add warmth, performance, or comfort to your existing touring boot, the Tour Tongue is a worthwhile upgrade.
- Fully heat-moldable for a comfortable and individualized fit.
- Low-density foam is strategically used in the toe box, helping provide comfort on big days out.
- Internal J-bar helps to lock down the heel and provide support for bony ankles.
- Rear flex zone allows you to enjoy the excellent range of motion found on modern touring boots.
- Antimicrobial treatment (helps) fight off odor-causing bacteria.
- Included 4mm high-density foam shim allows you to modify liner volume.
- 9mm is low-volume, 12mm is medium volume, and 15mm is high-volume.
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
Thanks for your time.
I have test fit a 12mm Tour Tongue in that boot, it is doable although it will tighten things up substantially and fill a lot more space. The 9mm Tour Tongue is a bit thicker than the stock liner, it does tighten up the ankle and cuff a little. It isn't as drastic, of course.
You could consider the 9mm Tour Wrap - I think the 12 would be too big. But if you have a snug fit in the forefoot, but a loose fit in the calf area, that is exactly what the wrap liners are good for - they have more padding in the shin compared to a tongue liner and will fill up calf and ankle space. The 9mm Wrap will also give you more breathing room in the forefoot, compared to the 12mm Tongue.
The Tour Tongue is the replacement for the Pro Tour in Intuition's line. There are a few minor differences including a thinner sole and a sewn-in tongue. However, for the most part they are pretty equivalent liners. Both are great Intuition foam that takes a heat mold very well.
Between the two thicknesses, with a two-finger fit I think you will be happier with the 12mm thickness especially if the goal is to tighten things up around the heel. You will need to heat mold it to get a comfortable fit, as it will likely feel tight initially. But they will mold out quite well, as I'm sure you've experienced with Intuitions in the past.
For size, you'll want a 28 liner for your 28/28.5 shell.
Thanks!
If they are more then a bit loose on you now, go with the 12mm.
I’ve liked the stock liner just fine, but they are ready to be replaced.
I don’t have much room in the 29.5, maybe a finger to a finger and a half in the shell.
Thoughts on replacement liner? I was looking at the Pro Tour…seems very similar to the stock liner(?). Thanks!
A 12mm would be a good option!
With over a two finger fit, you should use the Med/12mm liner.
But have a very tall instep and looking for less thickness. One good thing is this new version has a thinner sole to accommodate your instep. I believe you are saying they were snug around the foot too, if so, then the 9mm may be the better chocie.
Which liners should I order and what size?
Warmly
I would go with these Intuition Tour Tongues in the 12mm thickness, same size as your boot (27). You will need to heat mold them for the best fit/to create room at the toe box, but these are one of the best matches for the Tecnica. If you have a very tight fit and want a thin liner, you could go with the 9mm, but I think most folks will be happier with the 12mm.
Do you think the Tour Tongue 15mm is the right choice? What size, 26 or 27mm?
The 15mm Tour Tongue is pretty thick! If you like how the volume of the MV Pro Tour feels in that boot (cuff damage aside), I would go with a 12mm Tour Tongue. If you feel like you need more, then yes, the 15mm will take up the most space. My only concern is the cuff area. If you have a tight fit in the cuff already with the stock liner, 15mm may be too much foam to buckle the cuff effectively. If you have a looser fit in this area too, I'd feel fine about the 15mm.
We generally recommend going with the same size liner as your boot, so in your case, 26. However, you frequently can squeeze the next size up in there. In that case, you will be getting potentially a taller cuff, and a tighter fit in general (more liner relative to the same shell).
You could also consider a shim under your liner if the liner upgrade doesn't quite tighten up the volume enough for you.
I'm thinking about swapping out old stock liners on a size 25.5 TLT7. Do you think the LVs will fit? Will they be any warmer? And is it a significant mobility loss compared to stock liners? Thanks!
I think the 9mm Tour Tongues would be a great option for you. They will likely be a bit warmer than stock, and more padded. You will need to heat mold them for the best fit. In terms of mobility, they might feel a bit more restrictive than stock, but it shouldn't be too bad. I would expect them to loosen up a little bit as well with use.
They fit fine after a few tours (never needed a heat mold).
For the new liners, expecting a 70/30 backcountry to resort use... but weight is no issue as I have separate 'lite' touring boot combo.
Will these work/ are these the best replacement option?
Do this seem like a good approach?
Thanks!
Yes, but depending on how narrow your foot is, I might err on the side of caution and try the 12mm; most stock liners don't run as high as 12mm, and sit around 8mm, so if you need 'a bit' more volume, 12mm might do it.
If you think you really need that extra volume and will just wait for it to pack out or liner mold, then go for 15mm.
I have a pair of Technica Cochise 95w's. I was fitted for women's boots as they fit my ankles and instep better. I'd like to get a new boot, but don't want to spend that much at the moment. My two main issues are:
1) The liners have packed out and I have space over the instep
2) I want a stiffer boot. These are stiffer than most 95 flex boots I've tried, probably close to a 105 men's flex, but I'd like a boot with less give.
I ski about 60% touring, 40% resort. Would these liners be a good choice for my use?
To help decreasing volume over the instep, if it won't ruin the fit at the heel and ankle, I would try thicker footbeds or a shim to lift you up a little bit in the shell, decreasing the volume above your foot. This is a cheaper and sometimes better fix than new liners. However, a thicker liner may help take up some of that space (although all liners pack out). If your liners are more than ~50-60 ski days old, and only recently got bad, then new liners are in order. If they packed out to be too loose within 10 days or so, new liners may not fare much better. To take up more space, go with the medium or high volume thickness in these (12mm or 15mm). I would only go 15mm if you also need to take up space in the cuff.
I don't think these would add a significant amount of stiffness over the stock Cochise liner. Maybe a little. But it won't change the flex of the boot dramatically. Ultimately, your problems will best be solved by shells that fit your foot better and are an appropriate flex. But hopefully with some footbeds/shims you can improve the fit of the current boots so that they are a more secure fit.
Any suggestions there? Thanks!
Slightly confused here, this replacement of the pro tour looks a LOT heavier? It says 530gr ish while it used to be 300gr ish? Can you confirm that?
We've gotten this question before, I think the published weights from Intuition must be off. I recently weighed a pair of 26 liners from both the older Pro Tours and the new Tour Tongues, in the same volume. The Tour Tongues were only 10 grams heavier in the same size. So there is very little weight difference between them.
Thanks!
Just to be clear, are you planning on going to a size 27 Skorpius shell, or staying with the 26? If you're staying with the 26 shell, a larger liner size will actually make the boot tighter, by adding more material to the shell. So I would not size up the liner without also sizing up the shell.
The Tour Tongues will walk better than the Tour Wrap. I would only consider the Low or Medium volume in the Skorpius - high would be too thick for that boot. Honestly, my inclination would be to go with the low volumes for that boot, given that it is a pretty low volume shell with a small cuff. Warmth is partially about insulation, but also about how tight your feet are being squeezed in the boot. Too tight a fit can limit circulation leading to cold feet. That said, if you've been making the Wraps work, the medium volume Tour Tongue should be doable.
The best way to create more room in the toes will be to use a thick toe cap during the heat mold - we always recommend heat molding all Intuition liners before use due to the dense, but very moldable foam that they use.
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
