Salomon’s first tech binding, the MTN. If you think it looks an awful lot like the Atomic Backland, that’s because it is. The companies are related, meaning you can ensure proper color coordination on your setup with identical functionality. If you look good, you feel good. If you feel good, your skiing will likely be just as good. The MTN binding is light, fully featured, and fool-proof (no fools were harmed in our testing). The toe piece features a large, sturdy lever that’s easy to manipulate with frozen hands or thick gloves. A wide mounting pattern improves power transfer on wide skis, so you can confidently use the same binding on both your mountaineering and powder skis. A retractable toe guide makes it easier than ever to step into the binding and disappears once your boot is in, making technical skin tracks a breeze. The unique heel-piece features a “semi-adjustable” release value. The MTN binding includes three separate release value fork assemblies that can easily be swapped. Notably the spring swap changes both the lateral and forward release values, creating one of the lightest bindings with adjustment for release and boot sole length. The springs assemblies are labeled “Women, Men, and Expert,” but we would like to take a moment to humbly note that there are many women of the Wasatch and beyond that can ski harder than the Women's spring would safely allow. The heel housing sits on top of a stout baseplate with 30mm of fore-aft adjustment built in. On the roof are two risers strategically machined to keep weight to a minimum and durability to a maximum. Twist the heel housing 90° and you get a flat mode which makes long approaches much easier. The Salomon MTN binding is one of the most user-friendly tech bindings we have seen.
A mere 592g per pair, the MTN binding is as light as it is burly.
Integrated crampon receptor minimizes extra parts to deal with, lose, or break.
Included leash can be used to set the heel gap at home or in the field.
Women’s, Men’s, and Expert springs included for customizable release values.
Two risers plus a flat mode adapt to the oncoming terrain.
Wide mounting platform for high-speed stability and power transfer.
Machined risers add versatility at a minimal weight.
Long toe lever for extra leverage switching modes.
Note: This binding accepts both Plum and Dynafit crampons, though with the latter the included crampon keeper clip must be used to prevent any lateral movement during use.
Teague, The keeper clip comes with the bindings. It is not available from Dynafit. Scroll way down and there are some pictures of it attached to a Dynafit crampon, very useful. The Plum crampon does not require the clip and can be easier to use.
This binding is by far the easiest tech binding to get into. Skimo set them up for my Tlt 8’s and they are truly a breeze to snap into every time. The heel risers haven’t loosed one bit after a ton of use. No issues just all Positives with this binding. Thanks for a great product Salomon/Atomic and thank you skimo for the great mount.
I am fairly new to the ski touring world, I have one season on heavy BD skis with frame bindings that I got as a cheap entry-level setup. I recently got a pair of Salomon QST 106 (188) (2020) skis and am looking at all my options for the best binding to pair with them (I like Salomon products, not for any reason in particular). I have no experience with tech bindings, and am afraid of choosing a binding that would not hold up to the stress I may put on the skis. Because of this I am looking at the Shift and the MTN, with mostly backcountry days in mind, with a few resort days scattered here and there. I have read that these are as strong as I would ever need (not expert level but I ski fairly hard), and am very intrigued by the weight savings. But, I am curious if there is a hypothetical limit to the size and weight of myself and my skis that would cause someone to lean towards one binding or the other? Thanks in advance!
If the goal is truly to go lighter in the backcountry I would lean heavily towards the MTN binding over the Shift. The MTN is a burly bugger that can handle a 106 ski without issue and overall will be more streamlined for transitions between climbing and rippin' downhill lines. The bindings come with 3 spring tension options and if you are worried about pre-releasing you can put in the "Expert" springs. Have fun out there!
I have the Atomic Backland bindings (same as Salomon MTN bindings), and having big issues with floppy heel risers (they will flop over into lifted position on a flat skin track with a decent glide). I basically have to ski in the middle position all the time. My local ski shop where I purchased the binding has been pretty unhelpful when it comes to fixing it, and apparently Atomic doesn't sell replacement parts at all. Do you have any access to parts or some kind of solution for the floppy heel risers? I have tried zip ties, elastics, locktite etc. but it always end up as a temporary fix (lasts 3 outings at the most). Thanks.
I have 2 pr of these in my quiver, used over 3 years. ~90 days across both pr. I have skied these almost exclusively unlocked. I've skied them at resorts a couple times in quite variable conditions. My alpine din is usually set to 12. I use the "EXP" spring. I have never had a pre-release, even in absolutely tooth rattling conditions.
