Palau Tour Lite Pro Evo Liners
Palau is the liner supplier for Dynafit, La Sportiva, Fischer, and other well-known boot brands. This is because the 100% closed-cell EVA foam is highly moldable and offers great thermal retention. Being European, Palau of course didn’t forget to make their liners walk really well with strategic cutouts in the ankle and tongue-designs that don’t impede skinning. The Tour Lite Pro Evo liners are medium thickness, lightweight, with an Achilles flex zone and a Velcro closure. This model makes a great replacement for stock liners found on the SCARPA F1, Sportiva Sytron/Sideral, Dynafit TLT6/7, and other high-performance ski touring boots.
- 100% closed-cell EVA foam is very receptive to molding.
- Tongue-design doesn’t interfere with walking like an overlap.
- Velcro flap-system offers better calf-wrap and contact while skiing.
- Flex-zone behind the ankle allows for unimpeded skinning and booting.
- 8mm thick, Medium Density is light, flexible, yet reasonably warm.
- Compatible with TLT6, 7, Fischer Travers, F1, Spitfire and similar models.
Update 2023/24: This model was replaced by Palau Tour Lite Evo MV Liners.
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
I think the closest match would be the Palau Power LT, which is a lower volume liner but more substantial than the Tour Lite, with a bit of a thicker tongue similar to the stock Transalp Pro liner.
My boots are 29 and I got the 29 liners. My feet are on the line between 28.5/29. I have appreciated the extra volume and find them comfortable. I've used them regularly for the last month and have not molded them yet, I was able to get a good fit by adjusting my footbeds only. They tour great, I don't notice any restricted motion. They also fill out the calf area better than the stock liners for my skinny legs. They feel great skiing. I'd definitely buy them again.
This Palau liner might be a little thinner than you want for a Zero G Tour Pro. It is designed more for lightweight boots. I think the Palau Power LT would be a better replacement for the stock liner, which would more closely resemble the original fit of the boot. The Intuition tongue liners would fill a little more space and would also work very well, after a heat mold. 9mm might be a bit closer to stock whereas 12mm will definitely be a little thicker.
I have an old pair of Dynafit One U 28.0 which I can’t give up because they’re just too comfy and they ski well. I have a big two finger shell fit, but they’re just about right across the forefoot, and my heels are always locked down. I want to replace the stock packed out liners and also save some weight because I guess I’m committed to this heavier PU shell. I think a Palau liner would save me almost 200g / boot, but I’m looking for advice regarding the best replacement for fit.?
Regards,
Gordon
GP
We don't have these weights published, but I measure the 28.5 Tour Lite Pro Evo at 187g, the 28.5 Power LT (without laces) at 218g, and the 28.0 All Track Power (without laces) at 230g.
Out of what you carry which liners might work in snowboard boots?
Thanks
Thanks
I have La Sportiva spitfire 2.1 28.5 and need new liner. Need more warm and a little bit space for my wide metatarsal. Which Palau would you recomend and what size? Thank you.
Questions:
Which is better for the F1 LT?
How do these two compare with the stock liner of the F1 LT?
What size would I get?
The Palau Tour Lite Pro Evo will fill out some additional space as compared with the stock liner in the F1 LT. The Palau Tour Lite Pro is lower volume than the Evo, and will likely be closer to the fit of the stock liner.
As for sizing , I would get the 27.5 for a 28.0 F1 LT.
I also have another question: my girlfriend has scarpa F1 21.5-22 I would like to put liner on her with a better or flexible gait (palau TOUR evo) it would take her a 22.. Do you think you will receive any soon? or with you another options
thank you
This could be better via email. help@skimo.co
The difference between the Tour Lite Pro's is only one mm. And the thickness of stock liners is not noted and hard to compare with the Palau.
Plus other variables. Stock liners frequently have more shape to them. Then foam densities. The TLT boots now use a denser Ultralon foam, that is more supportive. Comparing the two, the EVO will probably not be any thicker then the stock liner.
tanks
First, have you explored the idea of adding a good footbed and maybe padding the Achilles area?
Otherwise, You would want to go with the EVO liner. Both this one and the Power LT are 8mm in the foot, but the Power LT cuff is quite thick and would not be good match for a Light boot.
I have a pair of technical zero G scout in 27.5
The stock liners have pretty much perfect volume around my foot (high instep), but I have pressure points around my ankles (medial and lateral malleolus)- especially when in touring mode. I’ve had the boots punched, which has improved things a bit
The stock liners have minimal padding around the ankles
How will these compare (perfect for me would be the same volume in the foot, more padding in the ankle/ calf)
I pulled a liner from a Scout boot and compared to the Palau liner. The Tecnica liner was a bit thicker, firmer and more molded. When it comes to pressure points, punching is the answer. Even though Tecnica has designed their boots to punch well, there is Plastic memory and punches tend to go back some to the original shape. So get punch again and More. Maybe adding boot foam around those spots will also help alleviate the hurt.
I've padded it with boot foam, without much effect
Do you think a Power LT liner might work?
Or should I just put up with it
It's not too bad in ski mode, but hurts in walk mode after a while
In comparison, my travers CS are the most comfortable boots I've ever had
The Power LT liners could be better. They are more of a performance match to the Scout boot. Thicker at the cuff, that may help around the top of your ankle bone.
Front stitch to rear stitch is 26cm, the overall length of the liner is 27cm. The Tour Lite Pro Evo is comparable to the stock Atomic Backland liner, perhaps just a smidge higher volume, so if you don't feel slop in the boot with the Backland liners then the Tour Lite Pro Evo should work well for you. You could save a little weight by going with the Tour Lite Pro which has the same fit with the only difference being that the cuff on the Pro Evo is higher volume and more rigid. The weight of the Tour Lite Pro Evo in a 26 is 157g and the weight of the Tour Lite Pro is 143g.
looking for a replacement liner for my PDG2. currently using a tlt8 custom light liner but still too much volume in the front foot. does these have more volume than the tlt8 CL, but still not too big in the upper calf? tested with the tlt8 CR liner and it was almost impossible to close the upper buckle.
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.