Ski Trab Titan Vario.2 Binding
The original Ski Trab Titan Vario is spoken of in hushed and reverent tones here at Skimo Co, and the fact that many of our employees ski this binding for ~90% of their days each season is evidence of how much we liked the original version. If the original Titan Vario was the first Toy Story movie, then the Titan Vario.2 binding is Toy Story 2-- the rare sequel that lives up to the high standard set by the original. Since one pin can flex partially open without forcing the other side to open, the Titan toe pieces have an amazing retention profile. The heels received the lion's share of the makeover, and the now-gapless units are offered with three different fixed-release levels in the ranges of 5-7, 7-9, or 9-11. The housing rides on a spring which keep the release consistent, and the track this heel unit rides on is flexible in order to accommodate ski flex. The Vario.2 has a safety and performance profile heretofore unheard of in this category of lightweight bindings. Aside from an updated heel release mechanism, Ski Trab added a third riser that will be welcome on steep skin tracks or in deep snow-- just rotate the heel 180 degrees and voilà, the tall boy is ready to go. Making changes to a product that had such few flaws is a risky game, but in the case of the Ski Trab Titan Vario.2, the gamble paid off big time.
- A high-strength titanium spring in the toe provides independent clamping on each side, decreasing the chances of pre-release.
- A short and flexible heel plate keeps the alterations to the flex of the ski at a minimum, preserving safety as well as performance.
- First heel riser is a race-flap, making it quick to deploy while keeping a higher option available with a simple twist.
- A fast and simple ski crampon attachment point on the back of the toe unit will feel very familiar to avid backcountry skiers.
- Gapless heel pin design means the release values remain more consistent throughout the flex of the ski.
- The titanium spring in the toe piece is durable and simple, with fewer moving parts than a traditional tech toe piece.
- Elasticity in both the toe and heel pieces absorbs impact from bumps while offering superior retention characteristics.
- Optional brakes mounted under the heels feature an innovative anti-friction mechanism that won't interfere with the release.
- Stepping into the binding is the same as before-- just press down on the toe lever with your pole and step in.
- The heel plate has a spring inside of it, providing 8mm of elasticity to account for ski flex.
- Roto-riveted toe pins clean the snow and debris from your boot fittings while you skin.
- Turn the heel housing 90 degrees for a functional flat mode for those long approaches.
- With 24mm of heel adjustment along the plate, you can accommodate a quiver of boots.
- While not adjustable*, three spring strengths are available to accommodate most skiers.
* Contrary to what the listed ranges might imply, this binding does not have adjustable release settings. Uniquely, Ski Trab provides a range of skier chart values that each fixed-spring set is targeting (both the internal lateral springs and the replaceable vertical U-springs vary in tension). The release has been testing towards the high end of the range, so round down if you're on the border (e.g. choose 7-9 if you're a 9).
Update 2022/23: Ski Trab added an anodized red option so your bindings can reflect your emotion when someone boots in the skin track.
| Specifications | |
|
Weight |
254g [7-9] |
| Weight (pair) | 508g [7-9] |
|
Boot |
Tech |
|
Brakes |
Accessory 78, 85, 94 |
|
BSL |
24mm |
|
Riser |
2 + Flat |
|
Vertical |
5-7, 7-9 or 9-11 |
|
Lateral |
5-7, 7-9 or 9-11 |
|
Crampon |
Included Option |
| Specs Verified | Yes |
| Design | |
|
|
Titanium toe bar, Ergal aluminum frame, steel pins |
| Skimo Co Says | |
| Usage | Ski touring, training, mountaineering |
| Notes | Gapless heel keeps the release consistent while the ski is flexing |
| Bottom Line | Unmatched combo of performance, retention, and weight |
| Compare to other Lean Bindings | |
Related Products
Questions & Reviews
3/21/2023
Hello! I'm wondering if it's possible to remove the brake/ski stopper on the Vario.2 (e.g. can you mount/remove as needed based on the season/tour? I'm not talking about swapping them in and out commonly, but would consider taking them off before long tours where weight is at a premium). It looks like the tower is mounted into the plate rather than the ski itself? And is there any reason that this binding would perform differently without the ski stoppers installed?
3/22/2023
Hi Lauren, indeed it's not too much of a project to get the brakes on and off. You remove the housing from the track and the brakes just squeeze between. The brakes are in interesting design that doesn't affect the release much as compared to similar weight add-on brakes, so no real functionality difference with or without them (other than the obvious extra step of retracting them for uphill).
3/22/2023
Awesome, thank you. I also actually emailed SkiTrab about this, and they mentioned that you need to mount an additional plate between the base plate and tower when the bindings are removed. Do you carry this plate? And do you know if the touring position reverts to neutral with the brake unit removed? It looks like the heel is a bit elevated with the brake unit in place.
3/22/2023
Hi Lauren, the plate is included with the bindings (we sell the brake as an accessory). Indeed, the "flat" mode is more flat without the brake as you can turn the heel sideways and not stand on the brake retraction mechanism.
Answer this question:
2/8/2023
Hi, I just bought some new boots and had a bit of trouble fitting them with the Ski Trab Titan Vario 2 binding. Would you mind looking at my video of this real quick? It is a very short video. (~6 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6kMo-jQLKY
Can you tell me if you have any major concerns with this setup? Or maybe explain the limitations of what I have here? Thanks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6kMo-jQLKY
Can you tell me if you have any major concerns with this setup? Or maybe explain the limitations of what I have here? Thanks.
2/8/2023
Hi Spencer, thanks for the video! You don't want to adjust the heel back past the line as that will compromise the compression spring in the heel track (and you should not use this binding without the track). You need to remount the toe or heel to accommodate your larger boot sole length. This is not a huge deal as the skis are plenty robust in the mounting area. I would personally move the toe forward since you're behind the recommended center point with the larger boot.
Answer this question:
I’ve had the Titan Vario 2.0 on my 4Frnt Hojis for two seasons now, and I’d like to share my thoughts.
Pros:
-best toepiece on the market
-incredible release and retention = confidence while skiing with toes unlocked
-relatively light
-zero durability issues after 100+ days of hard skiing
Cons:
-doesn’t have the same heel as Vario 1.0 (simpler, lighter)
-if it is going to have a heavier, “gapless” heel, then I think it should also have free-spinning pins (no U-spring) and perhaps a second riser option.
-I don’t like how the BSL adjustment screw sticks out when the heel is adjusted to the rear. (Looks weird and seems to attract ice)
Pros:
-best toepiece on the market
-incredible release and retention = confidence while skiing with toes unlocked
-relatively light
-zero durability issues after 100+ days of hard skiing
Cons:
-doesn’t have the same heel as Vario 1.0 (simpler, lighter)
-if it is going to have a heavier, “gapless” heel, then I think it should also have free-spinning pins (no U-spring) and perhaps a second riser option.
-I don’t like how the BSL adjustment screw sticks out when the heel is adjusted to the rear. (Looks weird and seems to attract ice)
2/8/2023
Hi Hayden, thanks for the feedback. Can you send a photo of the adjustment screw sticking out? That doesn't sound right.
2/8/2023
Thanks Jbo. As far as I can tell, this is how the binding is designed to function. I just think it’s ugly.
2/8/2023
Ah yes, all the bolt-positioning plates will have that, though some are covered in plastic for aesthetics.
Comment on this review:
1/28/2023
I was getting psyched on these bindings until I discovered that with brakes installed there is no longer a flat walk mode (because you step on the brake locking bar in the lowest mode). I've grown accustom to the efficiency of flat walking and rarely use a riser, so I think I would find that annoying (though not sure). Is there a place to attach a lease to this binding?
1/28/2023
Hi yeuhi, absolutely! There is a little leash loop that you can mount under the toe.
Answer this question:
1/24/2023
I'm contemplating the (beautiful?) heresy of mounting Trab bindings on Dynafit Free 107 skis, but I'm caught up questioning which release value to get. At 5'8" and 145 lbs, I run Dynafit Radicals cranked up to 8 to stop pre-release in moguls and trees, but given that the Vario.2 has actual elasticity, I'm wondering if I can go lower with the Trab heel. Do you think I'd be better served by the 5-7 or the 7-9?
1/25/2023
Nathaniel,
The Vario.2 typically releases around the upper number of the range, so I'd recommend the 5-7.
A Vario.2 on a Free 107 couldn't be described as anything other than beautiful!
The Vario.2 typically releases around the upper number of the range, so I'd recommend the 5-7.
A Vario.2 on a Free 107 couldn't be described as anything other than beautiful!
Answer this question:
1/20/2023
Have you guys re-verified the specs on these recently? I just had them mounted to a pair of AlpTracks 100 in a 177 (1215 g), and together they weigh 1550g. Also, the Trab site is saying 309g….
