SCARPA 4 Quattro XT Boot
It's no secret that quality ski gear doesn’t come free. Therefore, it’s a welcome occurrence when manufacturers create a, “quiver killer,” or something that can fill multiple roles. When the ski boot whisperers at SCARPA decided to throw their hat into the ring, they knew they needed the guidance of an elite athlete who understood the intricacies of a piste performance boot. Thus started their relationship with Bode Miller, who is one of the most decorated ski racers in the world. The first child of their collaboration is the 4-Quattro. With its ability to be used in a GripWalk binding, stout 130 flex, and 4 buckle construction, the 4-Quattro fills this "quiver killer" role with poise. However, don’t be lulled into thinking the 4-Quattro is a downhill-oriented one-trick pony. It boasts an exceptional 61-degree range of motion and low weight for its class, meaning that even the longest of skin tracks won’t feel too laborious. From carving groomers, side-country laps, or big days in the backcountry, the 4-Quattro is ready for them all.
- Grilamid Bio and Pebax round out a hardy and more environmentally friendly construction.
- Presa sole works with GripWalk bindings further expanding the reach of this boot.
- 4PRO Flex XT liner is made by Intuition and heat moldable for a customized fit.
- Power straps are made by Booster strap, helping get maximum power transfer from the boot.
- Shell and cuff are plant-based, lessening the environmental impact of the boot.
| Specifications | |
|
Weight |
1480g [27] 1520g [27.5] |
| Weight (pair) | 2960g [27] 3040g [27.5] |
|
|
4 + Power Strap |
|
Boot Sole |
282mm [24.5/25.0] 290mm [25.5/26.0] 299mm [26.5/27.0] 308mm [27.5/28.0] 316mm [28.5/29.0] 324mm [29.5/30.0] 333mm [30.5/31.0] 341mm [31.5/32.0] 350mm [32.5/33.0] |
|
Binding |
Tech, Hybrid, GripWalk |
|
Cuff |
61° |
|
Forward |
15°, 17°, 19° |
| Specs Verified | Yes |
| Design | |
|
|
Grilamid Bio with Carbon Core, Pebax |
|
|
4PRO Flex XT |
|
|
Presa Ski-01/GripWalk Tour |
| Skimo Co Says | |
| Usage | Inbounds and backcountry skiing |
| Notes | One of the lightest hybrid boots on the market |
| Bottom Line | A hard-charging "quiver of one" for resort and backcountry |
| Compare to other Freeride Boots | |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
11/11/2022
How's the cuff volume on these? The only 'freeride' touring boots that can snug up well on my chicken legs are the Hawx Ultra XTDs. Only problem is that those boots are not too kind to my forefoot, and I wish that the Instep height was a little lower.
11/12/2022
Hi Michael,
The 4 Quattro has pretty average calf volume considering the low volume fit in the forefoot. I think it would be worth filling out a boot fitter to figure out a liner and boot combo that makes more sense for your foot!
The 4 Quattro has pretty average calf volume considering the low volume fit in the forefoot. I think it would be worth filling out a boot fitter to figure out a liner and boot combo that makes more sense for your foot!
Answer this question:
11/4/2022
How is this compared to the Maestrale XT in height on the leg, stiffness/downhill performance and fit?
11/4/2022
Hi Espen,
Fit-wise, the Quattro is narrower and has a much lower instep than the Maestrale XT. The downhill performance is similar enough that the deciding factor will certainly be which one fits your foot better. If you'd like, you can fill out our boot fitter and we'll let you know what would be the best fit for you!
Fit-wise, the Quattro is narrower and has a much lower instep than the Maestrale XT. The downhill performance is similar enough that the deciding factor will certainly be which one fits your foot better. If you'd like, you can fill out our boot fitter and we'll let you know what would be the best fit for you!
Answer this question:
10/31/2022
Looking at this for a patrol boot for the east coast. How warm are these boots for extended periods of time?
10/31/2022
Hi Ross,
The 4 Quattro has a pretty robust intuition liner for a backcountry ski boot. However, Compared with a traditional resort boot, the liner is definitely thinner. These boots will run cooler, especially when not moving around a lot, or just riding lifts.
Keep in mind, everyone's number of cold injuries and circulation is different!
The 4 Quattro has a pretty robust intuition liner for a backcountry ski boot. However, Compared with a traditional resort boot, the liner is definitely thinner. These boots will run cooler, especially when not moving around a lot, or just riding lifts.
Keep in mind, everyone's number of cold injuries and circulation is different!
Answer this question:
10/31/2022
Hi, I'm looking for a (1 does most) set up to travel with. This will involve colder conditions, and a blend of lift served, sidecountry, heli/cat, combo lift served touring. I normally use Movement Alptracks 89 + Marker Alpinist and Fischer Traverse carbon for dedicated touring. I use scarpa + Volkl Kendo + 22 designs Tele for lift served.
Please can you suggest a ski and binding to go with the Scarpa Quattro boot ? I'm thinking a 95mm-100m waist ski in the 1500-1700g range and a binding that I can tour or use in the resort. I like the way the Marker Alpinist skis but am unsure about the suitability for mechanised access. Thanks
Please can you suggest a ski and binding to go with the Scarpa Quattro boot ? I'm thinking a 95mm-100m waist ski in the 1500-1700g range and a binding that I can tour or use in the resort. I like the way the Marker Alpinist skis but am unsure about the suitability for mechanised access. Thanks
10/31/2022
Thanks for reaching out, Jonathon! Here would be a few options worth considering:
Skis: Dynafit Free 97 or Salomon MTN Explore 95
Bindings: Dynafit ST Rotation or ATK Raider 12.
If you wish to chat specifics about any of these products, please reach out to us at help@skimo.co!
Skis: Dynafit Free 97 or Salomon MTN Explore 95
Bindings: Dynafit ST Rotation or ATK Raider 12.
If you wish to chat specifics about any of these products, please reach out to us at help@skimo.co!
Answer this question:
Folks considering these boots may find it useful to know that the fit is definitely much better for narrow/low volume feet than the tradiational Scarpa fit (e.g., Maestrale). I am extremely happy with the fit, which I have not been able to say about Scarpa AT boots.
It may also be of interest to know that contrary to reports on at least two "review" sites I've seen, the fit of the SL version of this boot is not any different. I checked with calipers: it's identical, as one would expect given that Scarpa would obviously be using the same mold.
Full disclosure: I have not yet got these on the snow. I will update this review once the season is underway!
It may also be of interest to know that contrary to reports on at least two "review" sites I've seen, the fit of the SL version of this boot is not any different. I checked with calipers: it's identical, as one would expect given that Scarpa would obviously be using the same mold.
Full disclosure: I have not yet got these on the snow. I will update this review once the season is underway!
Comment on this review:
10/10/2022
Thanks for the answer below Jeff. More stated ROM is great, but I've found that often stated ROM isn't really the limiter in how good a boot feels to walk. Instead it's how much friction there is in the walk mode (I.e. the Maestrale feels like you have to put in more effort to move the boot within it's ROM than the ZGTP and similarly the ZGTP has more friction within it's ROM than the Radical). How does the 4 Quattro compare in this regard?
10/11/2022
Hi Adam, you are right. Mostly it comes down to the liners and opening the cuff buckles. Scarpa of course does a great job with their custom Intuition liners to make a free pivoting cuff. They did quite well in the Quattro. The liners are noticeably less thick then the liners in the Maestrale. I test with and without unbuckling the cuff. The Quattro does need to be fully unbuckled to get the the ROM.
10/11/2022
Hi Adam, you are correct, the range of motion tells less than half the story. The Quattro is actually a decent walking beef boot: noticeably better than the Maestrale, similar to the ZGTP, and not quite approaching the Radical Pro.
Answer this question:
10/10/2022
Hey Guys,
Any idea how these will fit compared to the Zero G Tour Pro of F1LT (I know thats in a totally different class of boots)
I have a size 26 F1LT that fits well and a 26.5 ZGTP that feels a little bigger than I would like.
Thanks!
Any idea how these will fit compared to the Zero G Tour Pro of F1LT (I know thats in a totally different class of boots)
I have a size 26 F1LT that fits well and a 26.5 ZGTP that feels a little bigger than I would like.
Thanks!
10/11/2022
Justin, They are lower volume then both of those. Width is comparable, but feels smaller out of the box. I ski the Alien RS (F1 LT lower shell) and the Quattro feels a good bit lower over the instep. But doable.
Answer this question:
10/6/2022
How does the walk mode on these compare to the Maestrale RS and/or the Dynafit Radical Pro?
10/6/2022
Adam, All great boots, all very different fits.
The new Quattro wins for cuff rotation. The numbers are just one degree more, but it feel like more. Awesome for a Very stiff 4 buckle boot. The fit is very low volume, so someone whos skis a Maestrale or Radical Pro is very unlikely to fit in the Quattro.
The new Quattro wins for cuff rotation. The numbers are just one degree more, but it feel like more. Awesome for a Very stiff 4 buckle boot. The fit is very low volume, so someone whos skis a Maestrale or Radical Pro is very unlikely to fit in the Quattro.
Answer this question:
9/21/2022
This boot confuses me - it's listed as a hybrid but apparently walks better than many "pure" options in the category while remaining competitively light.
For those of us with dialled alpine boots looking for a pure touring boot - could this be a good option (Assuming that it fits).
How would you describe the fit profile? What shape foot works best? In my case I'm dealing with a narrower heel, slimmer calf and tall instep. My forefoot is about average width.
For those of us with dialled alpine boots looking for a pure touring boot - could this be a good option (Assuming that it fits).
How would you describe the fit profile? What shape foot works best? In my case I'm dealing with a narrower heel, slimmer calf and tall instep. My forefoot is about average width.
9/21/2022
Thanks for reaching out, Ryan. Very simply, if you prioritize downhill performance, this could be used as a dedicated touring boot. If you want something that is a bit more balanced up and down, a touring boot would be great to check out. From my experience, this is the lowest volume boot (when downsized) in the freeride category. For example, going with the 25.5-26.0 Quattro vs a 26.0-26.5 size from another brand. The Quattro has a tight heel/ankle, average forefoot, with a fairly low instep. For more of an in-depth boot recommendation, please check out our online bootfitter here.
Answer this question:
8/16/2022
Your boot size selector lists, e.g., 28, 28.5, and 29.
Are there actually three differnet shell sizes in that group? Or is 28.5 = 29 as in all other Scarpa iterations?
I'm curious because 28 Scarpas are too short for me, usually. And 29s are too wide!
Thanks!
Are there actually three differnet shell sizes in that group? Or is 28.5 = 29 as in all other Scarpa iterations?
I'm curious because 28 Scarpas are too short for me, usually. And 29s are too wide!
Thanks!
8/16/2022
Eric, Still no true half sizes in ski boots. The 28.5/29 are the same in Scarpa sizing.
Please note that not all Scarpas are the same width. They are advertising these as 100mm last, which is narrower than the F1 and Maestrale. Maybe this will be the one for you.
Please note that not all Scarpas are the same width. They are advertising these as 100mm last, which is narrower than the F1 and Maestrale. Maybe this will be the one for you.
3/21/2023
Hello, is a good choice for narrow heel, wide forefoot (105last at 25.5 mondo) and high arch(high instep) ?
3/21/2023
I dunno. Fits me very well but my foot is narrow heel and narrow forefoot.
3/21/2023
Cernestean, this would not be the boot for you. This boot is low volume throughout the foot so it likely would be too tight for your instep/forefoot.
Answer this question:
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
