(hover to zoom, click to enlarge)

Blizzard Zero G 95 Ski

0 reviews | Ask a question

Brand: Blizzard
Model: Zero G 95
Shipping: FREE*
Availability: In Stock & Ships Today

Price: $699.95

- or add to package

* Ski Length:

Qty:

- OR -

Add to Wish List
Add to Compare

Words Specs Reviews & Qs (3) Related (4)

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it". Well, the design of the Zero G 95 definitely wasn't broken, but Blizzard still somehow found a way to fix it. The previous Zero G 95 was widely praised for being versatile and reliable across a wide range of conditions and skill levels, yet Blizzard wasn't satisfied. They took their fantastic Carbon Overlay technology and tweaked it to ensure a more reliable and obedient flex, yet still kept it damp and stable. They also altered the core construction, and began to taper the sidewall much earlier. The result is a softer feeling tip and tail with the same rock solid feel underfoot, making it a more easy-going version of itself. Blizzard took a gamble in making changes to a ski that was previously so popular, but their gamble paid off and the updated Zero G 95 is a downright delight to ski.

The reworked core is protected by durable sidewalls, making your October ski-outing in 8" of fresh slightly less of a bad idea.
Rocker in the tip keeps you afloat while skinning and also keeps you afloat while descending with a smile.
Blizzard's own Carbon Overlay provides dampening and adds exactly zero g's extra weight.
This isn't a technical point, but we really like the new graphics.

Specifications
Lengths (cm)	164, 171, 178, 185
Weight -> ounces	1160g [164] 1215g [171] 1300g [178] 1360g [185]
Weight (pair)	2320g [164] 2430g [171] 2600g [178] 2720g [185]
Dimensions	128-95-111.5
Turn Radius	19m [164] 20m [171] 21m [178] 22m [185]
Skin Fix	Roundish tips, flat notched tail
Specs Verified	Yes
Design
Profile	Mild rocker, camber underfoot
Shape	Cruising radius w/ arcing tip & tail
Construction	Sidewall sandwich w/ Carbon Drive
Core	Paulownia
Skimo Co Says
Usage	Everyday adventures
Notes	Full sidewall helps w/ rocks
Bottom Line	Workhorse tourer

I’m a huge Voile fan but these have totally caught my eye for an Eastern Sierra daily AT ski. I have Hyperchargers (tele), Ultravectors (tele), Objectives (AT) and I'm trying to decide between these and the Hypervectors! Can you help shed any light? I think I’d rock 178s for either at 6’ and 160lbs. Also I’m planning on Plum 170s and I’m skiing the Fischer Travers Carbon boots.

Rory, the Zero G 85 is the Classic Spring ski, this one is more versatile. It is a bit stiffer overall than the Hypervector and should handle Sierra conditions maybe a bit better than the Voiles. As the description says, Blizzard detuned the tips a bit to allow easier turn initiation. Would be a wonderful choice.

Answer this question:

Any concerns and recommendations for mounting tele bindings to these skis?

Hello Casey, mounting these with telemark bindings would be fine! I would recommend mounting them a centimeter or two behind the boot center line.

Answer this question:

What is the recommended mount point (cm from center) on the updated version? Interested in the 178, if it varies by size.

Hey zjh!
The recommended mount point on the 178's is 98 cm from the tip if you measure in a straight line. The mount point does vary by size and the 171's measure 94.5 cm from the tip in a straight line. Hope that helps!!

Okay, thanks Cole. So that's approx -9.X cm from center (depending on the straight-tape pull of the ski). I was asking because I heard Blizzard moved the mount point forward with updated 0G series. I dislike very traditional mount points, despite understanding it's easier to kickturn with less tail.

Hey Zak! We had a older 0G that I measured for you and it measured 98.4 cm straight from the tip. Blizzard did move the mount point 4 mm forward from previous years. Hope that helps!!

Answer this question: