We are now bootfitting by appointment only.

Skimo Co

Marker Alpinist 12 Binding


In Stock

Free shipping

Marker had something impressive brewing in their secret lab: introducing the Marker Alpinist binding. The Alpinist brings release characteristics reserved for heavier bindings to the sub-250g category. The heel piece incorporates a spring-loaded track that keeps the heel piece flush with the heel of the boot, eliminating release-value fluctuation when the ski flexes. That, combined with high-tech materials and secure geometry lets you ski with confidence. You can also get more in tune with your skis due to the low ramp-angle enabled by the race-inspired heel piece. The binding is well-featured with BSL and lateral release adjustments, two riser positions, and optional brakes. If you have been on the fence about lightweight tech bindings, we encourage you to try the Marker Alpinist 12.

  • Dynamic Length Compensation in the heel piece eliminates ski flex from the release value equation.
  • 15mm of boot sole adjustment in the heel so you can use multiple boots.
  • Adjustable lateral release from 6-12 means you can ski at your chart value.
  • A “High” U-Spring controls vertical release and is swappable with Low and Medium springs, available separately.
  • Wide 38mm hole pattern in toe piece means more ski-hold and power transfer.
  • Rubber stops on the toe piece aid step-in so you can get to skiing faster.
  • Heel flap rests on U-Spring for fast transitions, but when spun 180° it will offer extra riser height.
  • Optional brakes come in 90mm, 105mm, and 115mm sizes.
  • Available Pintech ski crampons fit snugly in the receptors.
convert to ounces
Weight (pair) 534g
Boot Compatibility   Tech
Brakes   Optional 90mm, 105mm, 115mm
BSL Adjustment   15mm
Riser Heights   2 + Flat
Vertical Release   Fixed
Lateral Release   6-12
Crampon Ready   Kingpin and Alpinist crampons, Dynafit crampon compatible
Specs Verified Yes
Materials   Forged aluminium, carbon, fiber-reinforced polyamide
Skimo Co Says
Usage Touring
Notes Crazy light for a "gapless" binding
Bottom Line Light-weight adjustable touring binding
Compare to other Lean Bindings

Related Products

Questions & Reviews

Question from Olivier
Are these bindings compatible with Dynafit ski crampons ?
Answer from Will McD
Hi Oliver,
Dynafit ski crampons will work with these bindings, though they can be tricky and fiddly to get in.
Answer this question:

Question from Bobby
I have the Lange XT Free 130 LV alpine touring boots with both the Alpine Soles (ISO 5355) and the Gripwalk Soles (ISO 9523). Would my boots and these bindings be compatible with both soles, just the gripwalk soles or neither?

I also see the question from BK7 on the necessity of heel pads if installing without brakes, do these come with the bindings or do they need to be purchased separately?

Answer from Jeff
Bobby, you would need to use the Alpine touring soles with the Tech inserts. If you get this one, it comes with the heel pad. They are necessary to mount without a brake.
Answer this question:

Question from Mihai
Hy . I want to ask you if it is indicated to mount an adjustment plate to these bindings?. And second there is a difference whithout the brakes? Wish you well
Answer from Jeff
Mihai, The Alpinist does come with an integrated adjustment plate. It has 15mm of travel. The optional brakes would go on during mounting. If you need a longer adjustment plate and want the brakes, you can get that here Alpinst Long Travel.
Answer this question:

dub_xion (used product a few times)
So far a pretty good binding that I've found easy to use. Really low ramp angle; so low, in fact; I've added in heel wedges inside my boots to get a little increased forward lean! I've found the toes fairly easy to step into, about as easy as my Ions, maybe a little less easy than Dynafit Radicals. Stomping in to the U-springs takes a little more effort than pins.

If your DIN/RV is calculated close to a 9, I'd get the Alpinist 9 as the 12 spring is hard to step into. I've found the heel risers are actually pretty easy to deal with - if I'm taking an approach, I rotate it to the flat touring mode then flip up the high(ish) riser, and if I'm doing laps, I keep the pins forward and flip over the first level riser to allow for faster transitions; I don't really like to use super-high risers anyway, even for steep tracks as my balance gets thrown. I've managed to turn the heels 180deg with my pole tip, but this isn't the most quick operation, so I just set it and forget it. Haven't had these in a release situation yet, but they feel solid, and I like the kiss-gap heels with some travel as the ski flexes.

Overall a great weight/performance binding at under 300g, especially with traveling heels; I'll definitely consider these on future ski setups.
Comment on this review:

Question from BK7
Hey all.
Considering buying these toute suite.
If mounting without brakes, I see that the heel pads are "necessary". Just wondering if they are needed to support the heel while skiing, or if it's more for the walk/tour. Thanks.
Answer from Teddy Young
Hello! The heel pad is just to support the heel while skiing, which protects the rest of the heel unit during high downward forces on the U-spring.
Answer this question:

Question from Erik K
I am considering this Alpinist on a new set of skis. Have the later years gotten used to the ramp angle of the Trab Gara Titan Adjustable (7mm delta), and therefor shimmed up my old dynafits to match. But now I see that the Alpinist have a delta of 2 mm. Any experience of shimming up the heel of the alpinists? Sounds wrong to do so, but I am still wondering.
Answer from Jeff
Erik, Nice, set up all your skis to the same ramp angle. We don't have much experience with shimming up the heel since we do not have any shims for the Alpinist Heel.
Answer this question:

Ryan (used product a few times)
I opted to try these out on a new ski recently ordered, Blizzard G85...which are sick by the way! I'm used to a Dynafit binding with really easy to use climbing bars, with a flick of my pole. These new Markers ski great, relatively easy to get in and out of, although it does seem to take me a couple tries to get into the toe piece. The climbing bars are terrible. To adjust the bars to a higher height you would need to turn the heel piece 180 degrees and it's really, really tight and challenging to turn while skiing, something I probably won't do, so essentially I have one climbing height. I also opted to pass on the brakes (having learned that to engage and disengage them is a bit of a hassle) assuming there would be an easy place for a leash, but don't seem to see where it would go. So-so, I'll ski them a handful of more days and if they irritate me, I'll pull them off and put my old Dynafit's on.
Reply from Curly
I spin the heel before longer climbs so I have easy access to flat and steeper risers. The difference between the middle riser (flap over pins) and high riser (flap with the heel piece spun) is negligible so this seems to work well for me. There is a spot for a leash, same as the Dynafit Superlight toes. You'll need a leash with a soft loop such as the marker leash or plum leash.
Reply from sowr
I'm with Curly. I haven't felt the need to rotate the heel piece for the mid riser setting - and the leash attachment point works well. I really like these bindings. OutdoorGearLab gives them editor's choice in their binding review.
Reply from Nicholas M
I find the heel quite easy to spin around because I'm an alpinist. Also, cable leashes work just fine, you just have to shape the loop a little with some needle nose pliers.
Reply from ryan v
Oh ok, I’m just used to bindings at any price, especially this price having functionality to support the use, take a lesson from dynafit for example who understands functionality and makes a binding that you wouldn’t need to fully spin to change the height, guess I prefer to move faster than most...just not well thought out. I guess if you don’t ski much it prob won’t bother you. And it is tight as hell by the way, but they’re in a box in my garage if you want a good deal on them let me know...
Reply from Nicholas M
I’d be interested, I’m Nick Meinzer on FB
Reply from Nicholas M
Hey Princess Paws still got those Alpinists? I got $150 burnin’ a hole in m’pocket.
Comment on this review:

Question from Dillon Downs
How does the toe piece bolt pattern compare to the Salomon MTN? I'm debating between the two for some Wailer 112's.
Your listed weights are a little different than the manufacturer. Is that your scale vs published? Published weight the MTN (no brake) is 100 grms heavier than the Alpinist 12.
Answer from jbo
Hi Dillon, we weigh most of the gear in our store, look for "Specs Verified" in the Specs tab to see if it's our weight ("yes"). In this case, yes, both bindings were weighed on the same scale. We have all the mounting patterns here. The MTN is a touch wider while the Alpinist is longer.
Answer this question:

Question from dub_xion
Do you happen to know if the toe has the same hole pattern as the Kingpin?
Answer from Trace Leches
Hey Christian! Not sure yet, totally possible though. Once we get them in we'll be able to inspect them a bit closer. Regardless of whether it matches or not though, we'll post the info here.
Answer from jbo
Hi dub_xion, just to confirm now that we received them, the Alpinist toe pattern does match the Kingpin.
Answer this question:

Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.

Model: Alpinist 12 MPN: 7833S1

Follow us on social media

View full screen version