1/21/2023
Hi Chris, I just reweighed a pair it was the same down to the gram. We do not include mounting screw weights in our measurements which could account for half of the difference with Trab. Remember that most skis are made of wood, a natural product with varying density; our ski weights are an average of the units we receive. You will love that setup!
1/21/2023
Cool, thanks for double checking! It skied well today :).
Answer this question:
1/9/2023
Thoughts on the advisability of running these on something like a Black Crows Nocta? 122 underfoot, fully rockered, light-ish for what it is, but certainly not designed to be a touring ski.
Use case would be mainly gate access sidecountry steep and deep stuff.
I love ‘em on my blacklight 88s. Is this a bridge too far?
Use case would be mainly gate access sidecountry steep and deep stuff.
I love ‘em on my blacklight 88s. Is this a bridge too far?
1/10/2023
Chris,
Despite the light-looking design, the base plate is actually quite wide, lending this binding well towards skiing wide skis, at least as far as lightweight touring bindings go. Only thing to note is that you'll probably need to add brakes for resort skiing.
Despite the light-looking design, the base plate is actually quite wide, lending this binding well towards skiing wide skis, at least as far as lightweight touring bindings go. Only thing to note is that you'll probably need to add brakes for resort skiing.
Answer this question:
11/15/2022
Hi all,
Pretty weird question here, but I'm wondering about mixing and matching this binding with an ATK freeraider. Basically, I just bought a second-hand pair of skis with the Titan vario 2.0, but the heel piece needs to be moved to fit my boot. These are Moment Deathwish Tour. I also bought a new, skinnier set, the Salomon MTN Carbon 96 (bit of a gamble, not much word out there on these yet!) and caught a deal on some freeraiders.
Since I need to re-drill the larger set of skis, and I'll really only ever use them on deep days, I was thinking I might also use them in-bounds occasionally. Hence, considering putting the freeraider heel on those with the TV2 toe for potentially slightlier better release characteristics. Then the FR14 toe with TV2 heel on the Salomons.
Will that work? Is it dumb? Open to all suggestions and advice, thanks all.
Will
Pretty weird question here, but I'm wondering about mixing and matching this binding with an ATK freeraider. Basically, I just bought a second-hand pair of skis with the Titan vario 2.0, but the heel piece needs to be moved to fit my boot. These are Moment Deathwish Tour. I also bought a new, skinnier set, the Salomon MTN Carbon 96 (bit of a gamble, not much word out there on these yet!) and caught a deal on some freeraiders.
Since I need to re-drill the larger set of skis, and I'll really only ever use them on deep days, I was thinking I might also use them in-bounds occasionally. Hence, considering putting the freeraider heel on those with the TV2 toe for potentially slightlier better release characteristics. Then the FR14 toe with TV2 heel on the Salomons.
Will that work? Is it dumb? Open to all suggestions and advice, thanks all.
Will
11/15/2022
Hi Will, the new Salomon Carbons are great! That would be an unusual toe/heel paring; at first thought I wouldn't anticipate a net gain in retention/release function (guess would be potential for improved forward but reduced lateral).
Answer this question:
11/8/2022
Hi, are you able to share a picture of the screws and their lengths? Looking at remounting mine with inserts.
Cheers
Cheers
11/9/2022
Hi Adam, we have a listing for Trab parts.
Answer this question:
3/8/2022
Taco
(downright abused product)
Compelled to write this review in response to the uber niche protest review below (I'd wager $5 that guy's a road cyclist). When my touring buddies and clients ask me about my magical trab bindings I send them the link to skimo.co to read the description and the user reviews. I haven't found a binding that would be a better option than the Titan Varios for the 99% of people who would benefit from a binding in its category. I've thoroughly abused my two pairs and accumulated in excess of 350 miles on all sorts of skin tracks, snow conditions, rocks and drops. They do what they say on the tin, and they do it well.
Comment on this review:
3/4/2022
If I bought the 7-9 release value held piece but later decided I wanted to change the release value, would I be able to change out the heel spring?
3/4/2022
Hi Calvin,
Although not an item that we stock, the U-spring in the Ski Trab Titan Vario.2 can be changed out. However, that will only affect the vertical release value of the binding. In order to change out the lateral release value, you will need to get new heel pieces. You can find Vario.2 heels under our Ski Trab Heel Pieces listing.
Although not an item that we stock, the U-spring in the Ski Trab Titan Vario.2 can be changed out. However, that will only affect the vertical release value of the binding. In order to change out the lateral release value, you will need to get new heel pieces. You can find Vario.2 heels under our Ski Trab Heel Pieces listing.