Longtime dynafit user. Broke several heelpieces last winter, looking for a new binding, deciding between the Ion and the Salomon MTN/Atomic Backland. Will not ski at all in ski area. Not planning on brakes. Seems they are similar, though the Ion is heavier but more tried and tested, whereas the salomon/atomic seems to have an issue with the riser becoming too flimsy/mobile/flopping around after 10-20 uses. Have you guys seen this riser issue much in the shop? Can you comment? Thanks so much.
Scott, haven't heard of that compliant. They have a nice solid clip and do not use a spring that gives out on some other bindings. It is the slickest riser system out there. And have had virtually no warranties.
Have y'all ever mounted the brakeless version of this without the plastic heel baseplate/shim? I was just fiddling around with it and realized it comes off. I like the idea of no plastic on the binding so it crossed my mind to mount without it. What would this do to skiability/touring?
Hey Steve, the main issue here would be screw length. You may need to find shorter screws or modify the existing ones so that you don’t risk dimpling your bases. Should be fine, it’ll flatten out your pin height delta and make it just a bit lighter.
I have the Kreuszspitze GT with quiver killers which I have been super impressed with. They are my goto binding for any big day or multi day trips. I just bought some Blizzard ZG 108s which I'm going to use for day tours and side country w/ some in-bounds thrown in and am thinking I might want something slightly beefier with dedicated ski brakes for that set up. Looking at the Atomic/Solomon MTN bindings or maybe the Plum Guide. Plum is slightly heavier and my Dynafit crampons won't work (right?) but they look like they are built super well and its an established design. Atomic/Solomon look good on paper but the issues mentioned with the riser tabs are a concern to me. What are your thoughts on these options...or any others you think would be a good match...or should I just get another set of quiver killers and save $600!?
Hi Brent, these Atomic/Salomon bindings have been absolutely excellent performers. Given the number that we have sold, I'm thoroughly impressed by them and I have seen them used very very hard. I personally have not seen any come back for warranty and the comment about the heel flaps is the first I've heard. I would go for it. The odds are that you will be super happy with these bindings.
I have this same issue and am in the process of a warranty with salomon however they wont have any more of these in stock until next fall so we may just have to deal with it until next winter. It does sound like theyll make it right but its annoying and Ill probably have to replace the heels every spring...
Hey Richard! It's entirely possible, though not on the table at the moment. I am keeping my fingers crossed for individual availability of toes and heels in the near future as the toes are amazing in their own way and the heels are amazing in their own way as well, so it'd be fun to use them as a franken-binding. It sounds like you already know where to look for toes and heels individually, so I won't bother you there, but for anybody else that's reading this, you can find toes and heels separately here.
I've had these for a season, and really like them. Low weight, easy risers, Super positive engagement ( tour with Toe in ski mode 90% of the time, for added safety in avy terrain)
However the heel lifters/riser assembly came loose. It is attached with a hex screw, but the only way I could figure out how to access it was to unmount the binding from the ski. Did I miss something? In order to get to the screw, you have to back the adjustment screw out all the way, and slide the heel tower off the mounting plate - which seemed impossible while still on the ski.
Anyway, hoping with loc-tite it stays put ... because it isn't ideal to have to back out the mounting screws to maintain the heel unit. ( I'm used to my dynafits that come apart more easily )
I'm trying to decide between the ATK Haute Route 2.0 and these. The ATK's are much lighter on paper. However, not being able to get my hands on a pair of the ATK's and not finding any videos online, I'm not sure if you can turn the heel piece to get to a position where you can access the flat, ~36, and 50mm modes. Does anybody have any insight? Thanks!
Hey John! They don't release laterally from the toe in the way that you are probably thinking. The lateral release initiates from the heel piece rotating and the toe piece follows suit. Release value is more along the lines as these bindings don't meet the "DIN" certification but it is adjusted via the varying U-Springs that come with the binding.
I'm wondering if the mount hole pattern on these is different enough from the ATK Haute Route 2.0 to remove the ATK's and go with these at the 0 mount position? The ATK's are my first foray into superlite and they are that and built incredibly well but I'm not a fan of rotating the heel piece for flat and high riser mode. The old stick your hand in powder and slide your pack into your head over and over isn't ideal.
Ive been on these bindings about 9 days so far this season and I am blown away, they're quite impressive. Relatively light, but not race light. 290g wont slow anyone down and having 3 riser heights is great. The highest riser is about the right height if you have a pretty mobile boot. In Vulcan's they feel like a higher riser would be nice but in tlt6 boots they feel perfect. Icy jump turns, pow days, and everything in between, they do very well. They feel bomber. Ive release from the heel and not the toe several times and never released completely, yet...
I though it would be useful for folks considering this binding to recognize that they accept Dynafit, ATK *AND* Plum crampons. The great thing about the Plum crampons is that they drop in from the top, rather than slide from the side. Much easier, and far more secure, and less prone to icing.