K2 Wayback 106 Ski

Hello, I just purchased the 186 K2 Wayback 106 and wondering about recommended mounting points that deviate from the manufacturer's recommendations of -13cm. I live in Ak, seek the powder, but will inevitably get variable conditions more often than not. I prefer a freestyle centered stance but can drive the ski when needed. I am 5'10" and 220lbs. Is there any data out there about bumping the bindings forward?

When de-cambering these skis with my hands or with a ski strap at the recommended mount point, is it normal for there to be multiple gaps between the tip and tail?

In other words, when de-cambered at the mount point, the skis touch in three spots: near the tip taper, the mount point, and near the tail taper (kind of like triple camber almost); where I would normally expect continuous contact from the tip to tail taper points.

Is this expected? Can someone confirm? I'm wondering if this will compromise grip on the skin track.

Thinking about these as a Southcentral AK daily driver, so mostly pow but need to hold an edge in occasional firm steeps and survive breakable crust. I've been on the Dynastar Mythic Pros for a couple seasons and am over the short turn radius (although love the light weight). Also considering The Voile Hypercharger, Blizzard Zero G 105 or 95, and the Atomic Backland 100s. Thanks for any thoughts!

I am trying to confirm if I am making the right choice with these skis. I previously asked about the MTN Explore 95s, and they do appear to be a good fit, however, I decided to eventually go with these as a hedge for days where the snow is deeper. I am opting for the 179 cm as I am told the K2s tend to run long. The one aspect I am unsure of is the turning radius, even for the 179 cm length, it is listed at 22 m. This is 3 m larger than the MTNs and 3.5 m larger than my resort daily drivers. Is this something I am really going to notice? I am just concerned about the ability to execute short radius turns or survival turns when controlling speed is important like on a really steep pitch.

About myself, I am 185.4 cm (73 inches) tall, weigh 86.2 kg (190 pounds), and classify myself as a type III skier. I have not skied any back country with the exception of one day where I rented my gear, but I do want to start skiing backcountry in addition to my resort alpine skiing. My current setup for resort skiing are a pair of Nordica Enforcer 104 Free, 186 cm length. For my backcountry setup, I have already purchased and fitted a pair of Scarpa Maestrale boots. For bindings, I am going to be running the Fritschi Tecton 12 due to its downhill performance with release capability, while not being as heavy as some other tech bindings with these features. As far as what I will primarily be skiing, I want flexibility to ski in all kinds of conditions in the PNW (Washington).

I'm still in the honeymoon phase but I have the 179's mounted on the line with hagan pure 10's and the k2 skins and it's been a great setup so far. Versatile and capable at a reasonably light weight. I echo what Anthony O has already written and use these in the PNW where things snow tends to be a bit heavier on a regular basis.

5 stars to Jeff for patiently answering all my questions over a 4 week period as I dialed in my target setup as well as the overall skimo crew.

This is a great ski that is great because it is bad at nothing, not because it excels anywhere. Ive been playing on it with speed radical toes and plum 170 heels for the start of this season. Ive found it reliable, predictable, and easy to control in a variety of conditions from neck deep blower, to icy garbage. It has a higher turn radius than some of its competitors, and while not very stiff, is no noodle either. It is capable in pow and in hardpack if you find yourself on it (i know that doesnt happen in utah). While it doesnt amaze me, i have no problems giving it a strong recommendation for skiers that may like to think they ski pow everyday, but may find other "conditions." This ski will keep you happy with its reliability either way.

Hey ya'll, I'm in the market for a ski to replace my Carbon Converts as a daily, powder hunting ski. While I like light I'm willing to gain some weight in order to add versatility and stability in crappy snow (which I feel the Convert lacked). I ski around Bend, OR so 1-2 feet of medium density snow is a good day. This ski looks attractive but I'm open to suggestions. I'm 6' and 180lbs and only a moderately capable skier. If my skis leave the ground it's usually because I've messed something up, although I do enjoy small airs. I'll be skiing these with TLT7s and Helio 200 binders. Thanks for the input! You guys rock as always.