Answer this question:
1 star? OK yeah thats an exaggeration. But now that you have my attention please hear me out...
Ski Trab makes the best bindings on the market. This is a simple fact due to the lateral elasticity in the heel piece and the unique toe design. But I want to call attention to the absolute tragedy that is the discontinuation of the Vario 1 which is a better binding for most ski tourers. The Vario 1, mounted flat on ski or with an ATK R01 plate offers nearly identical performance with less ramp angle and ~100g less weight per ski. I personally prefer a 5mm binding delta which is achievable by using the Vario 1 with the ATK R01 plate, and cannot be had with the Vario2 without using a heavy toe shim from B&D or by making one yourself. Like Zach, I am unconvinced that the gapless heel design is worth the extra weight and bulk.
Ski Trab - I hope you're reading this. Why are you depriving us of what is essentially the perfect binding? Please make the Vario 1 again!
Ski Trab makes the best bindings on the market. This is a simple fact due to the lateral elasticity in the heel piece and the unique toe design. But I want to call attention to the absolute tragedy that is the discontinuation of the Vario 1 which is a better binding for most ski tourers. The Vario 1, mounted flat on ski or with an ATK R01 plate offers nearly identical performance with less ramp angle and ~100g less weight per ski. I personally prefer a 5mm binding delta which is achievable by using the Vario 1 with the ATK R01 plate, and cannot be had with the Vario2 without using a heavy toe shim from B&D or by making one yourself. Like Zach, I am unconvinced that the gapless heel design is worth the extra weight and bulk.
Ski Trab - I hope you're reading this. Why are you depriving us of what is essentially the perfect binding? Please make the Vario 1 again!
2/22/2022
While I understand the sentiment and do not disagree, I think it's funny that you think that Italians care about what Americans want. Also, for the Vario 1.0 fans, have any of you pre released out of 5mm steel gara titan? Just saying if you want simplicity with less weight, it's there. If you pre release on that, then just mount it under manufacturers recommended heel gap
2/23/2022
Hey Anthony, the Italians may not care enough to restart production, but they are listening as their product roadmap develops. It should also be noted that Trab officially recommends skiing the Gara Titan "blocked", at least in anything consequential.
2/23/2022
Dear Anthony, while I have pre released from the gara titan it was with the 4.5mm steel spring. It was a lateral release so I don't think the spring thickness would have mattered? Also is it too much to ask to get a decent binding where I don't need to set it up under the manufacturer recommended heel gap? Also why are we talking here please respond to my text so I can buy your damn Vario 1's.
Comment on this review:
Sorry folks - I'm not on the hype train. The Trab toe is obviously superior to anything else on the market, but the Vario.2 heel is simply too bulky and not especially functional to be worth the weight. Get a Gara Titan or the Vario 1 if you can find it.
The only benefit I see for the Vario.2 heel is that it is perhaps safer with a consistent release from the gapless setup. Personally, I found the purported "downhill elasticity" to be a mirage, or at the very least well overrated. I didn't detect *any* elasticity benefit on the downhill.
Therefore, you have to determine whether gapless release is worth 130g per binding. Otherwise, get a Gara Titan or the Vario 1 (if you can find it). To me, it's not worthwhile. There are a lot of other features you can add in the 250g range. I already find most of those to be not worth the weight, and the gapless release falls in the same category for me. I'm generally skeptical of tech binding release: whether your purported, non-standard release value is an 8 or a 9, whether your ski flexed x mm instead of y so the torque needed to pop out was a or b, whether your preferred lateral release value is different than your preferred vertical release value. The best strategy seems to be to simply not crash.
And add on other deficiencies with the heel: so much plastic - not confidence inspiring, an oddly high default riser height (51mm vs the typical 35-40mm of most race bindings). It's not worthy of the hype imo.
Sorry to the lightweight ski touring community - I am a naysayer. I skied these 5-7 times then sold them.
The only benefit I see for the Vario.2 heel is that it is perhaps safer with a consistent release from the gapless setup. Personally, I found the purported "downhill elasticity" to be a mirage, or at the very least well overrated. I didn't detect *any* elasticity benefit on the downhill.
Therefore, you have to determine whether gapless release is worth 130g per binding. Otherwise, get a Gara Titan or the Vario 1 (if you can find it). To me, it's not worthwhile. There are a lot of other features you can add in the 250g range. I already find most of those to be not worth the weight, and the gapless release falls in the same category for me. I'm generally skeptical of tech binding release: whether your purported, non-standard release value is an 8 or a 9, whether your ski flexed x mm instead of y so the torque needed to pop out was a or b, whether your preferred lateral release value is different than your preferred vertical release value. The best strategy seems to be to simply not crash.
And add on other deficiencies with the heel: so much plastic - not confidence inspiring, an oddly high default riser height (51mm vs the typical 35-40mm of most race bindings). It's not worthy of the hype imo.
Sorry to the lightweight ski touring community - I am a naysayer. I skied these 5-7 times then sold them.
2/18/2022
Thanks Zach, all opinions are welcome! I admit to having a stash of Vario 1s and to having a no-crash strategy. I also see the arguments for these features and am happy to have them on one setup. I think gapless benefits are correlated to the skier-size / ski-stiffness ratio.
Comment on this review:
1/29/2022
How do you lock the stopper to walk with the heel flat?
1/29/2022
Hi Håkon,
The Vario.2 with a stopper installed does not quite have a flat mode. The lowest you can go is resting atop the lever that flips in front of the heel piece when retracting the brake arms. The first riser can be accessed with the pins facing forward, and the higher riser can be accessed by turning the heel 180 degrees. Feel free to reach out to us at help@skimo.co with any further questions!
The Vario.2 with a stopper installed does not quite have a flat mode. The lowest you can go is resting atop the lever that flips in front of the heel piece when retracting the brake arms. The first riser can be accessed with the pins facing forward, and the higher riser can be accessed by turning the heel 180 degrees. Feel free to reach out to us at help@skimo.co with any further questions!
Answer this question:
1/18/2022
Any plans for a vario.2 brake to fit skis ~106mm underfoot? Or could the widest brakes currently available be bent to fit? Thx.
1/18/2022
Hi Michael,
Unfortunately, Ski Trab does not make a brake wider than 94mm for the Vario.2. Brakes can often be bent to accommodate a wider ski, but bending from 94mm to 106mm would not work. Feel free to reach out to help@skimo.co for other solutions!
Unfortunately, Ski Trab does not make a brake wider than 94mm for the Vario.2. Brakes can often be bent to accommodate a wider ski, but bending from 94mm to 106mm would not work. Feel free to reach out to help@skimo.co for other solutions!
Answer this question:
Mounted on my Magico.2 ski. They perform amazingly on the descent, are light enough for the ascent and the brakes are well thought out.
I find the toe works better than an ATK toe as far as snow packing issues. However after a long day I find them a bit difficult to remove due to the spring strength.
The heels are great, but if using without the brakes you need an extra piece(spacer) so the adjustment track operates correctly.
I love the brakes and how I can still do a one motion transition with them, unlike the ATK heel brakes. However I do notice some snow packing into the space between the heel and the brakes a few times now which has required some work to remove.
I find the toe works better than an ATK toe as far as snow packing issues. However after a long day I find them a bit difficult to remove due to the spring strength.
The heels are great, but if using without the brakes you need an extra piece(spacer) so the adjustment track operates correctly.
I love the brakes and how I can still do a one motion transition with them, unlike the ATK heel brakes. However I do notice some snow packing into the space between the heel and the brakes a few times now which has required some work to remove.
Comment on this review:
Necessity is the mother of invention...Everyone knows that trab bindings are the best now. They are no longer a secret. I can even get the r values I need now!
But, how can the best improve?
A) it's a little fat on the lean side. I think a lot more weight loss can occur in the heel area while keeping it gapless. Perhaps even lowering the track from 8mm to 4mm like the marker alpinist? Would be curious to see how much travel is used or necessary during intense loading.
B) lotta plastic. More TI plz.
C) high heel ramp. 8.5mm. ouch.
D) would be improved by having independent pins like the freeraider. More durability, release and serviceability options.
E) freeride spacer-SO HAWT RIGHT NOW.
F) I like the brake design, but 94mm as the max???? Fortunately I don't use brakes, but they aren't wide enough for any sidecountry ski I want to take into that terrain even if the binder can easily handle it.
So I took it upon myself to upgrayyyyd the Vario 2.0 into the Vario 2.69420.
The Vario 2.69420 comes complete with freeride spacer for maximum sendage and "for your pleasure" skiing. I also decided that skiing in high heels is ridiculous so I didn't settle for a low heel ramp angle...I gave the Vario 2.69420 a POSITIVE +2, ramp angle for max biomechanical efficiency and a more upright balance point for my long ass femurs and tibias. This involved a jigsaw, Dremel, ABS block of plastic, Christmas story type dad cursing, and about 30 minutes of grinding long screws down to fit into the trabs.
We shall see if trab adopts any of these suggestions for the 3.0. until then the Vario 2.69420 may be the hottest binding of 2040. The future is now.
But, how can the best improve?
A) it's a little fat on the lean side. I think a lot more weight loss can occur in the heel area while keeping it gapless. Perhaps even lowering the track from 8mm to 4mm like the marker alpinist? Would be curious to see how much travel is used or necessary during intense loading.
B) lotta plastic. More TI plz.
C) high heel ramp. 8.5mm. ouch.
D) would be improved by having independent pins like the freeraider. More durability, release and serviceability options.
E) freeride spacer-SO HAWT RIGHT NOW.
F) I like the brake design, but 94mm as the max???? Fortunately I don't use brakes, but they aren't wide enough for any sidecountry ski I want to take into that terrain even if the binder can easily handle it.
So I took it upon myself to upgrayyyyd the Vario 2.0 into the Vario 2.69420.
The Vario 2.69420 comes complete with freeride spacer for maximum sendage and "for your pleasure" skiing. I also decided that skiing in high heels is ridiculous so I didn't settle for a low heel ramp angle...I gave the Vario 2.69420 a POSITIVE +2, ramp angle for max biomechanical efficiency and a more upright balance point for my long ass femurs and tibias. This involved a jigsaw, Dremel, ABS block of plastic, Christmas story type dad cursing, and about 30 minutes of grinding long screws down to fit into the trabs.
We shall see if trab adopts any of these suggestions for the 3.0. until then the Vario 2.69420 may be the hottest binding of 2040. The future is now.
12/24/2021
Trying for more pics but it won't let me
12/24/2021
There we go. Just gotta type more.
12/24/2021
Ahh forgot G) make a different version for general touring with a wider (but same design) toe piece for more leverage on fat sticks. May do nothing, but it's all about those marginal gains.
12/24/2021
Great project, meanwhile I keep pushing Adriano to bring back the Vario 1.0.
How do you rate those Fraction skis? Valid answers are either 69/420 or 420/69 stars.
How do you rate those Fraction skis? Valid answers are either 69/420 or 420/69 stars.
12/25/2021
Jbo, the Fractions are certainly on the 420/69 side of things. I think there is still a place for the 1.0, mo options mo betta
2/7/2022
Anthony, how thick is your spacer, and how high over your ski are the toe and heel pins with that spacer?
5/4/2022
Anthony how do the free ride spacers affect touring when in flat mode?
5/4/2022
Flat mode becomes a few mil less flat. If you are considering a freeride spacer, this probably won't bother you. I also don't really flat skin often or select bindings based on that capability fwiw.
Comment on this review:
I have about 10 days on these now - mostly tours, but also a couple half days of lift-served skiing. Full range of PNW conditions from volcano corn to winter Cascade concrete and even some firm and choppy groomers. I'm 175lbs, 5'10", aggressive skier, and went with the 7-9 springs. No regrets. For as light and simple as these are, the downhill performance is amazing. No issues with pre-release. While I haven't crashed on 'em yet where I've wanted to release, I did kick them off while climbing in breakable crust when I *didn't* have them locked in climbing mode. For simple uphill routes I' haven't needed them locked, but will definitely lock them for spicier climbs or breaking trail.
The only *complaint* really isn't one: the toe pieces aren't step in. Recommend practicing before you need to step in on a knife-edge...
These are worth the coin without question.
The only *complaint* really isn't one: the toe pieces aren't step in. Recommend practicing before you need to step in on a knife-edge...
These are worth the coin without question.
Comment on this review:
12/7/2021
Will you get these in 9-11 heel springs in stock any time soon?
Thanks
Thanks
12/7/2021
Hi Luke, delays are definitely a thing this season! Yes we are expecting more by the end of the month, and then more again early 2022.
Answer this question:
11/11/2021
I love my Titans on my skinny skis and I’m sure the vario 2 is is going to be in my shopping cart for my next binding purchase. Paired with the La Sportiva Skorpius has been nice for the step in option and I have no complaints. I’m doing my best to convert my buddies onto the trab train as I’m convinced these are an amazing innovation in tech toe technology. Curious if there is any talk or coming availability of a wider brake…? would love to see these on a 100 underfoot ski
11/11/2021
Thanks for reaching out, Caleb. There's nothing in the pipeline (yet). However, the 94 could be stretched to fit a 100mm underfoot ski! Please let us know if you have any other questions!
Answer this question:
Earn store credit by writing reviews. Learn more.
